Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By *Wookie-Chick*

Thread: Monkey selfie: Court rules Naruto the macaque cannot own photo copyright.

  1. #1
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012

    Default Monkey selfie: Court rules Naruto the macaque cannot own photo copyright.

    Monkey selfie: Court rules macaque cannot own photo copyright, PETA says case 'exposes hypocrisy'

    Monkey selfie: Court rules macaque cannot own photo copyright, PETA says case 'exposes hypocrisy'

    ABC News
    1 hour ago

    Animals rights group PETA has lost a legal bid for a monkey to own copyright to selfies it took, in a case the organisation says exposes "the hypocrisy of those who exploit animals".

    Provided by ABC News A selfie taken by monkey Naruto, who had picked up a photographer's unattended camera.

    In September last year, PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) filed a lawsuit asking the US federal court in San Francisco to declare male crested macaque Naruto the author and owner of the famous photographs he took of himself.

    At the time Naruto was living freely in a group in Indonesia. He picked up a tourist's unattended camera and began taking photographs of the forest floor, some of other maraques and several of himself.

    On Wednesday, a federal judge in San Francisco ruled the monkey could not be declared the copyright owner of the photos.

    Jeff Kerr, general counsel for PETA US, said the organization would continue fighting for the monkey's rights.

    "Despite this setback, legal history was made today because we argued to a federal court why Naruto should be the owner of the copyright rather than been seen as a piece of property himself," he told the ABC.

    "This case is also exposing the hypocrisy of those who exploit animals for their own gain."

    According to PETA, the US Copyright Act grants copyright ownership of a "selfie" to the "author" of the photograph, and there is nothing in the law limiting such ownership on the basis of species.

    PETA said on its website before the case: "As 'next friend' to Naruto, we're seeking the court's permission to manage the copyright of the photos, license them for commercial use, and use 100 per cent of the proceeds to benefit Naruto and his community, whose habitat and very existence are under threat."
    rollo likes this.

  2. #2
    Elite Member rollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009


    ^ I saw this article in a print version and have never read anything so ridiculous!
    I have some famous friends and I have mostly not famous friends.

  3. #3
    Elite Member panic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013


    @ the selfie
    "The wild, cruel beast is not behind the bars of the cage. He is in front of it."...Axel Munthe

  4. #4
    Elite Member ManxMouse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007


    I'm sure it's part of the "personhood" legal strategy... to get a legal foothold/precedent as far as animals having rights of their own, rather than being merely property or objects.
    Santa is an elitist mother fucker -- giving expensive shit to rich kids and nothing to poor kids.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Supreme Court Rules in Contraceptive Case
    By sluce in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: July 10th, 2014, 06:55 PM
  2. India court rules gay sex legal
    By NicoleWasHere in forum News
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: July 2nd, 2009, 06:34 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: July 22nd, 2008, 06:39 PM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: November 26th, 2007, 08:21 AM
  5. Replies: 6
    Last Post: October 14th, 2005, 05:49 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts