Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: Katie Holmes' parents didn't see baby Suri until 2½ weeks after the 'birth'

  1. #1
    Friend of Gossip Rocks! buttmunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Uranus
    Posts
    31,884

    Default Katie Holmes' parents didn't see baby Suri until 2½ weeks after the 'birth'

    Cruise Baby: Katie’s Parents Had To Wait

    Forget whatever it was Tom Cruise told Diane Sawyer about his relationship with Katie Holmes' parents.

    The truth is, Katie's parents, Martin and Kathleen Holmes, didn’t get to see baby Suri up close and personal until the day of the "Mission: Impossible 3" premiere in Los Angeles. That would have been May 4. Suri was born in the late afternoon on April 17.

    You do the math, fans. That's two and a half weeks. The Holmeses were specifically not invited until Tom was back home in Los Angeles after his worldwide promotional tours and could monitor the baby’s first visit with her maternal grandparents. Tom’s mother, Mary Jo Mapother-South was there for the delivery. So were Tom’s sisters. But, as widely reported, the Holmeses were at their vacation home in Florida when they got the news that their daughter had given birth to their first grandchild.

    “They are heartbroken,” says the source who filled me in on this, and this person knows what they’re talking about. But no one who’s interviewed Cruise for "MI:3" has dared asked these questions. Instead, they’ve let Cruise refer to Katie as “Kate” and do all the talking for her. The Holmeses are scared to speak out, say friends, for fear that they will be cut off even more from Katie and Suri.

    It’s not like the public hasn’t sensed something is wrong with all this. The result has been an enormous backlash against Cruise. Yesterday’s box office numbers for "MI:3" were even lower than the day before. The movie took in a mere $2,783,719 on Wednesday, down 13 percent from Tuesday’s $3,204,660 according to boxofficemojo.com. This is a big problem since "MI:3" is playing in 4,000 theatres, one of the widest releases ever for a feature film. At this point, if tonight’s numbers aren’t much, much better, "MI:3" will begin to self-destruct.

    If you’re looking for context here, compare "MI:3" to "Spider Man 2," a movie that played in a comparable number of theaters. On the first Tuesday and Wednesday after its weekend debut, "Spider Man 2" took in, respectively, $10 million and $9 million. "MI: 3" is very far off that track.


    foxnews.com
    If there even is a baby, that is reallly fucked up. What a control-freak freakazoid.
    'Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither.' Ben Franklin

    "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross."
    --Sinclair Lewis

  2. #2
    Elite Member darksithbunny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    14,965

    Default Re: Katie Holmes' parents didn't see baby Suri until 2½ weeks after the 'birth'

    Terrible. Control freak. Maybe the baby's real daddy will step up. Who is it again? Josh or Chris? I am so confused.

  3. #3
    Friend of Gossip Rocks! buttmunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Uranus
    Posts
    31,884

    Default Re: Katie Holmes' parents didn't see baby Suri until 2½ weeks after the 'birth'

    I think it's some low-level pr guy in London who doesn't even realize he's become a daddy.
    'Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither.' Ben Franklin

    "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross."
    --Sinclair Lewis

  4. #4
    Elite Member LynnieD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    34,696

    Default Re: Katie Holmes' parents didn't see baby Suri until 2½ weeks after the 'birth'

    ^^Yup, that's the one Buttmunch....

  5. #5
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,620

    Default Re: Katie Holmes' parents didn't see baby Suri until 2½ weeks after the 'birth'

    The day is going to come very soon when Katie will be pleading with her parents to help her get out of this mess. My wish is they'll be vacationing it up again and too busy to fit her into their schedule!

  6. #6
    Elite Member Butterfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In a Handbasket
    Posts
    5,447

    Default Re: Katie Holmes' parents didn't see baby Suri until 2½ weeks after the 'birth'

    I can’t believe his family was welcome but hers weren’t, because we all know that women want their Mother “In Law” there and not their own mothers. Tom is a piece of shit.
    ><((((º>·. ¸¸. ·´¯`·.¸¸><((((º>><((((º>`·.¸¸.··´¯`·...¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.. ><((((º> `·.¸¸.·´¯`·...¸><((((º>

  7. #7
    Elite Member angelais's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Jon Hamm's pants
    Posts
    12,751

    Default Re: Katie Holmes' parents didn't see baby Suri until 2½ weeks after the 'birth'

    What a fuckhead. Katie has been brainwashed, as far as I'm concerned. Some say, "well she's an adult, she makes her own choices" but like Butterfly said, who the hell wants their mother in law at the "birth" and not their own mother?

    Just another sign that this whole pregnancy thing is a farce. That little midget needs an ass beating.

    I'm done venting now.
    Did you know that an anagram for "Conscious Uncoupling" is "Iconic Uncool Pus Guns"? - MohandasKGanja

  8. #8
    Elite Member aabbcc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Watching the sun set over Lake Superior.
    Posts
    18,973

    Default Re: Katie Holmes' parents didn't see baby Suri until 2½ weeks after the 'birth'

    Notice there have been no photos of Katie out with a stroller or carriage ... no photos of her carrying a blanket-wrapped bundle.

    There are usually at least a few pictures of stars with their new babies floating around before the official pics are released.

  9. #9
    Elite Member KandyKorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    cubicle hell
    Posts
    2,526

    Default Re: Katie Holmes' parents didn't see baby Suri until 2½ weeks after the 'birth'

    ^^Yeah, that's what I've been thinking....I guess Tom wants a lot of money for the first pictures of the alien child....I feel bad for this kid.
    I'm not quite drunk enough to really care, but is this her violation of her violation of her violation of her violation of probation or her violation of her violation of her violation of her probation????? ~MontanaMama on LL's latest arrest.

  10. #10
    Friend of Gossip Rocks! buttmunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Uranus
    Posts
    31,884

    Default Re: Katie Holmes' parents didn't see baby Suri until 2½ weeks after the 'birth'

    Notice there have been no photos of Katie out with a stroller or carriage ... no photos of her carrying a blanket-wrapped bundle.
    But there was that fabulous shot of her 'nursing bra'--and no one could possibly see through that ploy to make us all believe there actually was a baby.
    'Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither.' Ben Franklin

    "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross."
    --Sinclair Lewis

  11. #11
    Elite Member Palermo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Nor Cal
    Posts
    9,580

    Default Re: Katie Holmes' parents didn't see baby Suri until 2½ weeks after the 'birth'

    I read someplace that her parents went away on purpose to try and disguise the fact that they weren't wanted at the event. What a sad situation

  12. #12
    Bronze Member OhSnap's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    17

    Default Re: Katie Holmes' parents didn't see baby Suri until 2½ weeks after the 'birth'

    So, I'm guessing that Tom had to be there so that katie couldnt be alone with her parents. Scary!

  13. #13
    Elite Member twitchy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Dancing on your grave!!!!
    Posts
    9,131

    Default Re: Katie Holmes' parents didn't see baby Suri until 2½ weeks after the 'birth'

    Poor stupid Katie.

    "The howling backwoods that is IMDB is where film criticism goes to die (and then have its corpse gang-raped, called a racist, and accused of supporting Al-Qaeda)" ----Sean O'Neal, The Onion AV Club

  14. #14
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,620

    Default Re: Katie Holmes' parents didn't see baby Suri until 2½ weeks after the 'birth'

    Quote Originally Posted by Palermo
    I read someplace that her parents went away on purpose to try and disguise the fact that they weren't wanted at the event. What a sad situation
    You know I'm really pissed at Katie. Anyone else? She's getting off way too easy in the court of public opinion. Brainwashed or not, who completely dumps their parents for this moron (Cruise)? Obviously Katie's parents have only wanted the best for her and looked out for her best interests. Cruise - not so much.

    Unfortunately, Katie's parents are in a bad position because TomKat will use Suri as a pawn. They don't have a leg to stand on if they want to have any part of their granddaughter's upbringing. Tom is EVIL personified!!!

  15. #15
    Elite Member Icepik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    12,002

    Default Re: Katie Holmes' parents didn't see baby Suri until 2½ weeks after the 'birth'

    Maybe her parents are getting a huge slice of that money pie?

    Katie $15 million, her parents $5 million? Maybe??

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Katie Holmes’ parents may boycott wedding
    By twitchy in forum Gossip Archive
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: July 17th, 2006, 02:51 PM
  2. Replies: 63
    Last Post: July 11th, 2006, 06:02 PM
  3. Tom Cruise Sets Rules for Katie Holmes to Follow for Baby Suri
    By lovely bones in forum Gossip Archive
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: May 14th, 2006, 06:45 PM
  4. Katie Holmes' parents meet Suri Cruise for the first time
    By MaryJane in forum Gossip Archive
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: May 9th, 2006, 07:23 PM
  5. Replies: 9
    Last Post: April 21st, 2006, 11:58 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •