Victoria's Secret 2007 models

**leigh** · November 17th, 2007, 01:29 PM

Heidi does look the best, and she's popped out 3 kids! Some of them are just too skinny; you can see how they arch their backs to give the illusion of having an ass.

**Egolita** · November 17th, 2007, 01:53 PM

one of them has a pretty big booty.

and the one with the 'diaper' panties. gross. her hip bones look yucky.

freaky undies though. very colorful.

**ariesallover** · November 17th, 2007, 02:11 PM

I love the spectacle aspect of this marketing. It's brilliant, and it's totally working as an event, not because they want to sell the bizarre shit in these photos, but because it brings the brand more sales for blah bras and beige cotton briefs.

I can't believe they're even making the Spice Girls crap work so well for VS, though I'm still thinking that's going to backfire.

**lurkur** · November 17th, 2007, 03:10 PM

Originally Posted by Sojiita

I agree. The very first pic is a good representation of this..those bolt on boobs look ridiculous. The rest..not skin and bones, but still pretty damn thin,...but the best at least look proportional, and most look like they are naturally thin at least-not artifically starved-down thin.

I agree with you guys. I saw that first picture and thought, "Bones & Boobs."

From this distance, it looks like one of the world's hairiest bushes (up there along with Dr. Laura's

).

**SunShine23** · November 17th, 2007, 05:51 PM

they all look good, but heidi's stomach is wonky IMO. looks lipo-ed

**celeb_2006** · November 17th, 2007, 08:30 PM

Ewww I despise bolt ons. I don't find these women very attractive, except for maybe adriana lima (that is her right?).

**Nerissa** · November 17th, 2007, 08:43 PM

Hahahaha! Sexy? Not so much....

All of them look really hungry... (Except Heidi) lol!

**esmereldagrubb** · November 17th, 2007, 11:55 PM

Originally Posted by Egolita

one of them has a pretty big booty.

and the one with the 'diaper' panties. gross. her hip bones look yucky.

freaky undies though. very colorful.

Karolina has the best ass of the bunch......Perfect , not big at all!
It only looks big because of the shot and because the rest of her is so darn small!
HEre is an amazing shot of the amazing butt!

**january** · November 18th, 2007, 12:54 AM

I don't think they're too skinny, they don't look anorexic, they look fine. A few of them look a bit too skinny for me. But even at that, their bodies don't really do it for me, I prefer to look at a more hourglass shape, thats just the type of aesthetic that I like. But even though some of these girls have great bodies by majority standards, I see about three that are extremely fugly from the neck up, which is a bit surprising. VS usually has had pretty models in the past, but it seems they have really missed the mark this year. I have never found Alessandra Ambrosio appealing at all, I find her face weird and Picasso-like. Adriana Lima is very pretty, she looks too porn star for my tastes, but yes she is pretty. Heidi's face is a mess with her nose job. The girl under Alessandra's first picture is UGLY! I really can't believe that. Karolina is beautiful when she keeps her mouth closed, she has a very ugly mouth otherwise. The only one I find very pretty in the face, I think her name is Miranda Kerr.

Oh, and Marisa Miller could be so awesome except for those awful implants, they ruin everything, they just look so wonky.

**Voodoo Child** · November 18th, 2007, 01:36 AM

Most of them look good but one or two have fugly hip bones sticking out. Heidi looks great.

**marina** · November 18th, 2007, 06:15 AM

I don't think Heidi looks that great. She's completely lost her waistline.

**MsDark** · November 18th, 2007, 07:29 AM

The chick with the hipbones jutting out and the chick wearing red and white in the second set of pics are too skinny. And look positively gross with fake boobs on top of the "too skinny"

**Tati** · November 18th, 2007, 09:48 AM

It's weird - I appreciate athletic bodies, slender, willowy bodies, and more curvy bodies, but somehow... it's like the majority of these girls are some weird combination of all three but not quite hitting the mark (to my tastes, anyway). Maybe it's that they have that no-waist thing going on. They're not unattractive by any means but it seems like the Victoria's Secret models of the past always looked better. I'm fine with thin as long as it's not extreme, but most of these girls just have no shape other than the fake boobs. WHAT HAPPENED TO WAISTS?!

**nycgirl** · November 18th, 2007, 01:27 PM

well I don't know about the models, but those outfits are fugly.....not sexy at all

**o0Amber0o** · November 18th, 2007, 01:55 PM

Sorry, but if the underwear you're modeling doesn't fit YOU'RE TOO SKINNY.

Anyway, I think MOST of these girls are your standard Playboyesque girls. Toned, big boobs, big hair. You wouldn't want a fashion model posing in sexy underwear, it'd be disgusting.