Go Back   Gossip Rocks Forum > Gossip and Discussion > Weight


Login to remove all ads!
Old April 13th, 2008, 09:37 AM   #1 (permalink)
qwerty
Elite Member
 
qwerty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,594
Default Now fashion mags make models 'fatter'

The fashion industry has long been accused of making models and actresses look thinner and is now using the same techniques in reverse to deflect criticism.

Belinda Coleman, of the retouching agency The Shoemakers Elves, said there was a trend towards presenting less "extreme" images of thinness and of enhancing figures. "Where models are looking particularly gaunt, magazines are saying, 'We can't have that - fill out their chests,'?" she said.

"It is now deemed just as negative to be too thin as too fat. Every*one is scared of being highlighted as the magazine or label that promotes very thin girls, so they are being a lot more careful about the images they present."
Another agency, the iWanex Studio, boasts a portfolio of "before and after" images of celebrities that it has retouched for magazines. In one of the "after" photographs, the thighs of Cameron Diaz, the actress, have been visibly widened, her arms filled out and her stomach made smoother and rounder, with her prominent hip bones from the "before" photograph erased.
Nicky Eaton, the head of press and PR at Condé Nast, which publishes Vogue, GQ, and Glamour, also confirmed that images of models were enhanced to make them appear fuller-figured.
"There have been cases where models are booked way ahead of a shoot and then they turn up two months later looking less healthy and perhaps a bit underweight. We wouldn't be happy showing them that way, so it is then that we would need that person to look a little bit fuller."

Before and after: Shots of Cameron Diaz show the extent of manipulation
Face
: Cheeks appear filled out
Bust: Levelled
Thighs: Wider in the picture on the right
Hip: The bony definition has been smoothed away
Stomach: A fuller, more natural look
Arms: A bit more bulk in the arms and shoulders



But Susan Ringwood, the chief executive of the eating disorder charity Beat, condemned the practice. "Altering models' bodies to appear fuller-figured proves that the industry acknowledges there is a serious issue with projecting images of very thin models, but [it is] missing the point," she said. "They should be using naturally healthy models in the first instance, instead of having to make them look that way."
In 2003, Kate Winslet, who has defended fuller-figured women, appeared on the cover of GQ in a picture that had been altered without her knowledge to make her appear much slimmer.
The following year, Keira Knightley was shocked after appearing with an enhanced bust on posters for the film King Arthur. Last year, however, she dismissed reports that her image in adverts for Chanel's Coco Mademoiselle perfume had been enhanced, despite speculation that she was made to look curvier.
This month, the Periodical Publishers Association (PPA), which represents the magazine industry, appealed for the introduction of a voluntary code regulating the use of digital manipulation and is to hold discussions on the issue with magazine editors.



Now fashion mags make models 'fatter' - Telegraph
qwerty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 13th, 2008, 10:06 AM   #2 (permalink)
MrsDark
Elite Member
 
MrsDark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,836
Default

Oh hell yeah, Cameron looks sooo much fatter in that after pic.
__________________
My Posts Have Won Awards. Can Any Of You Claim The Same? -ur_next_ex
MrsDark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 13th, 2008, 10:12 AM   #3 (permalink)
qwerty
Elite Member
 
qwerty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,594
Default

She's a little meatier!
qwerty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 13th, 2008, 10:37 AM   #4 (permalink)
MrsDark
Elite Member
 
MrsDark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,836
Default

But not much at all. They just smoothed out her bony prominences and cleaned up her shitty complexion. I think they should leave them exactly as they are. If thin suddenly looks like shit then they can look for people to photograph or make celebs who fit the new ideals. And she can either gain weight or be someone to take a proud "I'm thin and I'm proud" stance against the supposed (but probably fake) backlash.
__________________
My Posts Have Won Awards. Can Any Of You Claim The Same? -ur_next_ex
MrsDark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 13th, 2008, 12:49 PM   #5 (permalink)
Laurent
Elite Member
 
Laurent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Out There
Posts: 15,659
Default

Most of what they did to Cameron was to her face, I think. They definately evened out her skin tone and made her eyes bluer. Other than smoothing out that man pelvis of hers, I can't tell that they did much to her body.
Laurent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 13th, 2008, 02:20 PM   #6 (permalink)
Cali
Elite Member
 
Cali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: citizen of the world
Posts: 4,216
Default

This is true though. You'd be shocked to see how bony many models actually look. You can see all the bones in their chest and its routinely Photoshopped out, while leaving their arms and legs slim. Its so misleading.
Cali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 13th, 2008, 05:24 PM   #7 (permalink)
Melyanna
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,403
Default

She looks smoother, but certainly not fatter.
Likr Calimoonchild said. models look extremely bony, and bones don't look good, so they smooth them.
And, of course, they add boobs.
Melyanna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 13th, 2008, 05:30 PM   #8 (permalink)
qwerty
Elite Member
 
qwerty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,594
Default

I'm not sure Cameron was a good example for this article. I don't think anyone thinks she's too thin hence the minor alterations. I'd like to see how much meat they add to a scary skinny model.
qwerty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 13th, 2008, 05:43 PM   #9 (permalink)
dangerous
Elite Member
 
dangerous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,710
Default

Please. In retouch they've always smoothed out the skin. And they
just gave her what is more ideal as a 'perfect body shape'. Her hips
look too narrow for a woman in the first image, and the visible
muscle is distracting and masculine, so of course they are going to
make corrections. Does she look fatter? not at all! If you look closely
at her torso just below the bustline, you can tell they gave her a
more hourglass shape by sucking in her waist a bit. They forgot to
mention that! This article is so lame, the stupidity of it makes me
want to vomit.
dangerous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 13th, 2008, 07:25 PM   #10 (permalink)
Voodoo Child
Elite Member
 
Voodoo Child's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sweet Down Under!
Posts: 11,671
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrsDark View Post
Oh hell yeah, Cameron looks sooo much fatter in that after pic.
Hmmm twas thinking the same thing.
Voodoo Child is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 14th, 2008, 12:06 AM   #11 (permalink)
Fluffy
Elite Member
 
Fluffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,602
Default

Looks like standard airbrushing here. I've seen some better examples of major differences in before/after photoshop. Can't remember where though...
Fluffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 14th, 2008, 01:00 AM   #12 (permalink)
Buffy Burnett
Gold Member
 
Buffy Burnett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 889
Default

Wow! She looks downright fug before the airbrush...and she normally looks kinda hot. Cam, it's time to stay away from the sun--forever! The shoe-leather look is sooo unflatering and you're heading there now. Very sad.
Buffy Burnett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 14th, 2008, 01:38 AM   #13 (permalink)
Fluffy
Elite Member
 
Fluffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,602
Default

^I know! It's one thing I just don't understand--she's a multi-millionaire who could afford world-class skin care. Why? Why?!?
Fluffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 14th, 2008, 09:42 AM   #14 (permalink)
Tati
Elite Member
 
Tati's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Your Pocket
Posts: 8,240
Default

Quote:
If you look closely
at her torso just below the bustline, you can tell they gave her a
more hourglass shape by sucking in her waist a bit.
That's a good point. I was thinking her right thigh did look a teeny bit meatier, but her torso is actually slimmer in the After photo! What a poor example for this article. Do your research, Becky!
__________________
If you reveal your secrets to the wind you should not blame the wind for revealing them to the trees.

- Kahlil Gibran
Tati is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 14th, 2008, 10:36 AM   #15 (permalink)
witchcurlgirl
Elite Member
 
witchcurlgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sittin' Here In Limbo
Posts: 8,485
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fluffy View Post
^I know! It's one thing I just don't understand--she's a multi-millionaire who could afford world-class skin care. Why? Why?!?
Because medicine is not perfect and she suffers from bad acne. I feel bad for people that really have bad skin, as it's pretty tough on them.
__________________
Eve was framed.
witchcurlgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fashion models at Valentino MarieAntoinette Just Plain Scary 33 June 22nd, 2007 01:45 PM
Skinny models defend skinny models: go back to your office, fattie. buttmunch News 41 October 4th, 2006 03:32 PM
Spain bans skinny models from fashion show twitchy News 19 September 20th, 2006 09:16 PM
We're fat and getting fatter! AliceInWonderland News 13 August 30th, 2006 01:31 PM
The Killer's Brandon Flowers to make a fashion line at Walmart? SVZ Gossip Archive 1 October 31st, 2005 08:19 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
Design by JP33