So Long Skinny - Star! Magazine

**mia981** · November 6th, 2005, 03:28 PM

**Lobelia** · November 6th, 2005, 03:32 PM

They all look great now, except Janet is too heavy. She was never too skinny before. Thank God Whitney is looking like a human being now.

**sarahphim** · November 6th, 2005, 03:35 PM

Wow! Lindsey looks so much better, but how recent is that picture? In that one of her as a brunette earlier this week she looked reallllly skinny. Whitney looks good, too.

**muchlove** · November 6th, 2005, 03:51 PM

Lindsay looked a lot closer to 100 lbs than 117 lbs, before. 117 isn't low enough to make you look half dead.

Anyone else think they're a little off on their numbers here? They've got Jessica looking thin but healthy at 5'3" and 112, but Lindsay is skeletal at 110 and 5'5"?

**suede** · November 6th, 2005, 04:00 PM

All but Janet, look better.

**inebriatta** · November 6th, 2005, 04:24 PM

Janet is freaking me out!

**NawdleZouss** · November 6th, 2005, 04:38 PM

Let's hope this trend sticks around for a good long time.

**MaryJane** · November 6th, 2005, 05:02 PM

I think that Lindsay's 2nd pic is older than the 1st. At the moment she's "bigger" than pic 1 but smaller than pic 2.
And also (2nd pic) I don't think she's had that particular hair colour for ages, so to me that's definitely older.

***trina*** · November 6th, 2005, 05:06 PM

It's good to see that they are comming back to their senses!They look so much better.

**barbiedoll25** · November 6th, 2005, 05:07 PM

No wonder there are so many eating disorders in Hollywood and the rest of the US! What a horrible magazine article. I mean, I know they are celebs and are fair game for scruitny and blahblah, our criticism, but I know I would be soooo upset if they had a split picture of myself for the world to see, saying I was no longer "skinny". Come on, the title of the article makes it seem they are now FATASSES even though they clearly are not.

**AliceInWonderland** · November 6th, 2005, 05:13 PM

omg they are soooo off on the "fat" weights and probably the skinny ones too! The skinny weights are listed as too high and the "fat" weights are too high too, what do they think that we are stupid

and now that those girls see this they're just gonna fet skinny again!
LIndz "fat" more likely 120lbs
Jessica "fat" more likely 115lbs
whitney "fat" more likely 130lbs cause shes taller
and Daryl hannah's prob right though cause she's tall too
and I think thats just a really bad pic of poor Janet but she's probably up there in weight too but she's a shorty so more like 160lbs.

**muchlove** · November 6th, 2005, 05:20 PM

THANK YOU!^ They are so far off.

**miss_perfect** · November 6th, 2005, 05:21 PM

Originally Posted by barbiedoll25

No wonder there are so many eating disorders in Hollywood and the rest of the US! What a horrible magazine article. I mean, I know they are celebs and are fair game for scruitny and blahblah, our criticism, but I know I would be soooo upset if they had a split picture of myself for the world to see, saying I was no longer "skinny". Come on, the title of the article makes it seem they are now FATASSES even though they clearly are not.

ITA. What better what to make them go back to their bad habits?

**beauty_lies8** · November 6th, 2005, 06:22 PM

Originally Posted by barbiedoll25

No wonder there are so many eating disorders in Hollywood and the rest of the US! What a horrible magazine article. I mean, I know they are celebs and are fair game for scruitny and blahblah, our criticism, but I know I would be soooo upset if they had a split picture of myself for the world to see, saying I was no longer "skinny". Come on, the title of the article makes it seem they are now FATASSES even though they clearly are not.

my thoughts exactly.

**olivia720** · November 6th, 2005, 06:57 PM

ok, if janet is 160 lbs in that pic, im a monkey's uncle. looks like a lot more to me.
and how the hell would they know these numbers? they're just pulling them out of their asses.