November 6th, 2005, 03:28 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,467
|
So Long Skinny - Star! Magazine
|
|
|
November 6th, 2005, 03:32 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southern US
Posts: 12,330
|
They all look great now, except Janet is too heavy. She was never too skinny before. Thank God Whitney is looking like a human being now.
__________________
ack
Oh, and bitch is crazy... she certainly didn't have to kill the poor porn-loving bastard. ~ Aella
|
|
|
November 6th, 2005, 03:35 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 177
|
Wow! Lindsey looks so much better, but how recent is that picture? In that one of her as a brunette earlier this week she looked reallllly skinny. Whitney looks good, too.
|
|
|
November 6th, 2005, 03:51 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,242
|
Lindsay looked a lot closer to 100 lbs than 117 lbs, before. 117 isn't low enough to make you look half dead.
Anyone else think they're a little off on their numbers here? They've got Jessica looking thin but healthy at 5'3" and 112, but Lindsay is skeletal at 110 and 5'5"?
|
|
|
November 6th, 2005, 04:00 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,838
|
All but Janet, look better.
__________________
He who knows does not speak.
He who speaks does not know.
Lao-tzu
|
|
|
November 6th, 2005, 04:24 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Silver Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 266
|
Janet is freaking me out!
__________________
|
|
|
November 6th, 2005, 04:38 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In a space-dye vest
Posts: 2,848
|
Let's hope this trend sticks around for a good long time.
|
|
|
November 6th, 2005, 05:02 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 6,853
|
I think that Lindsay's 2nd pic is older than the 1st. At the moment she's "bigger" than pic 1 but smaller than pic 2.
And also (2nd pic) I don't think she's had that particular hair colour for ages, so to me that's definitely older.
|
|
|
November 6th, 2005, 05:06 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In my backyard throwing rocks at airplanes..
Posts: 815
|
It's good to see that they are comming back to their senses!They look so much better.
|
|
|
November 6th, 2005, 05:07 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Silver Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Beach
Posts: 536
|
No wonder there are so many eating disorders in Hollywood and the rest of the US! What a horrible magazine article. I mean, I know they are celebs and are fair game for scruitny and blahblah, our criticism, but I know I would be soooo upset if they had a split picture of myself for the world to see, saying I was no longer "skinny". Come on, the title of the article makes it seem they are now FATASSES even though they clearly are not.
|
|
|
November 6th, 2005, 05:13 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lost Angeles
Posts: 23,493
|
omg they are soooo off on the "fat" weights and probably the skinny ones too! The skinny weights are listed as too high and the "fat" weights are too high too, what do they think that we are stupid  and now that those girls see this they're just gonna fet skinny again!
LIndz "fat" more likely 120lbs
Jessica "fat" more likely 115lbs
whitney "fat" more likely 130lbs cause shes taller
and Daryl hannah's prob right though cause she's tall too
and I think thats just a really bad pic of poor Janet but she's probably up there in weight too but she's a shorty so more like 160lbs.
__________________
MY VAG IS ENTRANCE ONLY! "I measure success by the degree to which I ruin other people's lives." -Gary Oldman  In any case as always: I BLAME BUSH!
Last edited by AliceInWonderland : November 7th, 2005 at 11:39 AM.
|
|
|
November 6th, 2005, 05:20 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,242
|
THANK YOU!^ They are so far off.
|
|
|
November 6th, 2005, 05:21 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: F-Hell-A
Posts: 3,364
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by barbiedoll25
No wonder there are so many eating disorders in Hollywood and the rest of the US! What a horrible magazine article. I mean, I know they are celebs and are fair game for scruitny and blahblah, our criticism, but I know I would be soooo upset if they had a split picture of myself for the world to see, saying I was no longer "skinny". Come on, the title of the article makes it seem they are now FATASSES even though they clearly are not.
|
ITA. What better what to make them go back to their bad habits?
|
|
|
November 6th, 2005, 06:22 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: College Campus
Posts: 1,243
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by barbiedoll25
No wonder there are so many eating disorders in Hollywood and the rest of the US! What a horrible magazine article. I mean, I know they are celebs and are fair game for scruitny and blahblah, our criticism, but I know I would be soooo upset if they had a split picture of myself for the world to see, saying I was no longer "skinny". Come on, the title of the article makes it seem they are now FATASSES even though they clearly are not.
|
my thoughts exactly.
|
|
|
November 6th, 2005, 06:57 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wisconsin, United States
Posts: 6,362
|
ok, if janet is 160 lbs in that pic, im a monkey's uncle. looks like a lot more to me.
and how the hell would they know these numbers? they're just pulling them out of their asses.
__________________
"God, excuse my beauty!" --Steven, the Arizona tranny
Last edited by olivia720 : November 6th, 2005 at 07:07 PM.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 PM.
|