Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: So Long Skinny - Star! Magazine

  1. #1
    Gold Member mia981's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,467

    Default So Long Skinny - Star! Magazine





  2. #2
    Elite Member Lobelia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    a backwards hillbilly state
    Posts
    20,800

    Default

    They all look great now, except Janet is too heavy. She was never too skinny before. Thank God Whitney is looking like a human being now.
    "I've cautiously embraced jeggings"
    Emma Peel aka Pacific Breeze aka Wilde1 aka gogodancer aka maribou

    Yip, yip, yip in your tiny indignation. Bark furiously on, lady dog.

  3. #3
    Bronze Member sarahphim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    180

    Default

    Wow! Lindsey looks so much better, but how recent is that picture? In that one of her as a brunette earlier this week she looked reallllly skinny. Whitney looks good, too.

  4. #4
    Elite Member muchlove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    6,241

    Default

    Lindsay looked a lot closer to 100 lbs than 117 lbs, before. 117 isn't low enough to make you look half dead.

    Anyone else think they're a little off on their numbers here? They've got Jessica looking thin but healthy at 5'3" and 112, but Lindsay is skeletal at 110 and 5'5"?

  5. #5
    Elite Member suede's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    4,580

    Default

    All but Janet, look better.
    He who knows does not speak.
    He who speaks does not know.
    Lao-tzu

  6. #6
    Silver Member inebriatta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    266

    Default

    Janet is freaking me out!

  7. #7
    Elite Member NawdleZouss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In a space-dye vest
    Posts
    2,847

    Default

    Let's hope this trend sticks around for a good long time.

  8. #8
    Elite Member MaryJane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    7,379

    Default

    I think that Lindsay's 2nd pic is older than the 1st. At the moment she's "bigger" than pic 1 but smaller than pic 2.
    And also (2nd pic) I don't think she's had that particular hair colour for ages, so to me that's definitely older.

  9. #9
    Gold Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    817

    Default

    It's good to see that they are comming back to their senses!They look so much better.

  10. #10
    Gold Member barbiedoll25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In an alcoholic haze
    Posts
    742

    Default

    No wonder there are so many eating disorders in Hollywood and the rest of the US! What a horrible magazine article. I mean, I know they are celebs and are fair game for scruitny and blahblah, our criticism, but I know I would be soooo upset if they had a split picture of myself for the world to see, saying I was no longer "skinny". Come on, the title of the article makes it seem they are now FATASSES even though they clearly are not.

  11. #11
    Hit By Ban Bus! AliceInWonderland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    you already know.
    Posts
    44,439

    Default

    omg they are soooo off on the "fat" weights and probably the skinny ones too! The skinny weights are listed as too high and the "fat" weights are too high too, what do they think that we are stupid and now that those girls see this they're just gonna fet skinny again!
    LIndz "fat" more likely 120lbs
    Jessica "fat" more likely 115lbs
    whitney "fat" more likely 130lbs cause shes taller
    and Daryl hannah's prob right though cause she's tall too
    and I think thats just a really bad pic of poor Janet but she's probably up there in weight too but she's a shorty so more like 160lbs.
    Last edited by AliceInWonderland; November 7th, 2005 at 11:39 AM.

  12. #12
    Elite Member muchlove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    6,241

    Default

    THANK YOU!^ They are so far off.

  13. #13
    Elite Member miss_perfect's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    F-Hell-A
    Posts
    3,364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by barbiedoll25 View Post
    No wonder there are so many eating disorders in Hollywood and the rest of the US! What a horrible magazine article. I mean, I know they are celebs and are fair game for scruitny and blahblah, our criticism, but I know I would be soooo upset if they had a split picture of myself for the world to see, saying I was no longer "skinny". Come on, the title of the article makes it seem they are now FATASSES even though they clearly are not.
    ITA. What better what to make them go back to their bad habits?

  14. #14
    Gold Member beauty_lies8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    College Campus
    Posts
    1,243

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by barbiedoll25 View Post
    No wonder there are so many eating disorders in Hollywood and the rest of the US! What a horrible magazine article. I mean, I know they are celebs and are fair game for scruitny and blahblah, our criticism, but I know I would be soooo upset if they had a split picture of myself for the world to see, saying I was no longer "skinny". Come on, the title of the article makes it seem they are now FATASSES even though they clearly are not.
    my thoughts exactly.
    http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/8910/congo36xq.jpg
    la maison est oł le sang est
    avatar credit http://www.livejournal.com/users/teh_indy/

  15. #15
    Elite Member olivia720's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Wisconsin, United States
    Posts
    10,984

    Default

    ok, if janet is 160 lbs in that pic, im a monkey's uncle. looks like a lot more to me.
    and how the hell would they know these numbers? they're just pulling them out of their asses.
    Last edited by olivia720; November 6th, 2005 at 07:07 PM.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 41
    Last Post: October 4th, 2006, 02:32 PM
  2. Replies: 19
    Last Post: August 7th, 2006, 02:58 PM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: July 4th, 2006, 03:37 PM
  4. Replies: 10
    Last Post: October 23rd, 2005, 10:25 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •