Octomom Nadya Suleman reveals her bikini body, insists there was no PS help

**Moongirl** · January 20th, 2010, 11:06 AM

Exclusive: Octomom Nadya Suleman's New Bikini Body & How She Got It
January 20, 2010

Wow — just look at her now!

Octomom Nadya Suleman — down to 120 lbs., from a whopping 270 — dares to bare in a stunning new photo shoot, published exclusively in this week's Star.

The mom-of-14 flaunts her new body just a year after her record-breaking delivery in a stunning set of bikini photos.

Nadya shows what exercise and good diet can do in an eight-page special in the magazine, which hits newsstands today. And she insists there was no help from any plastic surgery.

"No way, I would feel like I cheated," she tells Star. "I wanted to prove to myself that I can do it on my own, naturally. My friends call me Rubber Band because I always snapped back so quickly after my other kids!"

Nadya, who lives in La Habra, Calif. became the first woman in the world to give birth to eight healthy children when she had a Caesarian section in January last year. She has six other children ranging in age from 7 to 3.

Star has exclusive photos of the 34-year-old frolicking on a California beach, exercising and spending time with her octuplets — six boys and two girls — who celebrate their birthday Jan. 26. And in a world exclusive interview, she talks about her personal life as well as details about what she eats and how she works out to maintain her newly-trim figure.

Star Magazine | News | Exclusive: Octomom Nadya Suleman's New Bikini Body & How She Got It

**SunShine23** · January 20th, 2010, 11:11 AM

ok, bod looks good. now whats she gonna do about the face?

**twitchy2.0** · January 20th, 2010, 11:12 AM

My bullshit meter just pegged at the max then broke.

**stef** · January 20th, 2010, 11:31 AM

i get an error page when i follow the link and i can't see any pictures either.

well, maybe that's a good thing...

**Moongirl** · January 20th, 2010, 11:34 AM

Originally Posted by stef

i get an error page when i follow the link and i can't see any pictures either.

well, maybe that's a good thing...

I just tried the link and it worked fine; there are no other pics there other than the one I already posted, you have to have a copy of the magazine to see the rest, I think...

**Palermo** · January 20th, 2010, 11:41 AM

her legs look awful in the sunlight, really loose and flabby. They need to do a hysterectomy on her STAT

**C_is_for_Cookie** · January 20th, 2010, 11:42 AM

Originally Posted by twitchy2.0

My bullshit meter just pegged at the max then broke.

Yup. I've seen those pictures of that poor belly stretched to the max with the litter in there and I doubt it all bounced right back like that.

**MohandasKGanja** · January 20th, 2010, 11:43 AM

Can you guys follow the link below. There are a ton of photos there that might help you decide:

The Superficial - Octomom in a Bikini: This is happening.

**Penny Lane** · January 20th, 2010, 12:51 PM

Any truth in this story is as stretched out as her vajayjay.

**twitchy2.0** · January 20th, 2010, 12:53 PM

I thought they were caesarian births?

**LynnieD** · January 20th, 2010, 12:54 PM

Bitch please!

**Penny Lane** · January 20th, 2010, 01:10 PM

Originally Posted by twitchy2.0

I thought they were caesarian births?

Hush.

**twitchy2.0** · January 20th, 2010, 01:15 PM

Last person who told me to hush got banned.

Just sayin'

**mistify** · January 20th, 2010, 02:03 PM

Originally Posted by twitchy2.0

My bullshit meter just pegged at the max then broke.

exactly this woman (and I use the term loosely) is a fucking liar.. And when does she have time to work out? SHe pisses me off. Why is she on the cover of a magazine again? ewwww... Can you say airbrush and shitloads of PS..

**stella blue** · January 20th, 2010, 04:14 PM

It is not possible to have that body without stretch marks after being that big. So it was either PS or massive amounts of photoshop that made her look like that.