March 25th, 2008, 03:03 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
Posts: 45,267
|
__________________
"I can't help it if their ego suffers bystander trauma from my vivisection of their argument"
|
|
|
March 25th, 2008, 03:41 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Silver Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 309
|
Well, we know you're not!
|
|
|
March 25th, 2008, 03:53 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
Posts: 45,267
|
I'm as serious as Lohan is slutty!
__________________
"I can't help it if their ego suffers bystander trauma from my vivisection of their argument"
|
|
|
March 25th, 2008, 04:00 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cuntopia
Posts: 20,194
|
*skips on through*
business as usual, I see...
__________________
"Beyonce is a fast-moving ball of weave and destruction"
|
|
|
March 25th, 2008, 04:08 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Hit By Ban Bus!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,932
|
Hillarys next move in the inexorable race to the bottom...
Sinclair Refocuses On Obama Drug Allegations
Monday March 24th, 2008 3:04 PM by BHDC Staff
From a blog posting made by Larry Sinclair today: Obama and I have something in common because HE sold cocaine as well. While attacking my decisions in the past, these same people want myself and others to allow Barack Obama to receive votes without being looked at, questioned, or investigated in any matter that David Axelrod does not submit as allowable to the media. Are Barack Obama’s past decisions not important here? Now would someone explain to me, your neighbors and the media in general, why is it that I am placed under this microscope by Obama supporters, and Obama surrogates yet we, as a nation , refuse to question the past of a man asking to be President of the United States. Why is it “a smear campaign” when Obama is asked a direct question regarding his past, yet to question any other candidates past it is called the political process? Why does Obama refuse to answer questions unless they are presented by the campaign’s hand picked media outlets? Why has Barack Obama and David Axelrod refused to turn over records, requested in writing, that are supposed to be open to the public? Barack Obama IS a liar and Barack Obama DID use crack cocaine in November of 1999, and Barack Obama did SELL COCAINE in November 1999, to me, because I gave the money for the cocaine to BARACK OBAMA, and Barack Obama handed the cocaine to me. That is the transaction, and that constitutes Barack Obama selling me cocaine. Big Head DC » Sinclair Refocuses On Obama Drug Allegations
|
|
|
March 25th, 2008, 04:15 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sittin' Here In Limbo
Posts: 8,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ingi
Hillarys next move in the inexorable race to the bottom...
Sinclair Refocuses On Obama Drug Allegations
Monday March 24th, 2008 3:04 PM by BHDC Staff
From a blog posting made by Larry Sinclair today: Obama and I have something in common because HE sold cocaine as well. While attacking my decisions in the past, these same people want myself and others to allow Barack Obama to receive votes without being looked at, questioned, or investigated in any matter that David Axelrod does not submit as allowable to the media. Are Barack Obama’s past decisions not important here? Now would someone explain to me, your neighbors and the media in general, why is it that I am placed under this microscope by Obama supporters, and Obama surrogates yet we, as a nation , refuse to question the past of a man asking to be President of the United States. Why is it “a smear campaign” when Obama is asked a direct question regarding his past, yet to question any other candidates past it is called the political process? Why does Obama refuse to answer questions unless they are presented by the campaign’s hand picked media outlets? Why has Barack Obama and David Axelrod refused to turn over records, requested in writing, that are supposed to be open to the public? Barack Obama IS a liar and Barack Obama DID use crack cocaine in November of 1999, and Barack Obama did SELL COCAINE in November 1999, to me, because I gave the money for the cocaine to BARACK OBAMA, and Barack Obama handed the cocaine to me. That is the transaction, and that constitutes Barack Obama selling me cocaine. Big Head DC » Sinclair Refocuses On Obama Drug Allegations
|
I must be getting glaucoma. I've read this three times, and I cannot find any mention of this being Hillary Clinton's next move except where you have posted it at the top.
__________________
Eve was framed.
|
|
|
March 25th, 2008, 04:16 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
Hit By Ban Bus!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,932
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by witchcurlgirl
I must be getting glaucoma. I've read this three times, and I cannot find any mention of this being Hillary Clinton's next move except where you have posted it at the top.
|
Bob Altman who runs the tabloids used to be an attorney for Hilly.
|
|
|
March 25th, 2008, 04:28 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sittin' Here In Limbo
Posts: 8,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ingi
Bob Altman who runs the tabloids used to be an attorney for Hilly.
|
Googled Bob Altman and Clinton. The only hits I got refer to Bob Altman the film director. More information please.
This Larry Sinclair garbage is old news, if HRC was going to use it, it would have to come from a better source than a crackhead like Larry Sinclair.
__________________
Eve was framed.
|
|
|
March 25th, 2008, 04:34 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
Hit By Ban Bus!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,932
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by witchcurlgirl
Googled Bob Altman and Clinton. The only hits I got refer to Bob Altman the film director. More information please.
This Larry Sinclair garbage is old news, if HRC was going to use it, it would have to come from a better source than a crackhead like Larry Sinclair.
|
try 'Roger C. Altman' Wall Street's Latest Media Whiz; As Tabloid Owner, CBS Adviser Has Practical Experience - New York Times
Democratic Party Official: Clinton Pursuing 'The Tonya Harding Option'
March 25, 2008 3:44 PM
l just spoke with a Democratic Party official, who asked for anonymity so as to speak candidly, who said we in the media are all missing the point of this Democratic fight.
The delegate math is difficult for Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, the official said. But it's not a question of CAN she achieve it. Of course she can, the official said.
The question is -- what will Clinton have to do in order to achieve it?
What will she have to do to Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, in order to eke out her improbable victory?
She will have to "break his back," the official said. She will have to destroy Obama, make Obama completely unacceptable.
"Her securing the nomination is certainly possible - but it will require exercising the 'Tonya Harding option.'" the official said. "Is that really what we Democrats want?"
The Tonya Harding Option -- the first time I've heard it put that way.
It implies that Clinton is so set on ensuring that Obama doesn't get the nomination, not only is she willing to take extra-ruthless steps, but in the end neither she nor Obama win the gold.
(In this metaphor, presumably, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., would be Oksana Baiul. Does that make former President Bill Clinton Jeff Gillooly?)
- jpt
March 25, 2008 Political Punch
|
|
|
March 25th, 2008, 04:36 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
Silver Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 309
|
What a nut!
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 AM.
|