Page 3 of 79 FirstFirst 12345671353 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 1174
Like Tree4054Likes

Thread: Do we still want to talk about this Trump thing?

  1. #31
    Elite Member C_is_for_Cookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4,669

    Default

    They say they watched him win public support for his golf course with grand promises, then watched him break them one by one.
    HWBL, ConstanceSpry and Kittylady like this.
    avatar made by green_queen@LJ

  2. #32
    Elite Member ConstanceSpry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    9,227

    Default

    That ornament thread is gold!

    what size is this? Dimensions
    asked by Derek L. on November 23, 2016

    It's bigly. Tremendously bigly!
    J. Hepper answered on November 24, 2016

    1.0 out of 5 stars Fear on my tree
    ByMath Teacheron November 25, 2016
    I was so looking forward to this amazing ornament, but all hell is breaking loose. Since putting it on my tree, the tree started leaning way over to the right. I can't get it back straight no matter how hard I try ! My angel ornaments all moved to the other side of the tree and continously shiver as if they are afraid. Meanwhile all I hear from the stoopid hat is "you're all 4's so you have nothing to worry about."
    Comment| 34 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?
    'I had to get rid of the kid. The cat was allergic.'

  3. #33
    Elite Member pinkbunnyslippers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    3,950 miles from NYC
    Posts
    6,345

    Default

    I'm sure if someone were to make a Cheeto shaped Christmas ornament, it would sell great, and that company would make much more money even if the sale price was $5.99.
    ConstanceSpry likes this.
    "Fashion is an art, but individuality is the key"

  4. #34
    Elite Member ConstanceSpry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    9,227

    Default

    ^^ An orange turd ornament with a tiny piss-colored wiglet would be even more appropriate.
    'I had to get rid of the kid. The cat was allergic.'

  5. #35
    Elite Member MmeVertigina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Your inner ear
    Posts
    3,545

    Default

    Three Wisconsin Counties Just Admitted They Padded Trump's Win With Fake Votes

    The presidential election of 2016 was the most contentious and bizarre in American history. On top of the vile rhetoric that was spewed by now President-elect Donald Trump, it now appears that certain voting tallies in Wisconsin were hedged in Trump’s favor.A county in Wisconsin named Outagamie County had four precincts in the areas of Cicero, Grand Chute, Bear Creek, and Hortonville which all showed that they had fewer people overall than had voted in the presidential election. This instance, naturally, caused the Internet to fly in a fury claiming, rightly, that voter fraud was taking place. The precincts quickly adjusted their voting totals, which removed over a thousand votes from Donald Trump’s side. What a coincidence, the party which has spent years decrying voter fraud were once again benefiting from voter fraud. Dan Solomon of Fast Company was the first to point this out:

    Follow

    dan solo
    @dansolomon


    Same deal in Hortonville. Trump’s number down by 400+ votes, Clinton’s unchanged. Ballots cast now matches votes counted. 3/x pic.twitter.com/65lsNVMn6x
    9:49 AM - 22 Nov 2016

    The village clerk of Hortonville, Lynn Mischkerm offered an explanation to the discrepancy, which didn’t make much sense at the time and under further analysis was proved to be a falsehood. She said:
    In order to give election returns to the Outagamie County Clerk’s office as quickly as possible the Chief Inspector added together the votes from the election machine tapes. An error was made while keying the numbers on the calculator during this process resulting in an incorrect number of votes reported on Election night. The official process of tallying the votes was completed and rechecked. These vote numbers were recorded and delivered to the Outagamie County Clerk’s office the morning of November 9th. The official tally reflects the accurate votes in the Village.
    To accept this story from Mischkerm one would have to believe that the same error was made in four different counties, and that same error resulted in Donald Trump receiving more votes in each instance. Another conundrum is Hillary Clinton’s vote total did not change before the original numbers were announced, or after they were adjusted due to the Internet’s outrage.
    The point to take away from this entire voting debacle in these little Wisconsin towns is the voter fraud was uncovered because they lazily attempted to give Trump an edge and did not anticipate their villainy being discovered. In other areas of the nation it is entirely possible that similar scenarios transpired, and the individuals involved were smoother in covering their tracks. Therefore it is vitally important for voting recounts to happen across the nation to sort out any other discrepancies which took place. The recounts may well prove that not only did Hillary Clinton win the popular vote, but that she also won the electoral college. The American people are owed, and deserve, fairness in their elections for the sake of the sanctity of the American republic.
    I'm sorry if this font appears huge!

    https://twitter.com/aliasvaughn/stat...208256?lang=en

    @EtifoodMarais @davidegreenwald repeat: village of Hortonville. Election night: T 1369 HRC 493. After? T 904 HRC 493. ALL error in his favor



    FollowCNN questioning if a recount respects democracy. Next upoes proofreading respect English?Does double-checking your work respect math?



    • RETWEETS5,965
    • LIKES8,313


    3:27 PM - 23 Nov 2016

    https://thinkprogress.org/electoral-college-trump-top-lawyers-8a8b6e0ca916#.7fhai7wsb


    Members of the Electoral College should not make Donald Trump the next president unless he sells his companies and puts the proceeds in a blind trust, according to the top ethics lawyers for the last two presidents.Richard Painter, Chief Ethics Counsel for George W. Bush, and Norman Eisen, Chief Ethics Counsel for Barack Obama, believe that if Trump continues to retain ownership over his sprawling business interests by the time the electors meet on December 19, they should reject Trump.

    n an email to ThinkProgress, Eisen explained that “the founders did not want any foreign payments to the president. Period.” This principle is enshrined in
    of the Constitution, which bars office holders from accepting “any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.”

    Debates and other proceedings of the Convention of Virginia : convened at Richmond, on Monday the second day of June, 1788, for the purpose of deliberating on the ConstitutionThis provision was specifically created to prevent the President, most of all, from being corrupted by foreign influences
    Virginia Governor Edmund Jennings Randolph addressed the issue directly during a Constitutional debate in June 1788, noting that a violation of the provision by the President would be grounds for impeachment. (Randolph was also a delegate to the Constitutional Convention.)

    There is another provision against the danger mentioned by the honorable member, of the president receiving emoluments from foreign powers.
    If discovered he may be impeached.If he be not impeached he may be displaced at the end of the four years. By the ninth section, of the first article, “No person holding an office of profit or trust, shall accept of any present or emolument whatever, from any foreign power, without the consent of the representatives of the people” … I consider, therefore, that he is restrained from receiving any present or emoluments whatever. It is impossible to guard better against corruption.”

    Eisen said that Trump’s businesses, foreign and domestic, “are receiving a stream of such payments.” A prime example is Trump’s new hotel in Washington DC which, according to Eisen, is “actively seeking emoluments to Trump: payments from foreign governments for use of the hotel.”

    “The notion that his (through his agents) solicitation of those payments, and the foreign governments making of those payments, is unrelated to his office is laughable,” Eisen added.
    This problem will be repeated “over and over” again with Trump’s other properties and business interests. The only way to cure this Constitutional violation is for Trump to sell his companies and set up a blind trust before he takes office.

    Electors should insist that Trump set up a blind trust as a condition of their vote, Eisen said.
    Another option, however unlikely, is for “Republicans in Congress [to] admit that they endorse Trump’s exploitation of public office for private gain and authorize his emoluments as the Constitution allows.”

    Eisen’s conclusions are shared by Harvard Law Professor Larry Tribe, one of the nation’s preeminent constitutional scholars. Tribe told ThinkProgress that, after extensive research, he concluded that “Trump’s ongoing business dealings around the world would make him the recipient of constitutionally prohibited ‘Emoluments’ from ‘any King, Prince, or foreign State’ — in the original sense of payments and not necessarily presents or gifts — from the very moment he takes the oath.”

    The only solution would be to divest completely from his businesses. Failing that, Tribe elaborated on the consequences:

    Trump would be knowingly breaking his oath of exclusive fealty (under Art. II, Sec.1) to a Constitution whose very first Article (Art. I, Sec. 9) — an Article deliberately designed to prevent any U.S. official,especially the Chief Executive, from being indebted to, or otherwise the recipient of financial remuneration from, any foreign power or entity answerable to such a power — he would be violating as he repeated the words recited by the Chief Justice.

    Tribe said the violation would qualify as one of the “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” that would require Trump to be “removed from Office.”

    This is where the Electoral College comes in. Tribe notes that the Electoral College was “originally conceived by Framers like Alexander Hamilton as a vital safeguard against the assumption of the Presidency by an ‘unfit character’ or one incapable of serving faithfully to ‘execute the Office of President of the United States [and] preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.’”

    “[T]o vote for Trump in the absence of such complete divestment… would represent an abdication of the solemn duties of the 538 Electors,” Tribe said.

    This view is not a position of disgruntled liberals. Richard Painter, Bush’s Chief Ethics Counsel, was in complete agreement with Tribe and Eisen during a recent appearance on CNN.
    There is more at the link.

    Video at link: https://twitter.com/JoltedToad/statu...93006444965888
    Breaking: Trump Foundation admits to violating federal law by using funds to support Trump's campaign, including Iowa and NH
    Last edited by MmeVertigina; November 25th, 2016 at 05:17 PM. Reason: omfg what is wrong with this format? Tried to fix it.

  6. #36
    Elite Member HWBL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    22,422

    Default

    Source NY Times


    Donald Trumpís New York Times Interview: Full Transcript

    By THE NEW YORK TIMESNOV. 23, 2016




    President-elect Donald J. Trump during a meeting at The New York Timesís offices in Manhattan on Tuesday. Credit Hiroko Masuike/The New York Times Following is a transcript of President-elect Donald J. Trumpís interview on Tuesday with reporters, editors and opinion columnists from The New York Times. The transcription was prepared by Liam Stack, Jonah Engel Bromwich, Karen Workman and Tim Herrera of The Times.



    ARTHUR SULZBERGER Jr., publisher of The New York Times: Thank you very much for joining us. And I want to reaffirm this is on the record.


    DONALD J. TRUMP, President-elect of the United States: O.K.


    SULZBERGER: All right, so weíre clear. We had a very nice meeting in the Churchill Room. Youíre a Churchill fan, I hear?


    TRUMP: I am, I am.


    SULZBERGER: Thereís a photo of the great man behind you.


    TRUMP: There was a big thing about the bust that was removed out of the Oval Office.




    SULZBERGER: I heard youíre thinking of putting it back.
    TRUMP: I am, indeed. I am.


    SULZBERGER: Wonderful. So weíve got a good collection here from our newsroom and editorial and our columnists. I just want to say we had a good, quiet, but useful and well-meaning conversation in there. So I appreciate that very much.


    TRUMP: I appreciate it, too.


    SULZBERGER: I thought maybe Iíd start this off by asking if you have anything you would like to start this off with before we move to the easiest questions youíre going to get this administration.
    [laughter]
    Audio Play










    45:27

    The Run-Up Podcast

    Exclusive audioTrump at The Times

    The Run-Up reconstructs an extraordinary session with Mr. Trump, using exclusive audio clips and speaking to two Times journalists who were there.









    TRUMP: O.K. Well, I just appreciate the meeting and I have great respect for The New York Times. Tremendous respect. Itís very special. Always has been very special. I think Iíve been treated very rough. Itís well out there that Iíve been treated extremely unfairly in a sense, in a true sense. I wouldnít only complain about The Times. I would say The Times was about the roughest of all. You could make the case The Washington Post was bad, but every once in a while Iíd actually get a good article. Not often, Dean, but every once in awhile.
    Look, I have great respect for The Times, and Iíd like to turn it around. I think it would make the job I am doing much easier. Weíre working very hard. We have great people coming in. I think youíll be very impressed with the names. Weíll be announcing some very shortly.
    Everybody wanted to do this. People are giving up tremendous careers in order to be subject to you folks and subject to a lot of other folks. But theyíre giving up a lot. I mean some are giving up tremendous businesses in order to sit for four or maybe eight or whatever the period of time is. But I think weíre going to see some tremendous talent, tremendous talent coming in. We have many people for every job. I mean no matter what the job is, we have many incredible people. I think, Reince, you can sort of just confirm that. The quality of the people is very good.


    REINCE PRIEBUS, Mr. Trumpís choice for chief of staff: [inaudible]


    TRUMP: Weíre trying very hard to get the best people. Not necessarily people that will be the most politically correct people, because that hasnít been working. So we have really experts in the field. Some are known and some are not known, but theyíre known within their field as being the best. Thatís very important to me.
    You know, Iíve been given a great honor. Itís been very tough. Itís been 18 months of brutality in a true sense, but we won it. We won it pretty big. The final numbers are coming out. Or I guess theyíre coming out. Michiganís just being confirmed. But the numbers are coming out far beyond what anybodyís wildest expectation was. I donít know if it was us, I mean, we were seeing the kind of crowds and kind of, everything, the kind of enthusiasm we were getting from the people.
    As you probably know, I did many, many speeches that last four-week period. I was just telling Arthur that I went around and did speeches in the pretty much 11 different places, that were, the massive crowds we were getting. If we had a stadium that held ó and most of you, many of you were there ó that held 20,000 people, weíd have 15,000 people outside that couldnít get in.
    So we came up with a good system ó we put up the big screens outside with a very good loudspeaker system and very few people left. I would do, during the last month, two or three a day. Thatís a lot. Because thatís not easy when you have big crowds. Those speeches, thatís not an easy way of life, doing three a day. Then I said the last two days, I want to do six and seven. And Iím not sure anybody has ever done that. But we did six and we did seven and the last one ended at 1 oíclock in the morning in Michigan.
    And we had 31,000 people, 17,000 or 18,000 inside and the rest outside. This massive place in Grand Rapids, I guess. And it was an incredible thing. And I left saying: ĎHow do we lose Michigan? I donít think we can lose Michigan.í
    And the reason I did that, it was set up only a little while before ó because we heard that day that Hillary was hearing that theyíre going to lose Michigan, which hasnít been lost in 38 years. Or something. But 38 years. And they didnít want to lose Michigan. So they went out along with President Obama and Michelle, Bill and Hillary, they went to Michigan late that, sort of late afternoon and I said, ĎLetís go to Michigan.í
    It wasnít on the schedule. So I finished up in New Hampshire and at 10 oíclock I went to Michigan. We got there at 12 oíclock. We started speaking around 12:45, actually, and we had 31,000 people and I said, really, I mean, there are things happening. But we saw it everywhere.
    So we felt very good. we had great numbers. And we thought weíre going to win. We thought we were going to win Florida. We thought we were going to win North Carolina. We did easily, pretty easily. We thought strongly we were going to win Pennsylvania. The problem is nobody had won it and it was known, as you know, the great state that always got away. Every Republican thought they were going to win Pennsylvania for 38 years and they just couldnít win it.
    And I thought we were going to win it. And we won it, we won it, you know, relatively easily, we won it by a number of points. Florida we won by 180,000 ó was that the number, 180?
    Donald Trump By YARA BISHARA and NICOLE FINEMAN 1:28 Trump Meets With The New York Times




    Video Trump Meets With The New York Times

    President-elect Donald J. Trump met with journalists from the newsroom and opinion staff at The New York Times on Tuesday. Here are some of the issues discussed at the meeting.
    By YARA BISHARA and NICOLE FINEMAN on Publish Date November 22, 2016. Photo by Hiroko Masuike/The New York Times. Watch in Times Video Ľ

    • embed



    • Share
    • Tweet




    PRIEBUS: [inaudible]


    TRUMP: More than 180,000 voted, and votes are still coming in from the military, which we are getting about 85 percent of.
    So we won that by a lot of votes and, you know, we had a great victory. We had a great victory. I think it would have been easier because I see every once in awhile somebody says, ĎWell, the popular vote.í Well, the popular vote would have been a lot easier, but itís a whole different campaign. I would have been in California, I would have been in Texas, Florida and New York, and we wouldnít have gone anywhere else. Which is, I mean Iíd rather do the popular vote from the standpoint ó Iíd think weíd do actually as well or better ó itís a whole different campaign. Itís like, if youíre a golfer, itís like match play versus stroke play. Itís a whole different game.
    But I think the popular vote would have been easier in a true sense because youíd go to a few places. I think thatís the genius of the Electoral College. I was never a fan of the Electoral College until now.


    SULZBERGER: Until now.
    [laughter]


    TRUMP: Until now. I guess now I like it for two reasons. What it does do is it gets you out to see states that youíll never see otherwise. Itís very interesting. Like Maine. I went to Maine four times. I went to Maine 2 for one, because everybody was saying you can get to 269 but there is no path to 270. We learned that was false because we ended up with what, three-something.


    PRIEBUS: Iíve got to get, weíve got to get Michigan in.


    TRUMP: But there is no path to 270, you have to get the one in Maine, so we kept going back to Maine and we did get the one in Maine. We kept going to Maine 2, and we went to a lot of states that you wouldnít spend a lot of time in and it does get you ó we actually went to about 22 states, whereas if youíre going for popular vote, youíd probably go to four, or three, it could be three. You wouldnít leave New York. Youíd stay in New York and youíd stay in California. So thereís a certain genius about it. And I like it either way. But itís sort of interesting.
    But we had an amazing period of time. I got to know the country, we have a great country, weíre a great, great people, and the enthusiasm was really incredible. The Los Angeles Times had a poll which was interesting because I was always up in that poll. They had something that is, I guess, a modern-day technique in polling, it was called enthusiasm. They added an enthusiasm factor and my people had great enthusiasm, and Hillaryís people didnít have enthusiasm. And in the end she didnít get the African-American vote and we ended up close to 15 points, as you know. We started off at one, we ended up with almost 15. And more importantly, a lot of people didnít show up, because the African-American community liked me. They liked what I was saying.
    So they didnít necessarily vote for me, but they didnít show up, which was a big problem that she had. I ended up doing very well with women, which was ó which I never understood why I was doing poorly, because weíd go to the rallies and weíd have so many women holding up signs, ďWomen for Trump.Ē But I kept reading polls saying that Iím not doing well with women. I think whoever is doing it here would say that we did very well with women, especially certain women.


    DEAN BAQUET, executive editor of The New York Times: As you describe it, you did do something really remarkable. You energized a lot of people in the country who really wanted change in Washington. But along with that ó and this is going to create a tricky thing for you ó you also energized presumably a smaller number of people who were evidenced at the alt-right convention in Washington this weekend. Who have a very Ö


    TRUMP: I just saw that today.


    BAQUET: So, Iíd love to hear you talk about how youíre going to manage that group of people who actually may not be the larger group but who have an expectation for you and are angry about the country and its ó along racial lines. My first question is, do you feel like you said things that energized them in particular, and how are you going to manage that?


    TRUMP: I donít think so, Dean. First of all, I donít want to energize the group. Iím not looking to energize them. I donít want to energize the group, and I disavow the group. They, again, I donít know if itís reporting or whatever. I donít know where they were four years ago, and where they were for Romney and McCain and all of the other people that ran, so I just donít know, I had nothing to compare it to.
    But itís not a group I want to energize, and if they are energized I want to look into it and find out why.
    What we do want to do is we want to bring the country together, because the country is very, very divided, and thatís one thing I did see, big league. Itís very, very divided, and Iím going to work very hard to bring the country together.
    I mean, Iím somebody that really has gotten along with people over the years. It was interesting, my wife, I went to a big event about two years ago. Just after I started thinking about politics.
    And weíre walking in and some people were cheering and some people were booing, and she said, you know, ĎPeople have never booed for you.í
    Iíve never had a person boo me, and all of a sudden people are booing me. She said, thatís never happened before. And, itís politics. You know, all of a sudden they think Iím going to be running for office, and Iím a Republican, letís say. So itís something that I had never experienced before and I said, ĎThose people are booing,í and she said, ĎYup.í Theyíd never booed before. But now they boo. You know, it was a group and another group was going the opposite.
    No, I want to bring the country together. Itís very important to me. Weíre in a very divided country. In many ways divided.


    BAQUET: So Iím going to do that thing that executive editors get to do which is to invite reporters to jump in and ask questions.


    MAGGIE HABERMAN, political reporter: Iíll start, thank you, Dean. Mr. President, Iíd like to thank you for being here. This morning, Kellyanne Conway talked about not prosecuting
    Hillary Clinton. We were hoping you could talk about exactly what that means ó does that mean just the emails, or the emails and the foundation, and how you came to that decision.




    Mr. Trump leaving The New York Times after meeting with reporters, editors and the publisher, Arthur Sulzberger Jr., on Tuesday. Credit Todd Heisler/The New York Times TRUMP: Well, there was a report that somebody said that Iím not enthused about it. Look, I want to move forward, I donít want to move back. And I donít want to hurt the Clintons. I really donít.
    She went through a lot. And suffered greatly in many different ways. And I am not looking to hurt them at all. The campaign was vicious. They say it was the most vicious primary and the most vicious campaign. I guess, added together, it was definitely the most vicious; probably, I assume you sold a lot of newspapers.
    [laughter]
    I would imagine. I would imagine. Iím just telling you, Maggie, Iím not looking to hurt them. I think theyíve been through a lot. Theyíve gone through a lot.
    Iím really looking Ö I think we have to get the focus of the country into looking forward.


    SULZBERGER: If I could interject, we had a good conversation there, you and I, and it was off the record, but there was nothing secret, just wanted to make sure. The idea of looking forward was one of the themes that you were saying. That we need to now get past the election, right?


    MATTHEW PURDY, deputy managing editor: So youíre definitively taking that off the table? The investigation?


    TRUMP: No, but the question was asked.


    PURDY: About the emails and the foundation?


    TRUMP: No, no, but itís just not something that I feel very strongly about. I feel very strongly about health care. I feel very strongly about an immigration bill that I think even the people in this room can be happy. You know, youíve been talking about immigration bills for 50 years and nothingís ever happened.
    I feel very strongly about an immigration bill thatís fair and just and a lot of other things. There are a lot of things I feel strongly about. Iím not looking to look back and go through this. This was a very painful period. This was a very painful election with all of the email things and all of the foundation things and all of the everything that they went through and the whole country went through. This was a very painful period of time. I read recently where it was, it was, theyíre saying, they used to say it was Lincoln against whoever and none of us were there to see it. And there arenít a lot of recordings of that, right?
    [laughter]
    But the fact is that there were some pretty vicious elections; they say this was, this was the most.

    They say it was definitely the most vicious primary. And I think itís very important to look forward.


    CAROLYN RYAN, senior editor for politics: Do you think it would disappoint your supporters who seemed very animated by the idea of accountability in the Clintons? What would you say to them?


    TRUMP: I donít think they will be disappointed. I think I will explain it, that we have to, in many ways save our country.
    Because our countryís really in bad, big trouble. We have a lot of trouble. A lot of problems. And one of the big problems, I talk about, divisiveness. I think that a lot of people will appreciate Ö Iím not doing it for that reason. Iím doing it because itís time to go in a different direction. There was a lot of pain, and I think that the people that supported me with such enthusiasm, where they will show up at 1 in the morning to hear a speech.
    It was actually Election Day, they showed up at, so that was essentially Election Day. Yeah, I think theyíd understand very completely.


    THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN, opinion columnist: Mr. President-elect, can I ask a question? One of the issues that you actually were very careful not to speak about during the campaign, and havenít spoken about yet, is one very near and dear to my heart, the whole issue of climate change, the Paris agreement, how youíll approach it. You own some of the most beautiful links golf courses in the world Ö
    [laughter, cross talk]


    TRUMP: [laughing] I read your article. Some will be even better because actually like Doral is a little bit off Ö so itíll be perfect. [inaudible] He doesnít say that. He just says that the ones that are near the water will be gone, but Doral will be in great shape.
    [laughter]


    FRIEDMAN: But itís really important to me, and I think to a lot of our readers, to know where youíre going to go with this. I donít think anyone objects to, you know, doing all forms of energy. But are you going to take America out of the worldís lead of confronting climate change?


    TRUMP: Iím looking at it very closely, Tom. Iíll tell you what. I have an open mind to it. Weíre going to look very carefully. Itís one issue thatís interesting because there are few things where thereís more division than climate change. You donít tend to hear this, but there are people on the other side of that issue who are, think, donít even Ö


    SULZBERGER: We do hear it.


    FRIEDMAN: I was on ĎSquawk Boxí with Joe Kernen this morning, so I got an earful of it.
    [laughter]


    TRUMP: Joe is one of them. But a lot of smart people disagree with you. I have a very open mind. And Iím going to study a lot of the things that happened on it and weíre going to look at it very carefully. But I have an open mind.


    SULZBERGER: Well, since weíre living on an island, sir, I want to thank you for having an open mind. We saw what these storms are now doing, right? Weíve seen it personally. Straight up.


    FRIEDMAN: But you have an open mind on this?


    TRUMP: I do have an open mind. And weíve had storms always, Arthur.


    SULZBERGER: Not like this.


    TRUMP: You know the hottest day ever was in 1890-something, 98. You know, you can make lots of cases for different views. I have a totally open mind.
    My uncle was for 35 years a professor at M.I.T. He was a great engineer, scientist. He was a great guy. And he was Ö a long time ago, he had feelings ó this was a long time ago ó he had feelings on this subject. Itís a very complex subject. Iím not sure anybody is ever going to really know. I know we have, they say they have science on one side but then they also have those horrible emails that were sent between the scientists. Where was that, in Geneva or wherever five years ago? Terrible. Where they got caught, you know, so you see that and you say, whatís this all about. I absolutely have an open mind. I will tell you this: Clean air is vitally important. Clean water, crystal clean water is vitally important. Safety is vitally important.
    And you know, you mentioned a lot of the courses. I have some great, great, very successful golf courses. Iíve received so many environmental awards for the way Iíve done, you know. Iíve done a tremendous amount of work where Iíve received tremendous numbers. Sometimes Iíll say Iím actually an environmentalist and people will smile in some cases and other people that know me understand thatís true. Open mind.


    JAMES BENNET, editorial page editor: When you say an open mind, you mean youíre just not sure whether human activity causes climate change? Do you think human activity is or isnít connected?


    TRUMP: I think right now Ö well, I think there is some connectivity. There is some, something. It depends on how much. It also depends on how much itís going to cost our companies. You have to understand, our companies are noncompetitive right now.
    Theyíre really largely noncompetitive. About four weeks ago, I started adding a certain little sentence into a lot of my speeches, that weíve lost 70,000 factories since W. Bush. 70,000. When I first looked at the number, I said: ĎThat must be a typo. It canít be 70, you canít have 70,000, you wouldnít think you have 70,000 factories here.í And it wasnít a typo, itís right. Weíve lost 70,000 factories.
    Weíre not a competitive nation with other nations anymore. We have to make ourselves competitive. Weíre not competitive for a lot of reasons.
    Thatís becoming more and more of the reason. Because a lot of these countries that we do business with, they make deals with our president, or whoever, and then they donít adhere to the deals, you know that. And itís much less expensive for their companies to produce products. So Iím going to be studying that very hard, and I think I have a very big voice in it. And I think my voice is listened to, especially by people that donít believe in it. And weíll let you know.


    FRIEDMAN: Iíd hate to see Royal Aberdeen underwater.


    TRUMP: The North Sea, that could be, thatís a good one, right?


    ELISABETH BUMILLER, Washington bureau chief: I just wanted to follow up on the question you were asked about not pursuing any investigations into Hillary Clinton. Did you mean both the email investigation and the foundation investigation ó you will not pursue either one of those?


    TRUMP: Yeah, look, you know weíll have people that do things but my inclination would be, for whatever power I have on the matter, is to say letís go forward. This has been looked at for so long. Ad nauseam. Letís go forward. And you know, you could also make the case that some good work was done in the foundation and they could have made mistakes, etc. etc. I think itís time, I think itís time for people to say letís go and solve some of the problems that we have, which are massive problems and, you know, I do think that theyíve gone through a lot. I think losing is going through a lot. It was a tough, it was a very tough evening for her. I think losing is going through a lot. So, for whatever itís worth, my, my attitude is strongly we have to go forward, we have so many different problems to solve, I donít think we have to delve back in the past. I also think that would be a very divisive, well I think it would be very divisive, you know Iím talking about bringing together, and then they go into all sorts of stuff, I think it would be very, very divisive for the country.


    SULZBERGER: I agree, I think speaking not as a journalist now, itís very healthy. There, and then weíre going to go


    MICHAEL D. SHEAR, White House correspondent: Mr. Trump, Mike Shear. I cover the White House, covering your administration Ö


    TRUMP: See ya there.
    [laughter]


    SHEAR: Just one quick clarification on the climate change, do you intend to, as you said, pull out of the Paris Climate Ö


    TRUMP: Iím going to take a look at it.


    SHEAR [interrupts]: And if the reaction from foreign leaders is to slap tariffs on American goods to offset the carbon that the United States had pledged to reduce, is that O.K. with you? And then the second question is on your sort of mixing of your global business interests and the presidency. Thereís already, even just in the 10, two weeks youíve been president-elect, instances where youíve met with your Indian business partners Ö



    Graphic: Donald Trump Is Choosing His Cabinet. Hereís the Latest Shortlist.

    TRUMP: Sure.


    SHEAR: Youíve talked about the impact of the wind farms on your golf course. People, experts who are lawyers and ethics experts, say that all of that is totally inappropriate, so I guess the question for you is, what do you see as the appropriate structure for keeping those two things separate, and are there any lines that you think you wonít want to cross once youíre in the White House?


    TRUMP: O.K. First of all, on countries. I think that countries will not do that to us. I donít think if theyíre run by a person that understands leadership and negotiation theyíre in no position to do that to us, no matter what I do. Theyíre in no position to do that to us, and that wonít happen, but Iím going to take a look at it. A very serious look. I want to also see how much this is costing, you know, whatís the cost to it, and Iíll be talking to you folks in the not-too-distant future about it, having to do with what just took place.
    As far as the, you know, potential conflict of interests, though, I mean I know that from the standpoint, the law is totally on my side, meaning, the president canít have a conflict of interest. Thatís been reported very widely. Despite that, I donít want there to be a conflict of interest anyway. And the laws, the president canít. And I understand why the president canít have a conflict of interest now because everything a president does in some ways is like a conflict of interest, but I have, Iíve built a very great company and itís a big company and itís all over the world. People are starting to see, when they look at all these different jobs, like in India and other things, number one, a job like that builds great relationships with the people of India, so itís all good. But I have to say, the partners come in, theyíre very, very successful people. They come in, theyíd say, they said, ĎWould it be possible to have a picture?í Actually, my children are working on that job. So I can say to them, Arthur, ĎI donít want to have a picture,í or, I can take a picture. I mean, I think itís wonderful to take a picture. Iím fine with a picture. But if it were up to some people, I would never, ever see my daughter Ivanka again. That would be like you never seeing your son again. That wouldnít be good. That wouldnít be good. But Iíd never, ever see my daughter Ivanka.


    UNKNOWN: That means youíd have to make Ivanka deputy President, you know.


    TRUMP: I know, I know, yeah. [room laughs] Well, I couldnít do that either. I canít, that canít work. I canít do anything, I would never see my, I guess the only son Iíd be allowed to see, at least for a little while, would be Barron, because heís 10. But, but, so there has to be [unintelligible]. Itís a very interesting case.


    UNKNOWN: You could sell your company though, right? With all due respect, you could sell your company and then Ö


    TRUMP: Well Ö


    UNKNOWN: And then you could see them all the time.


    TRUMP: Thatís a very hard thing to do, you know what, because I have real estate. I have real estate all over the world, which now people are understanding. When I filed my forms with the federal election, people said, ĎWow thatís really a big company, thatís a big company.í It really is big, itís diverse, itís all over the world. Itís a great company with great assets. I think that, you know, selling real estate isnít like selling stock. Selling real estate is much different, itís in a much different world. Iíd say this, and I mean this and I said it on ď60 MinutesĒ the other night: My company is so unimportant to me relative to what Iím doing, ícause I donít need money, I donít need anything, and by the way, Iím very under-leveraged, I have a very small percentage of my money in debt, very very small percentage of my money in debt, in fact, banks have said ĎWeíd like to loan you money, weíd like to give you any amount of money.í Iíve been there before, Iíve had it both ways, Iíve been over-levered, Iíve been under-levered and, especially as you get older, under-levered is much better.


    UNKNOWN: Mr. President-elect Ö


    TRUMP: Just a minute, because itís an important question. I donít care about my company. I mean, if a partner comes in from India or if a partner comes in from Canada, where we did a beautiful big building that just opened, and they want to take a picture and come into my office, and my kids come in and, I originally made the deal with these people, I mean what am I going to say? Iím not going to talk to you, Iím not going to take pictures? You have to, you know, on a human basis, you take pictures. But I just want to say that I am given the right to do something so important in terms of so many of the issues we discussed, in terms of health care, in terms of so many different things. I donít care about my company. It doesnít matter. My kids run it. Theyíll say I have a conflict because we just opened a beautiful hotel on Pennsylvania Avenue, so every time somebody stays at that hotel, if they stay because Iím president, I guess you could say itís a conflict of interest. Itís a conflict of interest, but again, Iím not going to have anything to do with the hotel, and they may very well. I mean it could be that occupancy at that hotel will be because, psychologically, occupancy at that hotel will be probably a more valuable asset now than it was before, O.K.? The brand is certainly a hotter brand than it was before. I canít help that, but I donít care. I said on ď60 MinutesĒ: I donít care. Because it doesnít matter. The only thing that matters to me is running our country.


    MICHAEL BARBARO, political reporter: Mr. President-elect, can I press you a little further on what structures you would put in place to keep the presidency and the company separate and to avoid things that, for example, were reported in The Times in the past 24 hours about meeting with leaders of Brexit about wind farms Ö


    TRUMP: About meeting with who?


    BARBARO: Leaders of Brexit about wind farms that might interfere with the views of your golf course and how to keep, what structures, can you talk about that meeting, by the way?


    TRUMP: Was I involved with the wind farms recently? Or, not that I know of. I mean, I have a problem with wind Ö


    BARBARO: But you brought it up in the meeting, didnít you?


    TRUMP: Which meeting? I donít know. I might have.


    BARBARO: With leaders of Brexit.


    MANY VOICES: With Farage.


    TRUMP: Oh, I see. I might have brought it up. But not having to do with me, just I mean, the wind is a very deceiving thing. First of all, we donít make the windmills in the United States. Theyíre made in Germany and Japan. Theyíre made out of massive amounts of steel, which goes into the atmosphere, whether itís in our country or not, it goes into the atmosphere. The windmills kill birds and the windmills need massive subsidies. In other words, weíre subsidizing wind mills all over this country. I mean, for the most part they donít work. I donít think they work at all without subsidy, and that bothers me, and they kill all the birds. You go to a windmill, you know in California they have the, what is it? The golden eagle? And theyíre like, if you shoot a golden eagle, they go to jail for five years and yet they kill them by, they actually have to get permits that theyíre only allowed to kill 30 or something in one year. The windmills are devastating to the bird population, O.K. With that being said, thereís a place for them. But they do need subsidy. So, if I talk negatively. Iíve been saying the same thing for years about you know, the wind industry. I wouldnít want to subsidize it. Some environmentalists agree with me very much because of all of the things I just said, including the birds, and some donít. But itís hard to explain. I donít care about anything having to do with anything having to do with anything other than the country.


    BARBARO: But the structures, just to be clear, thatís the question. How do you formalize the separation of these things so that there is not a question of whether or not you as president Ö


    TRUMP: O.K.


    BARBARO: Ö are trying to influence something, like wind farms?


    TRUMP: O.K., I donít want to influence anything, because itís not that, itís not that important to me. Itís hard to explain.


    BARBARO: Yes, but the structures?


    TRUMP: Now, according to the law, see I figured thereís something where you put something in this massive trust and thereís also ó nothing is written. In other words, in theory, I can be president of the United States and run my business 100 percent, sign checks on my business, which I am phasing out of very rapidly, you know, I sign checks, Iím the old-fashioned type. I like to sign checks so I know what is going on as opposed to pressing a computer button, boom, and thousands of checks are automatically sent. It keeps, it tells me whatís going on a little bit and it tells contractors that Iím watching. But I am phasing that out now, and handing that to Eric Trump and Don Trump and Ivanka Trump for the most part, and some of my executives, so thatís happening right now.
    But in theory I could run my business perfectly, and then run the country perfectly. And thereís never been a case like this where somebodyís had, like, if you look at other people of wealth, they didnít have this kind of asset and this kind of wealth, frankly. Itís just a different thing.
    But there is no ó I assumed that youíd have to set up some type of trust or whatever and you know. And I was actually a little bit surprised to see it. So in theory I donít have to do anything. But I would like to do something. I would like to try and formalize something, because I donít care about my business.
    Doral is going to run very nice. We own this incredible place in Miami. We own many incredible places, including Turnberry, I guess you heard. Thereís one guy that does ó when I say Turnberry, you know what that is, right. Do a little [inaudible]. But theyíre going to run well, we have good managers, theyíre going to run really well.



    Mr. Trump with New York Times editors and reporters. Credit Hiroko Masuike/The New York Times So I donít have to do anything, but I want to do something if I can. If there is something.


    BARBARO: Can you promise us when you decide exactly what that is, youíll come tell The New York Times about it?

    [laughter]


    TRUMP: I will. Iíve started it already.


    SULZBERGER: One of our great salesmen, by the way.


    TRUMP: I can see that. Iíve started it already by, I mean, Iíve greatly reduced the check-signing and the business. Iíve greatly reduced meetings with contractors, meetings with different people that, you know, Iíve also started by ó ícause Iíve said over the last two years, once I decided I wanted to run, I donít want to build anything. íCause building, like for instance, we built the post office, youíll be happy to hear, ahead of schedule and under budget. Substantially ahead of schedule. Almost two years ago of schedule. But ahead of schedule, under budget, and itís a terrific place. Thatís the hotel on Pennsylvania.


    FRIEDMAN: Just so you know, General Electric has a big wind turbine factory in South Carolina. Just so you know.


    TRUMP: Well thatís good. But most of Ďem are made in Germany, most of Ďem are made, you know, Siemens and the Chinese are making most of them.
    [cross talk]


    TRUMP: They may assemble ó if you check, I think youíll find that the, itís delivered there and they do most of the assembly.


    JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS, White House correspondent: Mr. President-elect ó Iím sorry I entered late, but I did want to ask you about Ö


    BAQUET: You should introduce yourself.


    DAVIS: Iím Julie Davis, one of the White House correspondents.


    TRUMP: Hi, Julie.


    DAVIS: I apologize for my delayed flight. I wanted to ask you about personnel. They say personnel is policy.


    TRUMP: I canít quite hear.


    DAVIS: Personnel.


    TRUMP: Personnel.


    DAVIS: You hired Steve Bannon to be the chief strategist for you in the White House. He is a hero of the alt-right. Heís been described by some as racist and anti-Semitic. I wonder what message you think you have sent by elevating him to that position and what you would say to those who feel like that indicates something about the kind of country you prefer and the government youíll run.


    TRUMP: Um, Iíve known Steve Bannon a long time. If I thought he was a racist, or alt-right, or any of the things that we can, you know, the terms we can use, I wouldnít even think about hiring him. First of all, Iím the one that makes the decision, not Steve Bannon or anybody else. And Kellyanne will tell you that.
    [laughter]


    KELLYANE CONWAY: 100 percent.


    TRUMP: And if he said something to me that, in terms of his views, or that I thought were inappropriate or bad, number one I wouldnít do anything, and number two, he would have to be gone. But I know many people that know him, and in fact, heís actually getting some very good press from a lot of the people that know him, and people that are on the left. But Steve went to Harvard, he was a, you know, he was very successful, he was a Naval officer, heís, I think heís very, very, you know, sadly, really, I think itís very hard on him. I think heís having a hard time with it. Because itís not him. Itís not him.
    Iíve known him for a long time. Heís a very, very smart guy. I think he was with Goldman Sachs on top of everything else.


    UNKNOWN: What do you make of the website he ran, Breitbart?


    TRUMP: The which?


    UNKNOWN: Breitbart.


    TRUMP: Well, Breitbartís different. Breitbart cover things, I mean like The New York Times covers things. I mean, I could say that Arthur is alt-right because they covered an alt-right story.


    SULZBERGER: [laughing] I am, I am. Iíll take whatever you say. I am always right, but Iím not alt-right.

    [laughter, cross talk]


    TRUMP: The New York Times covers a lot of stories that are, you know, rough stories. And you know, they have covered some of these things, but The New York Times covers a lot of these things also. Itís just a newspaper, essentially. Itís a newspaper. I know the guy, heís a decent guy, heís a very smart guy. Heís done a good job. He hasnít been with me that long. You know he really came in after the primaries. I had already won the primaries. And if I thought that his views were in that category, I would immediately let him go. And Iíll tell you why. In many respects I think his views are actually on the other side of what a lot of people might think.


    DAVIS: But you are aware, sir, with all due respect, that African-Americans and Jews and many folks who disagree with the coverage of Breitbart and the slant that Breitbart brings to the news view him that way, arenít you?


    TRUMP: Yeah, well Breitbart, first of all, is just a publication. And, you know, they cover stories like you cover stories. Now, they are certainly a much more conservative paper, to put it mildly, than The New York Times. But Breitbart really is a news organization thatís become quite successful, and itís got readers and it does cover subjects that are on the right, but it covers subjects on the left also. I mean itís a pretty big, itís a pretty big thing. And he helped build it into a pretty successful news organization.



    Graphic: 20 Things Donald Trump Said He Wanted to Get Rid of as President

    Now, Iíll tell you what, I know him very well. I will say this, and I will say this, if I thought that strongly, if I thought that he was doing anything, or had any ideas that were different than the ideas that you would think, I would ask him very politely to leave. But in the meantime, I think heís been treated very unfairly.
    Itís very interesting ícause a lot of people are coming to his defense right now.


    PRIEBUS: We have never experienced a single episode of any of those accusations. Itís been the total opposite. Itís been a great team, and itís just not there. And what the president-elect is saying is 100 percent true.
    [cross talk]


    TRUMP: And by the way, if you see something or get something where you feel that Iím wrong, and you have some info ó I would love to hear it. You can call me, Arthur can call me, I would love to hear. The only one who canít call me is Maureen [Dowd, opinion columnist]. She treats me too rough.
    I donít know what happened to Maureen! She was so good, Gail [Collins, opinion columnist]. For years she was so good.
    [cross talk]


    SULZBERGER: As we all say about Maureen, itís not your fault, itís just your turn.
    [laughter]


    ROSS DOUTHAT, opinion columnist: I have a slightly different, but somewhat Steve Bannon-related question, I guess. Itís about the future of the Republican Party. You started out here talking about winning in so many states where no Republican has won in decades, especially Midwestern Rust Belt states. And I think many people think that one of the reasons you won was that you deliberately campaigned as a different kind of Republican. You had different things to say on trade, entitlements, foreign policy, even your daughter Ivankaís child care plan was sort of distinctive. And now youíre in a situation where youíre governing and staffing up an administration with a Republican Party whose leaders, and Reince, may differ with me a little on this, but donít always see eye-to-eye on those views.


    TRUMP: Although right now theyíre loving me.

    [laughter]


    UNKNOWN: Well, right now they are.

    [cross talk]


    TRUMP: Paul Ryan right now loves me, Mitch McConnell loves me, itís amazing how winning can change things. Iíve liked Chuck Schumer for a long time. Iíve actually, Iíve raised a lot of money for Chuck and given him a lot of money over the years. I think I was the first person that ever contributed to Chuck Schumer. I had a Brooklyn office, a little office, in a little apartment building in Brooklyn in Sheepshead Bay where I worked with my father.
    And Chuck Schumer came in and I gave him, I believe, I donít know if heís willing to admit this, but I believe it was his first campaign contribution, $500. But Chuck Schumerís a good guy. I think weíll get along very well.


    DOUTHAT: I guess thatís my question is, how much do you expect to be able to both run an administration and negotiate with a Republican-led Congress as a different kind of Republican. And do you worry that youíll wake up three years from now and go back to campaigning in the Rust Belt and people will say, well, he governed more like Paul Ryan than like Donald Trump.


    TRUMP: No, I donít worry about that. íCause I didnít need to do this. I was telling Arthur before: ĎArthur I didnít need to do this. Iím doing this to do a good job.í Thatís what I want to do, and I think that what happened in the Rust Belt, they call it the Rust Belt for a reason. If you go through it, you look back 20 years, they didnít used to call it the Rust Belt. You pass factory after factory after factory thatís empty and rusting. Rust is the good part, ícause theyíre worse than rusting, theyíre falling down. No, I wouldnít sacrifice that. To me more important is taking care of the people that really have proven to be, to love Donald Trump, as opposed to the political people. And frankly if the political people donít take care of these people, theyíre not going to win and youíre going to end up with maybe a total different kind of government than what youíre looking at right now. These people are really angry. Theyíre smart, theyíre workers, and theyíre angry. I call them the forgotten men and women. And I use that in speeches, I say theyíre the forgotten people ó they were totally forgotten. And weíre going to bring jobs back. Weíre going to bring jobs back, big league. Iíve spoken to so many companies already, I say, donít plan on moving your company, ícause youíre not going to be able to move your company and sell us your product. You think youíre going to just sell it across what will be a strong border, you know at least weíre going to have a border. But just donít plan on it.
    And Iíll tell you, I believe, and youíll hear announcements over the next couple of months, but I believe Iíve talked numerous comp ó in four-minute conversations with top people ó numerous companies that have, leaving, or potentially leaving our country with thousands of jobs.


    FRIEDMAN: Are you worried, though, that those companies will keep their factories here, but the jobs will be replaced by robots?


    TRUMP: They will, and weíll make the robots too.
    [laughter]


    TRUMP: Itís a big thing, weíll make the robots too. Right now we donít make the robots. We donít make anything. But weíre going to, I mean, look, robotics is becoming very big and weíre going to do that. Weíre going to have more factories. We canít lose 70,000 factories. Just canít do it. Weíre going to start making things.
    I was honored yesterday, I got a call from Bill Gates, great call, we had a great conversation, I got a call from Tim Cook at Apple, and I said, ĎTim, you know one of the things that will be a real achievement for me is when I get Apple to build a big plant in the United States, or many big plants in the United States, where instead of going to China, and going to Vietnam, and going to the places that you go to, youíre making your product right here.í He said, ĎI understand that.í I said: ĎI think weíll create the incentives for you, and I think youíre going to do it. Weíre going for a very large tax cut for corporations, which youíll be happy about.í But weíre going for big tax cuts, we have to get rid of regulations, regulations are making it impossible. Whether youíre liberal or conservative, I mean I could sit down and show you regulations that anybody would agree are ridiculous. Itís gotten to be a free-for-all. And companies canít, they canít even start up, they canít expand, theyíre choking.
    I tell you, one thing I would say, so, Iím giving a big tax cut and Iím giving big regulation cuts, and Iíve seen all of the small business owners over the United States, and all of the big business owners, Iíve met so many people. They are more excited about the regulation cut than about the tax cut. And I wouldíve never said thatís possible, because the tax cutís going to be substantial. You know we have companies leaving our country because the taxes are too high. But theyíre leaving also because of the regulations. And I would say, of the two, and I would not have thought this, regulation cuts, substantial regulation cuts, are more important than, and more enthusiastically supported, than even the big tax cuts.


    UNKNOWN: Mr. President-elect, I wanted to ask you, there was a conference this past weekend in Washington of people who pledged their allegiance to Nazism.


    TRUMP: Boy, you are really into this stuff, huh?


    PRIEBUS: I think we answered that one right off the bat.



    Interactive Feature: Trump Tower, the Center of the Political Universe

    UNKNOWN: Are you going to condemn them?


    TRUMP: Of course I did, of course I did.


    PRIEBUS: He already did.


    UNKNOWN: Are you going to do it right now?


    TRUMP: Oh, I see, maybe you werenít here. Sure. Would you like me to do it here? Iíll do it here. Of course I condemn. I disavow and condemn.


    SULZBERGER: Weíll go with that. Iíd like to move to infrastructure, apologies, and then weíll go back. Because a lot of the investment you are talking about, a lot of the jobs you are talking about ó is infrastructure going to be the core of your first few years?


    TRUMP: No, itís not the core, but itís an important factor. Weíre going for a lot of things, between taxes, between regulations, between health care replacement, weíre going to talk repeal and replace. íCause health care is ó you know people are paying a 100 percent increase and theyíre not even getting anything, the deductibles are so high, you have deductibles $16,000. So theyíre paying all of this money and they donít even get health care. So itís very important. So there are a lot of things. But infrastructure, Arthur, is going to be a part of it.


    SULZBERGER: Itís part of jobs, isnít it?


    TRUMP: I donít even think itís a big part of it. Itís going to be a big number but I think I am doing things that are more important than infrastructure, but infrastructure is still a part of it, and weíre talking about a very large-scale infrastructure bill. And thatís not a very Republican thing ó I didnít even know that, frankly.


    SULZBERGER: It worked for Franklin Roosevelt.


    TRUMP: It didnít work for Obama because unfortunately they didnít spend the money last time on infrastructure. They spent it on a lot of other things. You know, nobody can find out where that last ó you know, from a few years ago ó where that money went. And weíre going to make sure it is spent on infrastructure and roads and highways. I have a friend, heís a big trucker, one of the biggest. And he orders these incredible trucks, the best, I wonít mention the name but itís a certain truck company that makes ó they call them the Rolls-Royce of trucks. You know, the most expensive trucks. And he calls me up about two months ago and he goes, ĎMan, Iím going to buy the cheapest trucks I can buy.í And I said, ĎWhy?í and ó you know, and this is the biggest guy ó he goes, ĎMy trucks are coming back, theyíre going from New York to California and theyíre all busted up. The highways are in such bad shape, theyíre hitting potholes, theyíre hitting everything.í He said, ĎIím not buying these trucks anymore, Iím going to buy the cheapest stuff and the strongest tires I can get.í Thatís the exact expression he used, Ďthe cheapest trucks and the strongest tires.í
    Weíre hitting so many bad points, we, you know, I said, ĎSo tell me, youíve been doing this how long?í 45 years. He built it over 45 years. I said, ĎHave you ever seen it like this?í He said, ĎThe roads have never been like this.í Itís an interesting Ö


    BAQUET: What did, what did, Iím curious what Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan said when you said, ĎIím going to launch a multibillion-dollar infrastructure program.í Are they reluctant to spend that?


    TRUMP: Honestly right now Ö


    DOUTHAT: Trillion. Trillion, I think, was the figure.


    BAQUET: Because they would be in the wing of the Republican Party that would say, ĎThatís great, but youíre not going to be able to do that and balance the budget.í


    TRUMP: Letís see if I get it done. Right now theyíre in love with me. O.K.? Four weeks ago they werenít in love with me. Donít forget ó if I read The New York Times, and you donít have to put this on the record ó it can be if you want, you might not want Ö


    SULZBERGER: You say if, but you do Ö


    TRUMP: Well, I do read it. Unfortunately. I would have lived about 20 years longer if I didnít.


    SULZBERGER: Thereís Nixonís quote right there if youíd love to reread it ó


    TRUMP: I know. But when you look at the different, all the newspapers, I was going to lose the presidency, I was going to take the House with me, and the Senate had no chance. It was going to be the biggest humiliation in the history of politics in this country. And instead I won the presidency, easily, and I mean easily ó you look at those states, I had states where I won by 30 and 40 points. I won the presidency easily, I helped numerous senators ó in fact the only senators that didnít get elected were two ó one up in New Hampshire who refused to say that she was going to vote for me, who by the way would love a job in the administration and I said, ĎNo, thank you.í Thatís on the record. This is where Iím different than a politician ó I know what to say, I just believe itís sort of interesting.
    Sheíd love to have a job in the administration, I said, ĎNo, thank you.í She refused to vote for me. And a senator in Nevada who frankly said, he endorsed me then he unendorsed me, and he went down like a lead balloon. And then they called me before the race and said they wanted me to endorse him and do a big thing and I said, ĎNo thank you, good luck.í You know, letís see what happens. I said, off the record, I hope you lose. Off the record. He was! He was up by 10 points ó you know who Iím talking about.
    So, others ó if you look at Missouri, [Senator Roy] Blunt, he was down five points a few days before the election, he called for help, I gave him help, and I think I was up like over 30 points in Missouri. I was leading by a massive amount, 28 points. I gave him help and he ended up winning by four points or something. I brought a number of them. Pennsylvania, brought over the finish line. Letís see, we brought Johnson, in, you know, that was a good one. We brought him over the line in Wisconsin. Winning Wisconsin was big stuff, thatís something that Ö


    FRIEDMAN: Mr. President-elect, I came Ö


    TRUMP: So right now Iím in very good shape, but


    FRIEDMAN: I came here thinking youíd be awed and overwhelmed by this job, but I feel like you are getting very comfortable with it.


    TRUMP: I feel comfortable. I feel comfortable. I am awed by the job, as anybody would be, but I honestly, Tom, I feel so comfortable and you know it would be, to me, a great achievement if I could come back here in a year or two years and say ó and have a lot of the folks here say, ĎYouíve done a great job.í And I donít mean just a conservative job, ícause Iím not talking conservative. I mean just, weíve done a good job.


    SHEAR: To follow up on Matt, after you met with President Obama, he described you to folks as ó that you seemed overwhelmed by what he told you. So I wonder if you are overwhelmed by the magnitude of the job that youíre about to inherit and if you can tell us anything more about that conversation with the president and the apparently subsequent conversations that youíve had on the phone since then. And then maybe talk a little bit about foreign policy, thatís something we havenít touched on here, and whether or not you believe in the kind of world order ó a world order led by America in terms of having this country underwrite the security and the free markets of the world, which have been in place for decades.


    TRUMP: Sure. I had a great meeting with President Obama. I never met him before. I really liked him a lot. The meeting was supposed to be 10 minutes, 15 minutes max, because there were a lot of people waiting outside, for both of us. And it ended up being ó you were there ó I guess an hour-and-a-half meeting, close. And it was a great chemistry. I think if he said overwhelmed, I donít think he meant that in a bad way. I think he meant that it is a very overwhelming job. But Iím not overwhelmed by it. You can do things and fix it, I think he meant it that way. He said very nice things after the meeting and I said very nice things about him. I really enjoyed my meeting with him. We have ó you know, we come from different sides of the equation, but itís nevertheless something that ó I didnít know if Iíd like him. I probably thought that maybe I wouldnít, but I did, I did like him. I really enjoyed him a lot. Iíve spoken to him since the meeting.



    The motorcade of Mr. Trump after the meeting. Credit Shannon Stapleton/Reuters SHEAR: What did you say to him?


    TRUMP: Just a basic conversation.
    I think heís looking to do absolutely the right thing for the country in terms of transition and I really, Iím telling you, we had a meeting, Arthur, that went for an hour and a half that could have gone for three or four hours. It was a great ó it was just a very good meeting.


    UNKNOWN: Sort of like this meeting.

    [cross talk, laughter]


    TRUMP: He told me what he thought his, what the biggest problems of the country were, which I donít think I should reveal, I donít mind if he reveals them. But I was actually surprised a little bit. But he told me the problems, he told me things that he considered assets, but he did tell me what he thought were the biggest problems, in particular one problem that he thought was a big problem for the country, which Iíd rather have you ask him. But I really found the meeting to be very good. And I hope we can have a good ó I mean, it doesnít mean weíre going to agree on everything, but I hope that we will have a great long-term relationship. I really liked him a lot and Iím a little bit surprised Iím telling you that I really liked him a lot.

    Letís go foreign policy, sure. Sure.


    FRIEDMAN: What do you see as Americaís role in the world? Do you believe that the role Ö


    TRUMP: Thatís such a big question.


    FRIEDMAN: The role that we played for 50 years as kind of the global balancer, paying more for things because they were in our ultimate interest, one hears from you, I sense, is really shrinking that role.


    TRUMP: I donít think we should be a nation builder. I think weíve tried that. I happen to think that going into Iraq was perhaps Ö I mean you could say maybe we could have settled the civil war, O.K.? I think going into Iraq was one of the great mistakes in the history of our country. I think getting out of it ó I think we got out of it wrong, then lots of bad things happened, including the formation of ISIS. We could have gotten out of it differently.


    FRIEDMAN: NATO, Russia?


    TRUMP: I think going in was a terrible, terrible mistake. Syria, we have to solve that problem because we are going to just keep fighting, fighting forever. I have a different view on Syria than everybody else. Well, not everybody else, but then a lot of people. I had to listen to [Senator] Lindsey Graham, who, give me a break. I had to listen to Lindsey Graham talk about, you know, attacking Syria and attacking, you know, and itís like youíre now attacking Russia, youíre attacking Iran, youíre attacking. And what are we getting? Weíre getting ó and what are we getting? And I have some very definitive, I have some very strong ideas on Syria. I think whatís happened is a horrible, horrible thing. To look at the deaths, and Iím not just talking deaths on our side, which are horrible, but the deaths ó I mean you look at these cities, Arthur, where theyíre totally, theyíre rubble, massive areas, and they say two people were injured. No, thousands of people have died. O.K. And I think itís a shame. And ideally we can get ó do something with Syria. I spoke to Putin, as you know, he called me, essentially Ö


    UNKNOWN: How do you see that relationship?


    TRUMP: Essentially everybody called me, all of the major leaders, and most of them Iíve spoken to.


    FRIEDMAN: Will you have a reset with Russia?


    TRUMP: I wouldnít use that term after what happened, you know, previously. I think ó I would love to be able to get along with Russia and I think theyíd like to be able to get along with us. Itís in our mutual interest. And I donít go in with any preconceived notion, but I will tell you, I would say ó when they used to say, during the campaign, Donald Trump loves Putin, Putin loves Donald Trump, I said, huh, wouldnít it be nice, Iíd say this in front of thousands of people, wouldnít it be nice to actually report what they said, wouldnít it be nice if we actually got along with Russia, wouldnít it be nice if we went after ISIS together, which is, by the way, aside from being dangerous, itís very expensive, and ISIS shouldnít have been even allowed to form, and the people will stand up and give me a massive hand. You know they thought it was bad that I was getting along with Putin or that I believe strongly if we can get along with Russia thatís a positive thing. It is a great thing that we can get along with not only Russia but that we get along with other countries.


    JOSEPH KAHN, managing editor: On Syria, would you mind, you said you have a very strong idea about what to do with the Syria conflict, can you describe that for us?


    TRUMP: I can only say this: We have to end that craziness thatís going on in Syria. One of the things that was told to me ó can I say this off the record, or is everything on the record?


    SULZBERGER: No, if you want to Ö


    TRUMP: I donít want to violate, I donít want to violate a Ö


    SULZBERGER: If you want to go off the record, we have agreed you can go off the record. Ladies and gentlemen, we are off the record for this moment.
    [Trump speaks off the record.]


    TRUMP: Now we can go back on.


    SULZBERGER: Iím going to play the cop here. Weíve got only two and a half minutes left, because they have a hard stop at 2. And by the way, I want to thank you again, on behalf of all of us Ö


    TRUMP: Thank you.


    SULZBERGER: Ö for this meeting, and really I mean that. We are back on the record. Maggie, you get the last question.


    TRUMP: Is he a tough boss, folks? Is he tough?


    HABERMAN: I have two questions, very, very quickly. One is your vice president-elect left open the idea of returning to waterboarding. You talked about that on the campaign trail. Iím hoping you can talk about how you view torture at this point, and also what are you hoping that Jared Kushner will do in your administration and will you bring him in formally?


    TRUMP: O.K., O.K. So, I didnít hear the second question.


    HABERMAN: Jared Kushner. What will Jared Kushnerís role be in your administration?


    TRUMP: Oh. Maybe nothing. Because I donít want to have people saying Ďconflict.í Even though the president of the United States ó I hope whoever is writing this story, itís written fairly ó the president of the United States is allowed to have whatever conflicts he wants ó he or she wants. But I donít want to go by that. Jaredís a very smart guy. Heís a very good guy. The people that know him, heís a quality person and I think he can be very helpful. I would love to be able to be the one that made peace with Israel and the Palestinians. I would love that, that would be such a great achievement. Because nobodyís been able to do it.


    HABERMAN: Do you think he can be part of that?


    TRUMP: Well, I think heíd be very good at it. I mean he knows it so well. He knows the region, knows the people, knows the players. I would love to be ó and you can put that down in a list of many things that Iíd like to be able to do. Now a lot of people tell me, really great people tell me, that itís impossible, you canít do it. Iíve had a lot of, actually, great Israeli businesspeople tell me, you canít do that, itís impossible. I disagree, I think you can make peace. I think people are tired now of being shot, killed. At some point, when do they come? I think we can do that. I have reason to believe I can do that.


    HABERMAN: And on torture? Where are you ó and waterboarding?


    TRUMP: So, I met with General Mattis, who is a very respected guy. In fact, I met with a number of other generals, they say heís the finest there is. He is being seriously, seriously considered for secretary of defense, which is ó I think itís time maybe, itís time for a general. Look at whatís going on. We donít win, we canít beat anybody, we donít win anymore. At anything. We donít win on the border, we donít win with trade, we certainly donít win with the military. General Mattis is a strong, highly dignified man. I met with him at length and I asked him that question. I said, what do you think of waterboarding? He said ó I was surprised ó he said, ĎIíve never found it to be useful.í He said, ĎIíve always found, give me a pack of cigarettes and a couple of beers and I do better with that than I do with torture.í And I was very impressed by that answer. I was surprised, because heís known as being like the toughest guy. And when he said that, Iím not saying it changed my mind. [An earlier version made a mistake in transcription. Mr. Trump said ďchanged my mind,Ē not ďchanged my man.Ē] Look, we have people that are chopping off heads and drowning people in steel cages and weíre not allowed to waterboard. But Iíll tell you what, I was impressed by that answer. It certainly does not ó itís not going to make the kind of a difference that maybe a lot of people think. If itís so important to the American people, I would go for it. I would be guided by that. But General Mattis found it to be very less important, much less important than I thought he would say. I thought he would say ó you know heís known as Mad Dog Mattis, right? Mad Dog for a reason. I thought heíd say ĎItís phenomenal, donít lose it.í He actually said, ĎNo, give me some cigarettes and some drinks, and weíll do better.í


    SULZBERGER: So, I, with apologies, Iím going to go to our C.E.O., Mark Thompson, for the last, last question.


    TRUMP: Very powerful man Ö


    MARK THOMPSON: Thank you, and itís a really short one, but after all the talk about libel and libel laws, are you committed to the First Amendment to the Constitution?


    TRUMP: Oh, I was hoping he wasnít going to say that. I think youíll be happy. I think youíll be happy. Actually, somebody said to me on that, they said, ĎYou know, itís a great idea, softening up those laws, but you may get sued a lot more.í I said, ĎYou know, youíre right, I never thought about that.í I said, ĎYou know, I have to start thinking about that.í So, I, I think youíll be O.K. I think youíre going to be fine.


    SULZBERGER: Well, thank you very much for this. Really appreciate this.


    TRUMP: Thank you all, very much, itís a great honor. I will say, The Times is, itís a great, great American jewel. A world jewel. And I hope we can all get along. Weíre looking for the same thing, and I hope we can all get along well.


    MmeVertigina likes this.
    Warren Beatty: actor, director, writer, producer.

    ***** celeb

  7. #37
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,807

    Default

    Thank you for posting that transcript - I couldn't figure out how to do it. That interview is classic Trump, narcissistic and approval seeking, slimy and manipulative POS. Disgusting to see Sulzberger and Friedman and the others sucking up to him.

    I felt better when I read op-eds by Frank Bruni and especially Charles Blow a couple days later. Couldn't figure how how to link to those either.
    BITTER, nwgirl and MmeVertigina like this.
    Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum

  8. #38
    Elite Member BITTER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    GUTTED
    Posts
    25,418

    Default

    ^^^^I've come to hate the mainstream press. They're trying to jump the gun and anticipate some sort of lovefest for Trump just in case. I despise them for this. Whores, the lot of them.
    "To be [black] in this country and to be relativity conscious is to be in a rage almost all of the time." ~ James Baldwin

  9. #39
    Elite Member nwgirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    5,005

    Default

    Reading the NYT transcript, all I could think was: we're gonna make America....something, that's for sure. Based on this fucking moron's answers, it definitely won't be great. I know that much.

    'Merica!!!
    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."

  10. #40
    Elite Member MmeVertigina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Your inner ear
    Posts
    3,545

    Default

    [quote]
    RISE UP RISE UP@reifman 18m18 minutes ago
    I’ve gathered up @realDonaldTrump’s best images to help him get them off twitter #theresistance #recount2016

    0 replies1 retweet0 likes





    /quote]



  11. #41
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,144

    Default

    He is so fucking ugly, even too ugly for fugly. Disgusting. Gross.

  12. #42
    Bronze Member Jadoremusic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    47

    Default

    A nice article about the third party I don't like Clinton voters with a clip of the Chomsky interview as well.

    Noam Chomsky: People Who Didn't Vote For Clinton To Block Trump Made A 'Bad Mistake' | The Huffington Post
    panic likes this.
    Into The Wild Baby

  13. #43
    Elite Member ShimmeringGlow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    6,636

    Default




  14. #44
    Elite Member C_is_for_Cookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4,669

    Default

    I can't believe we're going from smart, articulate Obama to this childish orange turd.
    avatar made by green_queen@LJ

  15. #45
    Elite Member Brookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    In the "D"
    Posts
    24,208

    Default

    I may - or may not - have shared those photos.
    Life is short. Break the Rules. Forgive Quickly. Kiss Slowly. Love Truly.
    Laugh Uncontrollably. And never regret ANYTHING that makes you smile.

    - Mark Twain

Page 3 of 79 FirstFirst 12345671353 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Can we talk about this Trump thing?
    By MontanaMama in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 3688
    Last Post: November 23rd, 2016, 06:22 PM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: April 6th, 2010, 02:41 PM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: April 28th, 2009, 10:56 PM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: October 25th, 2005, 09:18 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •