Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456
Results 76 to 77 of 77

Thread: Dems cave utterly on healthcare: no public option is on the table, no reform, zero.

  1. #76
    Elite Member Fluffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007


    If Progressive Members of the House Think We’ll Accept Co-Ops As Public Plan, Think Again

    By: Jane Hamsher Thursday August 20, 2009 8:27 am

    Matt Taibbi says that Rahm Emanuel's health care debacle could be to the Obama administration what the Iraq war was to George Bush.

    He's right.

    Matt says that progressives in the House might not vote for a bill that does not have a public option. If that's true, it's because of external pressure, not internal resolve. They were dragged kicking and screaming to that position. They knew -- as we did -- in late June that co-ops were going to be fobbed off as a "public plan." They did not want to publicly commit to draw a line in the sand.

    June 15:
    Max Baucus announces his "co-op" plan, which was quite obviously developed to substitute for the public plan. Jerrold Nadler rightly calls it a "fake public plan."

    June 23:
    We announce our whip count effort to get members of Congress to pledge to vote against any health care bill without a strong public plan. "The American public is on our side, and they need to know that Kent Conrad's co-op plan is just kabuki."

    June 2
    4: Leaders of the Quad Caucus come together to say that they represent 117 members of the House who will vote against any health care bill that does not have a robust public option. But when readers call the offices of individual members, nobody will confirm this. We're told by Hill staffers that they believe naming no names makes this stronger, and they're angry at us for calling attention to the weakness of their strategy to hide under the umbrella of the caucus.

    July 1:
    Donna Edwards, someone that the online community raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for in her two runs for the House, who campaigned on health care reform, won't return my emails or calls for 10 days, so I write about it.

    July 9:
    Lynn Woolsey says she's got 60 votes who will vote against any bill that doesn't have a public option. I wrote that "if Lynn Woolsey's got 60 votes, I've got leprechauns in my laundry room." Having been through the supplemental battle and knowing the value of having those commitments be public, I said if she had them, she should name them.

    July 9:
    When progressive members of congress simply will not answer our questions or those of their constituents about what they'll do if there's no public plan in the final bill, we hire Mike Stark to go up on Capitol Hill and confront them with a simple question: will you or won't you commit to voting against a bill that does not have a strong public option?

    July 15:
    The Progressive Caucus "leaks" a list with the names of 50 members who will not vote for a plan that "does not meet the Progressive Caucus criteria," incluging a strong public plan.

    July 21:
    We call all 50 offices. Not one member will confirm what Diane Watson said.

    July 30:
    53 (later 57) progressive members of the House sign a letter saying that they will vote against a bill that gives in to the demands of Mike Ross and the Blue Dogs on the Energy & Commerce committee, who insist that a public plan not be tied to Medicare reimbursement rates.

    August 1:
    Mazie Hirono speaks the truth: "Ultimately, Hirono said she was a progressive who firmly believes in the public option, but that she was also someone who counted votes and that the White House would be pressuring them to make a deal."

    August 3:
    Progressives, led by Jan Schakowsky, cave to the Blue Dogs, who get what they want on Energy & Commerce. In exchange, progressives get a symbolic vote on single payer that will not pass. Pelosi laughs at the idea that in the end, they would vote against any health care bill and keep it from passing.

    August 14:
    At Netroots Nation, Donna Edwards asks me if we'll do a campaign to thank the 57 progressives who signed the letter saying they would vote down any bill that didn't have a public option tied to Medicare. I said they gave that up three days later. She assured me that it would be in the final House bill.

    August 17:
    The 57 members of Congress add 3 more to their number, and they sign a letter saying that they won't vote for any bill THROUGH CONFERENCE that doesn't have a strong public option.

    August 19:
    Blogs across the internet raise over $160,000 in 24 hours to support these 60 members of Congress.

    August 20:
    The Hill reports that there are those among the 60 signatories who would accept co-ops as a public plan, and others who don't think the commitment holds through conference. Among those who signed the letter and now won't say what they would do in conference: Donna Edwards.

    Let me ask you a question. Do you think that the people who gave money to these members of Congress for making a promise to hold the line on the public option THROUGH CONFERENCE are going to flush this one down the memory hole? That people in strong progressive districts are going to forget this commitment, and they'll just stand by while they swap out co-ops for a true public plan?

    I don't think so.

    If this pressure was exerted from within the progressive caucus, it would be one thing. But it wasn't. This was created externally, by a true grassroots movement, without the support of MoveOn, HCAN, the unions, the think tanks, or any of the other normal well-funded progressive validators living in the veal pen, who have been AWOL through the whole thing. Rahm told them to sit on the sidelines, and they have.

    Does anyone think that intensity of feeling is just going to go away? That people will simply accept Obama's "goody bag" of health care toenail clippings which delivers nothing but a political victory for him, and give up on their dreams of delivery from the current health care system? Taibbi's right -- this will be to Obama what the Iraq War was to Bush.

    But instead of repeating the mistakes of the Republicans, who allowed their representatives to line up behind George Bush and walk their party over the cliff, grass roots progressives are the ones who are taking control of the health care debate.
    They have rejected the discredited progressive leadership of the veal pen, and they are telling their progressive members of Congress that they will not accept a health care bill with a co-op "bait and switch."

    Campaign Silo » If Progressive Members of the House Think We’ll Accept Co-Ops As Public Plan, Think Again

  2. #77
    Elite Member Fluffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007

    Thumbs up

    Terry McAuliffe Will Do Fundraiser For First VA Dem to Take the Pledge

    By: Jane Hamsher Thursday August 20, 2009 2:10 pm

    Virginia blogger Ben Tribbett of NotLarrySabato reports that Terry McAuliffe believes it's time to "insist" on having a public plan in any health care bill. McAuliffe is the former head of the DNC and a fundraiser extraordinaire, so this offer should be attractive to Democratic Reps from Virginia:
    Terry's agreed to host a fundraiser with Virginia and national bloggers who are insisting on a public option for the first Virginia Congressman who will take our pledge! This will be an awesome event to highlight and honor any Virginia Congressman who shows leadership on this issue. If you would like to be a part of the host committee for this event, shoot me an email at Lowell and I are already on board, and I'm sure there will be many others!
    I asked Terry why he wanted to do this:
    Health care was a key issue on which we all campaigned so hard for in 2008, and I'm happy to see that progressive bloggers are working to ensure we take advantage of this historic opportunity to get the reform we need. Now is the time to act. Our elected officials in Congress should insist on including a public option.
    We've now raised over $240,000 for the 65 members of Congress who have already pledged to vote against any health care bill that does not have a strong public plan. The New York Times has an article up about it, and hekebolos on Daily Kos has more.

    As Ben says:
    Will the fundraiser be for Bobby Scott, Jim Moran, Gerry Connolly, Tom Perriello? Any of them can get a night with national and local bloggers honoring them featuring T-Mac... but first they have to do the right thing.
    The public plan whip's not just for bloggers any more.

    Note: If anyone would like to match Terry and make the same offer to try and grow the ranks of the 65 -- celebs, bands, political figures, people with lots of rich friends -- drop me a line. jh

    Campaign Silo » Terry McAuliffe Will Do Fundraiser For First VA Dem to Take the Pledge

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. White House may cave on health care public option
    By Fluffy in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: July 7th, 2009, 11:36 AM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: July 5th, 2009, 10:20 AM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: April 25th, 2009, 11:20 PM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: April 21st, 2009, 01:25 PM
  5. Democrats cave utterly to Bush over Iraq..and he still says NO.
    By Grimmlok in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: May 19th, 2007, 01:44 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts