Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Sarah Palin, Greta Van Susteren & Scientology Part II: Susteren doth protest too much

  1. #1
    Elite Member WhoAmI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    4,371

    Default Sarah Palin, Greta Van Susteren & Scientology Part II: Susteren doth protest too much

    HuffPo's Rachel Weiner has already reported on Greta Van Susteren's defensive response to a Politico story today, which cited an anonymous source saying that one of the reasons that Sarah Palin has been caught up in a "series of public relations gaffes" is because she is "taking advice from Greta and her husband."

    In her Fox News blog, Van Susteren vehemently denied offering Palin any advice, and called the authors to task for not checking on this allegation. Let me give Van Susteren her due. This is a serious charge of direct professional misconduct, and there should have been more than a throwaway line from an unnamed source to back it up. The allegation begs further questioning.

    But what Van Susteren does acknowledge in her "brief" on the subject is equally troubling:

    1. She acknowledges that her husband, John Coale, has been advising Palin, that they are in weekly contact, and that he played a central role in the formation of her national political action committee, SarahPAC--all while she has been covering Palin for Fox News.

    2. She acknowledges that her husband met Palin through Van Susteren's media contacts with the governor. In short, he used his wife's journalistic access to Palin to gain his own political access.

    There are some serious journalistic conflicts of interest taking place here, and Van Susteren is either being duplicitous or disingenuous to characterize them as "silly."



    I've written earlier in HuffPo about the odd dynamic that has developed over the past seven months between the Palins, Van Susteren, and her power broker husband, Coale. Both Coale and Van Susteren are prominent practitioners in the controversial Church of Scientology, and Coale has been a major behind-the-scenes political force in Washington, D.C., for decades.

    Since my first story appeared, several people have contacted me with more troubling information on the subject.

    Coale's extensive training in Scientology is a matter of public record. He has completed the organization's course OT-VII, Scientology's second most powerful level.

    Moreover, Coale has been a major player in national political circles for nearly a quarter century. The Gawker recently obtained a chilling and revelatory document--"How Scientologists Can Take Responsibility for and BE AT CAUSE OVER the Fourth Dynamic"-- signed by Coale, which not only in riddled with Scientology jargon, but also provides troubling insight into his overall political strategy. Coale's proposed FLAGG PAC (which stood for "Freedom, Liberty, and Good Government Political Action Committee") never got off the ground, but in essence, Coale himself has become a one-man PAC himself, pursuing the the political goals of his memo single-handedly, with Van Susteren as his well-placed tag-team partner.



    Coale's extensive contributions to elected officials--including a $2,000 contribution to then U.S. Senate candidate Barrack Obama in 2004--can be viewed at the Federal Election Commission's web site. He gave more than $20,000 in so-called "soft money" and tens of thousands to targeted candidates, most of them Democrats and many of them women. Here's a sampling:

    COALE, JOHN P. MR.,CLEARWATER, FL 33755

    REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE--12/31/2008, $26,200.00 29932105390

    Earlier this decade, Coale and Van Susteren also participated in a bizarre Ponzi scheme, according to the Los Angeles Times, in which they were forced to pay back $700,000 of the $939,000 they netted in the crooked deal, which apparently had links to Scientology.

    Some Palin supporters took me to task for not going into the Van Susteren-Clinton connection more closely. Indeed, Coale was a major contributor to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, and then abruptly switched sides when Hillary was denied the nomination. There is an interesting notation in the FEC documents of a "negative" contribution, or withdrawal, from Clinton's campaign on August 28, 2008--the same date that Obama made his historic acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention. The following day, Palin was named as John McCain's running mate.

    From that point on, Coale dumped nearly $60,000 into the McCain-Palin campaign and the Republican National Committee, including a last-hour donation on New Year's Eve of $26,200 to the RNC. In respect to Hillary Clinton, not only did he contribute thousands of dollars to her ill-fated presidential run, he also contributed thousands to her 2000 race for the U.S. Senate.

    Moreover, several people have suggested that the Scientology-Bill Clinton connection went so far as to impact U.S. Foreign policy vis a vis Germany, a country that has condemned Scientology. In a fascinating and thoroughly researched article entitled "Hollywood's Celebrity-Lobbyists and the Clinton Administration's American Foreign Policy Toward German Scientology," Dr. Stephen Kent of the University of Alberta goes into painstaking detail about the inner workings of this relationship.

    Abstract: This article takes basic insights provided by resource mobilization theory in order to discuss how Scientology celebrities used their status to influence the international debate over Scientology between the United States and Germany. Their ability to have done so is another indicator of the access to American political elites that Hollywood cultural elites have gained in recent years, most especially during the administration of President Bill Clinton (1992-2000).

    (Some people have gone so far as to suggest that Clinton actually went to bat for Scientology in Germany in exchange for John Travolta softening his portrayal of the Clinton character in Primary Colors.)

    What is obvious is that Van Susteren has had unique access to the Clintons, has conducted several soft-ball interviews with them a la Palin over the years, most recently as last week with Hillary, during which time they actually joked about Van Susteren's performance at a North Korean karaoke bar. Was it simply a coincidence that Van Susteren headed to Mexico to do a piece on the Drug Wars there at precisely the same time that Hillary went there to assess the situation? Come now. The fix is in.



    Given her husband's close political relationship with the Clintons, one has to ask why Van Susteren is still allowed to conduct political interviews with them at Fox News? This is a clear-cut case of journalistic conflict-of-interest. Period. End of discussion.

    Ditto for Van Susteren and the Palins. If Van Susteren's husband is directly advising Palin on what is clearly shaping up to be a national bid for the Presidency--as Van Susteren herself acknowledges--then Van Susteren has some serious conflicts of interest going on here as well. When are the Fox News execs going to call Van Susteren on this clear-cut breach? The Bard was right: Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.
    Geoffrey Dunn: Sarah, Greta & Scientology--Part II: Van Susteren Doth Protest Too Much

  2. #2
    A*O
    A*O is offline
    Friend of Gossip Rocks! A*O's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Being Paula
    Posts
    31,675

    Default

    Ohhh good-o, Palin is being groomed to be a Co$bot too. She's certainly dumb enough.
    If all the women in this place were laid end to end, I wouldn’t be surprised - Dorothy Parker

  3. #3
    Elite Member L1049's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Chillin with my homeboy Xenu
    Posts
    2,435

    Default

    2009 is really looking up for the Co$

    I don't have anymore to add except these threads from whyweprotest. They go into a bit more detail regarding Coale/Palin PAC:
    Scieno Coale on Palin PAC (2012 election) - Why We Protest | Activism Forum

    Gawker obtains Coale dox - Why We Protest | Activism Forum

    This story also made 'The Economist':
    Scientologists for Palin | Democracy in America | Economist.com

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Greta Van Susteren rips Politico for alleging she advises Sarah Palin
    By WhoAmI in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 30th, 2009, 12:08 AM
  2. Greta Van Susteren, Scientology and SarahPac (Sarah Palin)
    By Fluffy in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: February 20th, 2009, 10:27 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: November 3rd, 2008, 04:25 PM
  4. Replies: 12
    Last Post: February 13th, 2008, 03:45 PM
  5. Replies: 20
    Last Post: June 13th, 2007, 09:28 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •