Login to remove the ads!
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: GOP tards: 1.3 trillion Bush tax cuts = good, 900 billion to save US economy = bad

  1. #1
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
    Posts
    55,372

    Angry GOP tards: 1.3 trillion Bush tax cuts = good, 900 billion to save US economy = bad

    As the senate version of the economic recovery package makes its way through Congress, a significant (though misguided) criticism of the package from Senate Republicans is that it is “too big.” For example, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) claimed, “from the very first moment of this debate, there’s been strong bipartisan agreement on one thing: the original version of this bill was too big.”

    Similarly, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) lamented, “[T]his bill spends far too much,” while Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) said, “It’s very wasteful…if you throw in the interest it’s about $1.3 trillion.” Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) called passing such a large package this week “just unthinkable.” Watch a compilation of these and other complaints about the size of the package:

    Such objections are indeed ironic coming from some of the greatest advocates for President Bush’s $1.35 trillion tax cut package in 2001. Indeed, when Bush introduced his tax cuts he declared, “A warning light is flashing on the dashboard of our economy, and we just can’t drive on and hope for the best. We need tax relief now.” The Republicans who now call the $800 billion recovery package “too big” jumped on the Bush bandwagon claiming his $1.35 trillion in tax cuts were just what was needed to jump start a sluggish economy:

    Kyl: [I]“I was there when the president signed into law the tax cut. … f that isn’t one of the best things we can do to get this economy going again, then it seems to me that the American people might well lose confidence in what we’re doing, which would be the worst thing to do for the economy.” [Finance Committee Hearing, 10/3/2001]

    Ensign: “Well, I don’t know that we’re going to get to the — you know, the total $1.3 trillion tax cut. I do think the tax cuts are necessary right now.” [CNN, 1/3/2001]

    Graham thought the cuts were so effective he wanted to make them permanent. But the tax cuts they championed proved to be extremely ineffective, leading to the slowest period of economic growth in decades.

    If you compare the condition of the economy in 2001 to the current state of the economy, the numbers show that those who now call the recovery package too big, were willing to spend far more when the economic situation wasn’t nearly as precarious:


    2001 - Cost of tax cuts package: $1.35 trillion

    2009 - cost of stimulus bill :$900 billion

    2001 - Unemployment: 4%

    2009 - Unemployment: 7.6%

    2001 - Percent of Population Living In Poverty: 12.7%

    2009 - Percent of Population Living In Poverty:17%

    2001 - Foreclosure Rates: .48%

    2009 - Foreclosure Rates:1.19%

    2001 - Americans Relying On Food Stamps: 17 million

    2009 - Americans Relying On Food Stamps: Over 30 million

    thinkprogress.com
    Retards.
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  2. #2
    Elite Member kingcap72's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    10 miles from Pootie Tang
    Posts
    21,910

    Default

    That's why all of the Republican bitching about spending is bullshit. They don't mind spending taxpayer cash, including over a trillion dollars to illegally invade Iraq to make their corporate friends rich, but let the Dems try to spend money and they flip out.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Want to save the economy? Read Alexander Hamilton
    By buttmunch in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 14th, 2008, 04:35 AM
  2. Concerns over US Economy put Bush at 19% approval
    By Mr. Authority in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: February 21st, 2008, 02:04 PM
  3. No this isn't deja vu: Bush wants $46 Billion more for wars!!!!
    By AliceInWonderland in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: October 24th, 2007, 01:47 AM
  4. Bush seeks nearly $50 billion more for wars
    By AliceInWonderland in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: September 29th, 2007, 04:45 AM
  5. The Bush Economy: Fat, Drunk & Broke
    By ourmaninBusan in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: May 13th, 2006, 02:23 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •