Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: The Reregulation Mantra

  1. #1
    Elite Member JamieElizabeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    San Jose, California, United States

    Default The Reregulation Mantra

    Opinion Editorial by John Stossel - Nov 28, 2008

    In response to the economic crisis, many politicians say the problem has been "too much deregulation." But when did this vaunted "deregulation" ever take place? Are more regulations likely to help?
    “It’s deregulation’s fault!”

    That’s the conventional explanation for the economic mess.
    Barack Obama said, “This is a final verdict on the failed economic policies of the last eight years ... that essentially said that we should strip away regulations, consumer protections, let the market run wild, and prosperity would rain down on all of us.”

    Is deregulation is the culprit? It can’t be. There was no relevant deregulation in the last 25 years. Meanwhile, highly regulated institutions eagerly bought risky government-guaranteed mortgages, stimulating excessive housing construction and an unsustainable price bubble.

    Deregulation wasn’t the problem, and reregulation isn’t the solution.
    It’s intuitive to assume that regulation prevents problems, but it’s rarely true. First, how would regulators know what to do? Leaving aside the bias they might have and the brutal fact that regulation is physical force, how can a small group of people understand the workings of a market sufficiently to regulate sensibly?

    Markets, especially financial markets, are far more complicated than any mind can grasp. They consist of many millions of participants making countless decisions on the basis of unarticulated know-how and intuition. To attempt to regulate such activity requires knowledge no one can possess.

    To seriously regulate those markets you’d have to impose the “precautionary principle,” a favorite idea of some environmentalists, especially in Europe. The principle prohibits any product or activity not proven 100 percent safe.

    It sounds so reasonable. But Ron Bailey of Reason points out what it really means: Don’t do anything for the first time.
    Bad idea. The world needs innovators and inventors. We need people who try things for the first time.

    Nobel Laureate F.A. Hayek emphasized that government planners suffer from a “knowledge problem” because “the knowledge of the circumstances of which [they] must make use never exists in concentrated or integrated form but solely as the dispersed bits of incomplete and frequently contradictory knowledge which all the separate individuals possess.”
    In other words, the planner or regulator can’t possibly know what the multitude in a market “knows.” So what regulators really do is straitjacket market participants, preventing innovators from creating prosperity for us all.

    Another “Austrian school” economist, Israel Kirzner, applied Hayek’s insights to typical regulation, showing how it must interfere with the market’s discovery process, the profit-and-loss system that uncovers information vital to making consumers better off:
    “Even if current market outcomes in some sense are judged unsatisfactory, intervention ... cannot be considered the obviously correct solution. Deliberate intervention by the state not only might serve as an imperfect substitute for the spontaneous market process of discovery; but also might impede desirable processes of discovery, the need for which has not been perceived by the government.”

    Kirzner’s point is that even if our problems are the result of market failures — and with so much intervention, how could they be? — there is no reason to believe that government could do a better job. Quite the contrary.

    The relevance of his ideas to what ails the economy now should be clear. The current interventions prevent market participants from adjusting to new conditions.

    Banks might be willing to sell their shaky loans to investors at a steep discount, but why do that if the government might bail them out? Why not wait to see if you can get a better price?

    With the politicians constantly changing the details of the bailout, selling at a discount today might get you accused of fiduciary malpractice later.

    Uncertainty over what further new regulations may be imposed only stifles the market’s search for solutions.

    Markets are never perfect. They are made up of people making their best judgments, and people’s judgments are never perfect. Yes, under some circumstances market activity such as speculation and short-selling could harm innocent bystanders. But those who say government is the best protector are wrong because the knowledge problem is an insurmountable obstacle.

    There is only one genuine protection for the public: the discipline of profit and loss. Nothing concentrates the mind like the prospect of bankruptcy.

  2. #2
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM


    why must you post drivel from this person
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  3. #3
    Elite Member Fluffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007


    It amazes me that people still call John Stossel a journalist.

  4. #4
    Elite Member MohandasKGanja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Wherever my kids are


    This article is so idiotic that it makes my head spin. EVERYTHING is regulated to some extent. And a certain amount of minimal regulation is needed in all capitalist markets to prevent utter chaos.

    The markets where some of the biggest problems were, truthfully, not de-regulated. However, they had never been regulated in the first place. And they should have been. I wish I could remember the Government official who wanted to regulate a key financial trading area that was completely unscrutinized (I think this was during the Clinton Administration). She was shot down by Robert Rubin and at least one other official.

    So, Stossel, as usual, is completely clouding the issue. However, he gets paid handsomely to deliver this spield to interest groups all over the United States.

  5. #5
    Elite Member msdeb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    in a van down by the river


    John Stossel is soooooo 1990's
    Basic rule of Gossip Rocks: Don't be a dick.Tati
    Lighten Up Francis WCG

  6. #6
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    May 2008


    You lost me with Stosel.

  7. #7
    Gold Member ymeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008


    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmlok View Post
    why must you post drivel from this person

    Ha! I actually read the blasted article before I noticed who wrote it, people post really good stuff here 99% of the time.

    When I think of him I always remember this special video moment:
    YouTube - WRESTLING IS FAKE (watch before commenting)

    and he's completely full of it. This (deregulation of everything) b.s. started with Reagan, it was doomed to fail, it doesn't work, and everyone knows it now but these professional kool-aid pimps whom I seriously hope will soon be out of work.

  8. #8
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008

    Default Re

    He is awful. I first "noticed" him 10-15 years ago on 20/20 or one of those other douche-y shows. His schtick is to take a controversial or contrarian premise and then attempt to herd the "facts" or "evidence" into that premise while disregarding anything that does not support his premise. He violates nearly every principle of logic and reasoning in the process.

    I can't believe he's still "reporting" or "commenting" or whatever it is he does.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts