Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Oil depletion: Barack Obama faces hard political decisions

  1. #1
    Elite Member Fluffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    5,600

    Default Oil depletion: Barack Obama faces hard political decisions

    Oil Depletion: Obama Faces Hard Political Decisions

    10 Nov 2008

    Washington insiders are well aware of oil depletion. It has been the subject of at least four reports funded by the United States Government, more than a dozen books, and multiple independent reports. Congress has taken testimony. Key figures in Washington have made speeches. Although there are some differences in the details, they are trivial in comparison with the broader perspective.
    It is highly probable that oil demand will exceed oil supply within the next 8 years.
    If you buy heating oil, propane, gasoline, or diesel fuel, you have already become a victim of oil depletion. Fuel prices are up. And they are up because the supply of oil failed to keep up with the growing demand for oil. That led to greed driven speculation. Oil prices over $140 a barrel. Then speculators discovered recessionary forces were driving down the demand for oil. Fear immediately replaced greed. The price of oil declined. Fast.

    But do not be fooled by this temporary decline in the price you pay for fuels. OPEC will curtail production until demand picks up again. The fundamental trends have not changed. The supply of oil will not keep up with the demand for oil. Higher prices and shortages are in your future.
    The Washington establishment’s failure to acknowledge oil depletion is not one of ignorance. It has been a matter of political expediency. Politicians prefer to avoid bad news. Depletion means higher prices and possible shortages. Depletion adds confusion to the problems of global warming. Depletion lends support to America’s presence in Iraq. Acknowledging oil depletion creates additional stress for our political system.

    Yes. Oil depletion creates a real political dilemma for Barack Obama. If he acknowledges oil depletion – Peak Oil – then he will be expected to do something about it. Barack will have to challenge embedded political philosophy. He will have to find a way to change public opinion without causing a political crisis for the Democrats.

    It will not be easy. Acknowledging oil depletion means finding more oil resources to keep our economy going. Shortages must be avoided. Put a lid on prices. Drill everywhere. No sacred environmental cows such as ANWR or the Santa Barbra channel. Make deals for oil with whomever is in charge of the big oil nations. Control the political outcome in the Middle East. Stay in Iraq to protect America’s interests. Tough choices. High political risk.

    But if Barack ignores oil depletion, then what? He runs the risk of cataclysmic failure. Because it is highly likely that sometime – during his administration - shortages and high prices will decimate America’s economy. That means high unemployment. Out of control inflation. Voters will be mad as hell. Why – they will ask – did you let this happen to us?

    Would Barack be less popular than George Bush? Doing nothing also means political risk.

    So. What to do? Barack faces hard political decisions. Oil depletion will force his hand. One way – or the other. In the spirit of being constructive, here are four suggestions:
    1. Take an integrated approach to contemporary concerns about global warming and fossil fuel depletion. Global warming and fossil fuel depletion are in fact evil twins, and if we want to make intelligent choices, we need to deal with them as a package.
    2. Persuade national leaders to form an oil and natural gas consumer’s union. Start with the United States, Canada, and the European Union. Invite China and India. This will give consuming nations the leverage needed to deal with supplier cartels, and – hopefully – lead to resource sharing agreements.
    3. Find a way to deal with the Middle East. These nations have most of the world’s remaining deposits of cheap oil. For the sake of world peace, we must control the outcome.
    4. Create a credible energy program. One with strong management, specific objectives, adequate funding, and a time line for accomplishment. Include public policy initiatives that promote conservation and the evolution of energy conscious life styles.
    There is a very long list of potential initiatives Barack could implement. Sorting through them will test his wisdom and political courage. But try he must. Oil depletion is a challenge that will not go away.

    Ronald R. Cooke
    The Cultural Economist
    Author: Oil, Jihad and Destiny

    For more on oil depletion and what we can do to help our nation, check out the essays under the Energy Tab, and read “The Report on Oil Depletion” at www.tce.name

    Ron Cooke: Oil Depletion: Obama Faces Hard Political Decisions | Global Public Media

  2. #2
    Elite Member lurkur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    5,382

    Default

    Faulty logic. Admitting we're running out of oil doesn't necessarily mean you NEED more drilling, it means you need another energy source.

    The piece doesn't say much about environment, just wraps global warming with oil supply and demand. It tries to paint us in a corner that we need to drill more and "deal with" the Middle East, but those aren't the only options.

  3. #3
    Elite Member Fluffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    5,600

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lurkur View Post
    Faulty logic. Admitting we're running out of oil doesn't necessarily mean you NEED more drilling, it means you need another energy source.
    Not necessarily. After the US peaked oil production in the early 70s, increased drilling was what kept US production afloat. If drilling hadn't increased, then US production would have sunk to lower levels.

    Quote Originally Posted by lurkur View Post
    The piece doesn't say much about environment, just wraps global warming with oil supply and demand. It tries to paint us in a corner that we need to drill more and "deal with" the Middle East, but those aren't the only options.
    The environment isn't the focus of the article. With decreasing oil supply many countries such as China will use more coal, which is much dirtier, pollution-wise, than oil.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Barack Obama faces tests in Japan and Korea
    By bychance in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: November 5th, 2008, 09:23 PM
  2. Early transition decisions to shape Barack Obama presidency
    By Belinda in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: November 5th, 2008, 08:43 AM
  3. Barack Obama faces big challenges for his big speech
    By kingcap72 in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: August 30th, 2008, 11:27 AM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: June 5th, 2008, 12:34 PM
  5. Barack Obama criticizes John McCain on Senate floor, McCain hits back hard
    By witchcurlgirl in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: May 26th, 2008, 09:32 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •