Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Fox News' faux documentary on Barack Obama sets new low

  1. #1
    Elite Member celeb_2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    13,468

    Thumbs down Fox News' faux documentary on Barack Obama sets new low

    Fox News' faux documentary sets new low - Los Angeles Times

    Sean Hannity's Sunday report, 'Obama and Friends: The History of Radicalism,' relied on innuendo and guilt by association to label the Illinois senator a dupe of the shadowy forces of the left.

    Now and then, Fox News makes a stab at living up to its "fair and balanced" tag line.

    At other times, the cable network's operatives throw off all pretense, let their neatly trimmed hair down and do what they seem to love best -- blame all of the world's evils on those pointy-headed, America-hating liberals. Like, say, Barack Obama!

    Fox host Sean Hannity and his producers served up a heaping portion of just such red meat Sunday night on "Hannity's America." And they've since been making lame defenses of the faux documentary, which bore the subtle title: "Obama and Friends: The History of Radicalism."

    Fox's hourlong screed is just the kind of media coverage that has contributed to the increasingly angry and irrational tone on the campaign trail. Even by the low standards of this election's advocacy journalism, the program plumbed new depths -- relying on innuendo and guilt by association to paint the Illinois senator as a dupe of the shadowy forces of the left.

    Much of Hannity's report was based on interviews with half a dozen partisan commentators, whose main qualification seems to have been a previously expressed disdain for Obama.

    Near the top of the program, the host introduced one of them, Andy Martin, as an "author and journalist." But reporters in his Chicago hometown know Martin better as a perennial political candidate and serial litigant.

    The Chicago Tribune has spent some time examining Martin's past. He was refused entry to the Illinois bar in the 1970s, in part because his Selective Service records showed his thoughts exhibited "a paranoid flavor and a grandiose character."

    In a 1983 personal bankruptcy case, he referred to a judge as a "crooked, slimy Jew." And a federal judge noted his history of "vexatious, frivolous and scandalous" lawsuits.

    When he ran for Illinois governor two years ago, Martin quoted a nearly 30-year-old Tribune editorial that called him "an absolutely brilliant campaigner" when he was running for a Senate seat. He didn't mention that the same editorial said he "has no more business in the U.S. Senate than an elk has in a phone booth."

    The producer of the Hannity program declined to be interviewed, so it's impossible to determine whether Fox didn't know about Martin's history or just didn't care.

    Perhaps the producers relied on the gadfly's own website, which assures us he is "a legendary Chicago muckraker, author, Internet columnist, radio talk-show host, broadcaster and media critic." And expert in all things Barack Obama.

    So when Hannity wanted to know what Obama did as a young community organizer, Martin was ready with a pithy answer: "I think a community organizer, in Barack Obama's case, was somebody that was in training for a radical overthrow of the government."

    Martin offered no evidence. None. But, when I called him, he helped me understand why this was not a problem.

    "I do involve with the facts," he began, "but when the facts aren't all there, and the perpetrator has concealed all the facts and is basically refusing to testify, you are allowed to draw an adverse inference."

    It sounds to me as if he's saying: When you can't prove something, you're allowed to make stuff up. And does that also mean you might as well assume the worst? I asked.

    "The proof of the pudding," Martin responded, "is that they are on the verge of taking over the government."

    So, if Obama is elected, that would constitute a "radical overthrow"?

    Well, Martin conceded, "maybe I should have changed my words around to say there would be a change of the government that would put a radical in charge."

    During the program, Martin floated other wild theories, including one based on Obama's association with 1960s radical William Ayres.

    He noted that Ayres had spoken fondly of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who, in turn, "learned from Fidel Castro of the Cuban revolution."

    That led Martin to share this conclusion with Fox viewers: "If you love the Cuban revolution and Castro, and if you love what's happening in Venezuela with Hugo Chavez, you'll love Barry Obama -- Barack Obama, as he calls himself -- in the White House."

    Helpful. Now I'm starting to get it. Take opinions and present them as facts. Stitch them into patterns. Then pretend to your viewers -- as many as 2 million typically watch Hannity's Sunday show -- that those patterns reveal the truth.

    But that was merely mortar for the program's building blocks: Obama's relationships. And if Obama knew them -- Ayres, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., Palestinian scholar Rashid Khalidi -- it's pretty obvious (darn right!) he must subscribe to their most controversial ideas.

    I take Hannity at his word -- when confronted on-air this week by Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs over Martin's past comments -- that he and his Fox colleagues do not condone anti-Semitism. Martin has denied he ever made anti-Semitic remarks.

    The Fox host seemed to excuse the lack of balance by arguing that he had interviewed liberals, such as Malik Shabazz and Al Sharpton, on other programs.

    How that even remotely exonerates the Obama program, which made no pretense of presenting even a single defense of the Democrat, is beyond me.

    Of course, there was no time in the Hannity hour to, for instance, interview the conservatives who helped elect Obama president of the Harvard Law Review.

    Hannity was too busy probing deep into Obamaworld's shadowy corridors, like the one that leads to Saul Alinsky, the founder of community organizing.

    No one denies that the young Obama, like thousands of others before and since, was inspired by Alinsky, who preached that society's have-nots should expand their power by working aggressively within the government.

    As a young reporter here in Los Angeles, I learned firsthand the impact of such teachings, when Alinsky-inspired community organizations first shook the halls of power.

    What did they do? They lowered auto insurance premiums on the Eastside. They drove liquor stores out of South Central. They organized an anti-gang program.

    Hannity and his confederates ought to take a close look at that last one. It had the backing of another wild-eyed fanatic -- Richard Riordan, the city's Republican mayor.

  2. #2
    Elite Member L1049's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Chillin with my homeboy Xenu
    Posts
    2,435

    Default

    .....and you expected anything less from fox?
    I wonder if our favourite mini-pastry is going to praise this.

  3. #3
    Elite Member *DIVA!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    15,742

    Default

    I think this was the 'pudding' that filled the mini-pastry??
    Baltimore O's ​Fan!

    I don''t know if she really fucked the board though. Maybe just put the tip in. -Mrs. Dark

  4. #4
    Elite Member bychance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    5,294

    Default

    How can anyone actually say with a straight face that FOX is fair and balanced?

  5. #5
    Elite Member MontanaMama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Evading P6 & P7
    Posts
    13,466

    Default

    Robert Gibbs was BRILLIANT after the debate when talking to Hannity. He absolutely owned Hannity. And YES, I believe this was the "truth" that was "revealed" to us all last weekend. I'm seeing a pattern of what constitutes the logic of truth on the far right.

  6. #6
    Elite Member KrisNine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sleepy night night land
    Posts
    22,889

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SSDiva View Post
    I think this was the 'pudding' that filled the mini-pastry??
    Me thinks you're on to something

  7. #7
    Friend of Gossip Rocks! buttmunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Uranus
    Posts
    31,885

    Default

    Faux News is desperate because they've been backing the repugs for so long that there is no way back. Their viewership consists of people who think exactly like them and want to hear anything that supports their warped sense of the world. I love watching, though. It's a laugh a minute.
    'Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither.' Ben Franklin

    "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross."
    --Sinclair Lewis

  8. #8
    Elite Member bychance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    5,294

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MontanaMama View Post
    Robert Gibbs was BRILLIANT after the debate when talking to Hannity. He absolutely owned Hannity. And YES, I believe this was the "truth" that was "revealed" to us all last weekend. I'm seeing a pattern of what constitutes the logic of truth on the far right.
    oOOH VIDEO PLZ!!

  9. #9
    Super Moderator twitchy2.0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Milliways
    Posts
    55,115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SSDiva View Post
    I think this was the 'pudding' that filled the mini-pastry??
    Yes, and I couldn't help but notice there's still no proof in this pudding.
    "If you are not outraged, then you are not paying attention," Heather Heyer's facebook quote.

  10. #10
    Elite Member kingcap72's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    10 miles from Pootie Tang
    Posts
    21,909

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bychance View Post
    How can anyone actually say with a straight face that FOX is fair and balanced?
    Inbreeding has a lot to do with it.

  11. #11
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    6,038

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by twitchy2.0 View Post
    Yes, and I couldn't help but notice there's still no proof in this pudding.
    ...and I've also noticed a distinct slow down in McCain's defenders in recent days

  12. #12
    Elite Member *DIVA!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    15,742

    Default

    ^^I've noticed that also, maybe they will come back when McCain whips Obama's ass Wednesday...
    Baltimore O's ​Fan!

    I don''t know if she really fucked the board though. Maybe just put the tip in. -Mrs. Dark

  13. #13
    Elite Member WesCAdle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Chokey Chicken on the Left Coast
    Posts
    1,518

    Default

    I was surprised in the McBlame program that they even mentioned Cindyland's perc and vicodin habit where of course she did the RIGHT thing and went to Rehab - they also really skimmed over how McBlame was cheating on his wife and family with her before he divorced his first wife and married her. Also they forgot to mention all the Repugs who say he's a hothead that gets going on something and will not let it drop calling people abusive names and playing nasty political tricks on them. Hmmm!
    as privileged as a whore...victims in demand for public show, swept out through the cracks beneath the door, holier than thou, how?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: October 5th, 2008, 10:15 PM
  2. Hype: The Barack Obama Effect documentary
    By Incognito in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: August 26th, 2008, 12:41 PM
  3. Barack Obama blames Fox News for his likely Kentucky loss
    By witchcurlgirl in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: May 21st, 2008, 09:00 AM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: November 14th, 2007, 08:11 PM
  5. Barack Obama bitchslaps FOX news
    By Grimmlok in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: January 25th, 2007, 05:01 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •