Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: How Alaska's AG defied the publicís interest to cover for Sarah Palin in Troopergate

  1. #1
    Elite Member Fluffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007

    Exclamation How Alaska's AG defied the publicís interest to cover for Sarah Palin in Troopergate

    Currently, there are rumors that the Alaska Attorney General (AG) will resign after having to take orders from the McCain campaign.

    How Alaska's AG defied the public’s interest to cover for Palin in Troopergate

    By Donald Craig Mitchell

    For Alaskans who have been enjoying the blood sport that Sarah Palin’s weaving and bobbing to avoid accountability in the Troopergate investigation has generated, last week there were two noteworthy new developments.

    As America now knows, Troopergate is the local Alaska name for the investigation that the Alaska Legislature (by a unanimous vote of both Republicans and Democrats) directed the Judiciary Committee of the Alaska Senate to initiate to find out whether Sarah and the Palinistas who work for her in the Governor’s Office tried (unsuccessfully as it turned out) to pressure Walt Monegan, the Commissioner of the Alaska Department of Public Safety, to violate civil service laws and the State’s contract with the State Troopers’ union by firing Trooper Mike Wooten, Sarah’s ex-brother-in-law. Alaska Governor Palin welcomed the Troopergate investigation.

    Republican Vice Presidential Candidate Palin now wants nothing to do with it.

    Alaska AG Talis Colberg

    To try to weasel out of cooperating, Republican Vice Presidential Candidate Palin instructed Talis Colberg, Alaska Governor Palin's attorney general, to have the Alaska Department of Law hire a journeyman Anchorage attorney named Tom Van Flein to try to discredit the Troopergate investigation. For the past two weeks Van Flein’s legal strategy - if you can call it a legal strategy - has been two-pronged. The first prong has been to try to publicly trash the professional reputations of Hollis French, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Steve Branchflower, the attorney the Committee hired to interview witnesses, gather documents, and then piece together the Troopergate story. The second prong has been to try to impede the investigation by encouraging the witnesses Branchflower needs to interview to refuse to cooperate.Unfortunately for Van Flein, inside the Alaska Legislature, Hollis French, who is a thoroughly decent guy and was a prosecutor himself before he was elected to the Alaska Senate, is liked and respected. Steve Branchflower, a veteran of the Anchorage District Attorney’s Office is a seasoned and perseverant former prosecutor. And, most importantly, despite the arm-twisting (or worse) to which he has been subjected by the McCain presidential campaign, Charlie Huggins, a conservative Republican who represents Wasilla, Sarah Palin’s hometown, in the Alaska Senate, and who is the swing vote on the Senate Judiciary Committee, has continued to stand with Hollis. As a consequence, rather than shutting down the Troopergate investigation, Van Flein’s absolutely shameful performance has accelerated it.

    Which brings me to the first new development: the decision by the McCain presidential campaign to fly a New York City attorney named Edward O’Callaghan into Anchorage to elbow Tom Van Flein aside and assume command of Sarah Palin’s effort to run out the clock on the Troopergate investigation until after the November election.

    The website of the New York State Bar Association lists O’Callaghan as an employee of the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. But the end of July he resigned and moved to the McCain presidential campaign. When O’Callaghan appeared last week at an Anchorage news conference Michael Isikoff of Newsweek Magazine reported: “O’Callaghan told Newsweek that he and another McCain campaign lawyer (whom he declined to identify) are serving as legal ‘consultants’ to Thomas Van Flein, the Anchorage lawyer who at state expense is representing Palin and her office in the [Troopergate] inquiry. ‘We are advising Thomas Van Flein on this matter to the extent that it impacts on the national campaign,’ O’Callaghan said. ‘I’m helping out on legal strategy.’”

    I am impressed by that candor. But, for O’Callaghan, describing so brazenly what John McCain sent him to Anchorage to do here creates a not so minor problem because Edward O’Callaghan is not a member of the Alaska Bar. I just checked. I am. He’s not.

    The pickle O’Callaghan’s wagging tongue has gotten its owner into is that, pursuant to Alaska Statute 8.08.230, a person who is not a member of the Alaska Bar who while physically present in Alaska “engages in the practice of law” is guilty of a class A misdemeanor. And in Alaska the “practice of law” includes “rendering legal consultation or advice”.

    So Edward O’Callaghan is a self-confessed miscreant. It would be interesting to know what John McCain thinks about having a criminal serving on his legal team. It also would be interesting to know whether Talis Colberg, Sarah Palin’s attorney general, intends to prosecute O’Callaghan. And if he doesn’t, why not?

    Which brings me to the second new development: Talis Colberg.

    Alaska is one of only five states in which the governor appoints the attorney general. In almost all of the other states the attorney general is elected the way Jerry Brown and Andrew Cuomo were elected in California and New York.

    In 1956 when the delegates to the Alaska Constitutional Convention wrote the Alaska Constitution a delegate named Frank Barr, a Fairbanks bush pilot, offered an amendment to make the attorney general an elected office. During debate on his amendment Barr argued that: “Many times the governor might ask the attorney general to interpret the law to be sure that he is on the right round when the governor proposes something. In case we had a governor who wanted to bulldoze something through anyhow, if it were a little bit questionable, the attorney general might feel he was obligated to the governor if he were appointed and his opinion might be biased a little bit.” Barr also pointed out that “if the attorney general were entirely honest and tried to render an impartial decision, I’m afraid his conscience would hurt him a little bit because he was obligated to the governor and went against the governor’s wishes, so to remove the attorney general from that embarrassing position, I think that he should be elected.”

    The delegates rejected Frank Barr’s amendment by the lopsided vote of 12 to 40. But if ever there has been an attorney general whose performance in office has proved Frank Barr right it is Talis Colberg.

    Prior to being plucked from obscurity by Sarah Palin, Talis Colberg was a home grown Mat-Su Valley homeboy who practiced workers compensation law by himself out of a small office in downtown Palmer, a farm town (of sorts) down the road from Wasilla. When news of his nomination reached Anchorage, to the man and woman, I and every other lawyer of my acquaintance said, “Talis who?” No one, and I mean no one (other than the few attorneys who practice in Wasilla), had ever heard of the fellow.

    Talis Colberg was so obviously unqualified to be attorney general that a number of members of the Alaska Legislature, including many Republicans many of whom were in leadership positions, threatened not to confirm him. But, in the end, they reluctantly agreed to give Sarah her guy.

    Since then I have met Talis Colberg twice. The second time was a week or so ago on the street in Anchorage. The first time was in January 2007 in Juneau, the state capitol, when I was invited to the Alaska Department of Law to explain the current state of play regarding Indian law issues in Alaska to the new attorney general. During the hour and a half during which I and an attorney friend of mine who worked for the Legislature tried to take Attorney General Colberg through the issues as we saw them, he did not ask a single question. Not one. Instead, he just stared at us with a smile as oddly beatific as Chauncey Gardiner’s. My friend and I departed the meeting absolutely bewildered that an attorney general would have zero intellectual interest in or curiosity about important legal issues that it was the attorney general’s job to know about. But over the past year and a half I’ve learned from others that mine was a typical Talis Colberg meeting.

    During his confirmation hearing, the members of the House Judiciary Committee questioned Talis quite hard to try to determine who, if he became attorney general, he thought his client would be. The people of Alaska? Or Sarah Palin? I was not there to hear it. But I am told by people who were that Talis’s answer was a confused muddle.

    But it’s a confused muddle that, for Talis Colberg and potentially for Sarah Palin, has now turned out to have significantly adverse consequences.
    When Hollis French and other members of the Senate Judiciary Committee lost patience with the stonewall of the Troopergate investigation that Talis Colberg had put Tom Van Flein on the Alaska Department of Law’s payroll to orchestrate, on September 12 a majority of the members voted to subpoena thirteen individuals. As mentioned, conservative Republican Charlie Huggins cast the deciding vote; which puts the lie to Van Flein and O’Callaghan’s repeated bald assertions that the Troopergate investigation is a partisan Democratic witch hunt.

    One of the individuals who was subpoenaed was Todd Palin. But most of the others were state employees. It also is important to know that, pursuant to Alaska Statute 24.25.080, an individual who refuses to comply with a legislative subpoena can be fined up to $500 and jailed for up to six months.
    So how did Attorney General Colberg, the chief law enforcement officer of the State of Alaska, respond to the subpoenas?

    In a letter to Hollis French dated September 16 Talis first noted that the state employees who had been subpoenaed (who he characterized as his “clients”) were in an “untenable position” because “the Governor [i.e., Sarah Palin] has so strongly stated that the subpoenas issued by your committee are of questionable validity.” He then asked Hollis to withdraw the subpoenas and thereby “relieve” his “clients” from "the circumstance of having to choose where their loyalties lie.” He then concluded by announcing that if the subpoenas were not withdrawn “our clients will not appear in response to the subpoenas until either the Alaska Senate or the full Alaska Legislature convenes to issue a resolution requiring their presence before the appropriate legislative committee.”

    It would be interesting to know the extent to which Edward O’Callaghan and Tom Van Flein (who has now left the employ of the Alaska Department of Law to serve as Sarah and Todd Palin’s personal attorney for the duration of the Troopergate investigation) participated in writing Talis’s letter. It also is interesting that, after he signed it, Talis is reported to have flown into hiding somewhere in the mid-west. Since his departure the Anchorage attorney rumor mill tom-toms have been pounding out the speculation that, in so deep over his head that he’s drowning, Attorney General Colberg may soon resign from his ill-fated experiment with public service.

    But if Talis Colberg does not resign, he should be impeached. And the board of governors of the Alaska Bar Association should censure him or worse.

    As the chief law enforcement officer of the State of Alaska, Attorney General Colberg has a duty to advise state employees to comply with the law.
    If in his letter Attorney General Colberg had informed the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee that after having carefully studied the doctrine of separation of powers that the Alaska Supreme Court has determined is an implicit part of the Alaska Constitution, the Legislative Council action that granted the Judiciary Committee jurisdiction to conduct the Troopergate investigation, and the procedure the Committee employed that resulted in the issuance of the subpoenas he had concluded that, as a matter of law, the subpoenas were invalid, and he had then explained the legal reasoning he had employed to reach that conclusion, I would have no complaint, even if I disagreed with that legal reasoning.

    But in his letter Attorney General Colberg offered no rationale, much less a legal rationale, for his decision to direct state employees not to comply with subpoenas lawfully issued other than to say that Governor Palin has “strongly stated that the subpoenas issued by your committee are of questionable validity.”

    In the puffery that has morphed into outright lying about Sarah Palin’s qualifications to be the Vice President of the United States even the McCain campaign has not suggested that Alaska’s governor-girl is an attorney. So what qualifications does an ersatz hockey mom and former small town mayor bring to the task of evaluating the legal validity of subpoenas that have been issued by a committee of the Alaska Legislature?
    Sarah obviously has no such qualifications. But she’s not supposed to. Because evaluating the legal validity of subpoenas is the attorney general’s job, not the governor’s.

    But rather than doing his job, insofar as the Troopergate investigation is concerned Talis Colberg has abdicated his office, first to Tom Van Flein, and now to Edward O’Callaghan. Simply put, when Sarah Palin selected him Talis Colberg was professionally unqualified to be the attorney general of Alaska. And he’s demonstrated by his conduct as a shill for the McCain campaign that he’s also ethically unfit to serve.

    Donald Craig Mitchell is an attorney in Anchorage, Alaska. From 1977 to 1993, Mitchell was in Washington, D.C., working as then-vice-president, then-general counsel of the Alaska Federation of Natives. Mitchell is the author of Sold American: The Story of Alaska Natives and Their Land and Take My Land Take My Life: The Story of Congress's Historic Settlement of Alaska Native Land Claims, which in 2006 the Alaska Historical Society recognized as two of the most important books ever written about the history of Alaska.

    How Alaska's AG defied the public‚€™s interest to cover for Palin in Troopergate

  2. #2
    Elite Member sluce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Top Secret Spy for Leann Rimes


    Very interesting read.

  3. #3
    Elite Member ana-mish-ana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008


    Troopergate is all about getting even, not justice

    Published: September 20th, 2008 11:06 PM
    Last Modified: September 20th, 2008 02:44 AM
    The reason Gov. Palin has abandoned her truth and transparent, open and honest aura with her foolish and obvious coverup and trail of lies is simple. Troopergate is not about trying to get her ex-brother-in-law, trooper Mike Wooten, fired. It's not even about the firing of her Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan. Troopergate is about something the public has not yet picked up on.
    Alaskans can relate to and understand the governor going around, above or outside the law to do something about a rogue cop she believes a danger to the public. Even if that same cop was embroiled in a contentious child custody suit with her sister.
    The majority of Alaskans are looking past the governor trying to avoid facing an independent investigator and instead shifting it to a board she appoints that rarely meets.
    They also are overlooking the silliness of her filing a complaint with that board against herself and later filing to have that same complaint dismissed, saying there is no merit to it.
    The public doesn't seem too upset with the governor's attorney general, Talis Colberg, an accomplice in this case, someone who had previously recused himself but then dove right back in, instructing state employees to break the law by ignoring subpoenas.
    They are even willing to go along with Colberg going on vacation and leaving the department in the capable hands of the McCain campaign.
    Most Alaskans don't seem to mind all the changing of stories, obvious delay tactics, coverups and pure obstruction of justice because they believe Palin was acting in the state's best interest when she, her husband and her staff over and over and over and over again told former Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan and other trooper management how disappointed and confused they were Wooten was still on the job.
    So why would the governor sacrifice her reputation as an honest and different kind of politician just to cover the fact that she was doing something for the public good? Why do she and her new handlers in the McCain camp believe there is something in Troopergate that could cost them the election?
    The real damage to Palin from Troopergate comes with an injury claim involving trooper Wooten when he hurt his back while in the line of duty.
    Independent investigator Steve Branchflower testified recently he believes someone in the governor's office tried to block Wooten's workers' compensation injury benefits.
    Harbor Adjustment Services, the company hired by the state to process, evaluate and decide on workers' benefit claims, had great financial incentive in bowing to pressure from the governor to deny Wooten's injury claim.
    Obviously, the state is Harbor Adjustment Services' largest client. The owner of the company denies the governor's office pressured her to deny Wooten's benefits. Why wouldn't she? Ratting out the governor could cost her the lucrative state contract.
    But Branchflower says an employee with Harbor Adjustment Services contradicts the owner and has testified the governor's office did apply pressure to deny Wooten his benefits.
    Branchflower says the unnamed employee testified, "I don't, you know, care if it's the president who wants the claim denied. I'm not going to deny it unless I have the medical evidence to do that,"
    We know the governor's office was very interested in Wooten. Dianne Kiesel, a state employee with the Department of Administration, tells me former Palin chief of staff Mike Tibbles instructed her to walk Wooten's personnel file over to the governor's office.
    And there is the governor's aide, Frank Bailey, caught on tape admitting he has information that came from Wooten's workers' comp file.
    The very file that includes pictures, taken by none other than Todd Palin, of Wooten riding a snowmachine trying to prove the trooper was not injured.
    Here's why this is all so damaging to the governor. It's one thing to try to get a trooper fired because you believe he is a danger to the public. But using your considerable power as governor to block the benefits of a former family member you have a long-running dispute with moves this scandal into a new realm.
    It becomes about one thing and one thing only, revenge. Not public good, but settling a score.
    Troopergate is all about getting even, not justice: Opinion |

    Another twist to Troopergate- it looks like this wont be hard put a lid on.

  4. #4
    Elite Member Fluffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007


    Nope. And I doubt it's going to go the way the McCain campaign would like it to.

  5. #5
    Elite Member kingcap72's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    10 miles from Pootie Tang


    Since Palin made a name for herself going after her own party for ethics violations, she shouldn't be surprised that they're coming after her for the same thing. Karma's a bitch.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: September 20th, 2008, 11:40 AM
  2. Troopergate probe against Sarah Palin appears to be unraveling
    By kingcap72 in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: September 18th, 2008, 10:14 AM
  3. Ethics adviser tried to warn Sarah Palin about Troopergate
    By kingcap72 in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: September 16th, 2008, 02:10 PM
  4. Replies: 13
    Last Post: September 5th, 2008, 02:20 PM
  5. Sarah Palin has NOTHING to go with Alaska's national guard. HAHAHA.
    By Grimmlok in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: September 2nd, 2008, 02:48 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts