Go Back   Gossip Rocks Forum > World News and Issues > Politics and Issues > U.S. Politics and Issues


Login to remove all ads!
Old September 22nd, 2008, 03:53 PM   #1 (permalink)
witchcurlgirl
Elite Member
 
witchcurlgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sittin' Here In Limbo
Posts: 8,486
Default Why is Barack Obama editing his Social Security page now?

Did Obama Just Touch the Third Rail?

Curious edits to his Social Security page


Barack Obama is such a hard-core wonk, his camp grinds through policy day in, day out. That may be a great quality to have in a president—but it's not necessarily a smart strategy for a presidential candidate just weeks before an election.

And this week the Obama campaign modified his position on a sensitive issue: Social Security. Compare the current "Seniors & Social Security" page with the previous version. Now, tell me why, oh why, would the Obama campaign decide to delete the following sentence: "[Obama] does not believe it is necessary or fair to hardworking seniors to raise the retirement age." Is he trying to stoke anxiety about his position on Social Security?


The new page includes some reassuring language about about "work[ing] with members of Congress from both parties to strengthen Social Security and prevent privatization while protecting middle class families from tax increases or benefit cuts." Still, for those who pay attention to such things, what the new page leaves out is as important as what it puts in.

A move to the center post-convention is a well-worn path. Here are some other changes to the Obama Web site:
  • On education, now Obama apparently expects those who qualify for college tax credits to join jailbirds picking up trash for 100 hours on the freeway (or whatever else "community service" entails these days). Meanwhile, his position on charter schools has gotten both more pro and more con: Under the section headlined (in bold) "Close Low-Performing Charter Schools," it notes that he wants to double federal funding for them.
  • On the rural-issues page, he has removed the mention of pollution from industrial agriculture.
  • His technology page sees a drastic edit of his position on Internet privacy. He still wants to "protect the openness of the Internet," just not in such detail.
  • On family issues, the detail that Obama "strongly opposed" the 2005 bankruptcy bill has been removed. But there's still a lot of language in there about the "dangerous and sometimes unscrupulous business practices" of the subprime mortgage industry!
Obama could take a lesson from McCain's calciferous Web site. Mild, vague platitudes. Strong, meaningless adjectives. No details. Given the huge interest in Sarah Palin, you'd think the campaign might have wanted to take advantage and add some cool new info about America's most popular governor. Yet the recent update to her bio more or less rewords her convention speech. Yawn.

Finally, on the subject of biographies, notice how Jill Biden's biography scales back her involvement with Delaware Boots on the Ground, a group that helps military families. In the earlier version, she "created" the organization. In the latest, she just "joined" it.

Why is Obama editing his position on Social Security now? - By Peter Bray - Slate Magazine
__________________
Eve was framed.
witchcurlgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22nd, 2008, 03:55 PM   #2 (permalink)
tkdgirl
Elite Member
 
tkdgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,459
Default

^^ Interesting.... just posted an article about Obama's newly found fiscal conservatism.
__________________

A government big enough to give you everything you want,
is strong enough to take everything you have. ~Thomas Jefferson
tkdgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
John McCain was FOR social security privatization before he was AGAINST it Grimmlok U.S. Politics and Issues 0 June 13th, 2008 01:15 PM
John McCain attacks Barack Obama's support for McCain's own social security plan Grimmlok U.S. Politics and Issues 2 June 11th, 2008 11:18 AM
Hillary Clinton: Go slow on Social Security JamieElizabeth U.S. Politics and Issues 1 November 14th, 2007 12:59 PM
Barack Obama issues 3-page memo defending gay-bashing spokesman Elyse U.S. Politics and Issues 10 October 31st, 2007 06:18 PM
First baby boomer applies for Social Security Mira U.S. Politics and Issues 4 October 18th, 2007 01:28 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
Design by JP33