Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Transcript of President Bush's speech regarding surge strategy

  1. #1
    Elite Member Laurent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Out There
    Posts
    38,694

    Default Transcript of President Bush's speech regarding surge strategy

    Sept. 13, 2007

    The following remarks are those as prepared for delivery and released by the White House in advance of President Bush's eighth nationally televised, prime time address on the subject of the Iraq War.

    President Bush: Good evening. In the life of all free nations, there come moments that decide the direction of a country and reveal the character of its people.

    We are now at such a moment.

    In Iraq, an ally of the United States is fighting for its survival. Terrorists and extremists who are at war with us around the world are seeking to topple Iraq's government, dominate the region and attack us here at home.

    If Iraq's young democracy can turn back these enemies, it will mean a more hopeful Middle East and a more secure America. This ally has placed its trust in the United States. And tonight, our moral and strategic imperatives are one: We must help Iraq defeat those who threaten its future and also threaten ours.

    Eight months ago, we adopted a new strategy to meet that objective, including a surge in U.S. forces that reached full strength in June. This week, Gen. David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker testified before Congress about how that strategy is progressing.

    In their testimony, these men made clear that our challenge in Iraq is formidable. Yet they concluded that conditions in Iraq are improving, that we are seizing the initiative from the enemy and that the troop surge is working.

    The premise of our strategy is that securing the Iraqi population is the foundation for all other progress. For Iraqis to bridge sectarian divides, they need to feel safe in their homes and neighborhoods. For lasting reconciliation to take root, Iraqis must feel confident that they do not need sectarian gangs for security. The goal of the surge is to provide that security and to help prepare Iraqi forces to maintain it.

    As I will explain tonight, our success in meeting these objectives now allows us to begin bringing some of our troops home.

    Since the surge was announced in January, it has moved through several phases.

    First was the flow of additional troops into Iraq, especially Baghdad and Anbar Province. Once these forces were in place, our commanders launched a series of offensive operations to drive terrorists and militias out of their strongholds.

    Finally, in areas that have been cleared, we are surging diplomatic and civilian resources to ensure that military progress is quickly followed up with real improvements in daily life.

    Anbar Province is a good example of how our strategy is working. Last year, an intelligence report concluded that Anbar had been lost to al Qaeda. Some cited this report as evidence that we had failed in Iraq and should cut our losses and pull out. Instead, we kept the pressure on the terrorists. The local people were suffering under the Taliban-like rule of al Qaeda, and they were sick of it. So they asked us for help.

    To take advantage of this opportunity, I sent an additional 4,000 Marines to Anbar as part of the surge. Together, local sheiks, Iraqi forces and coalition troops drove the terrorists from the capital of Ramadi and other population centers.

    Today, a city where al Qaeda once planted its flag is beginning to return to normal. Anbar citizens who once feared beheading for talking to an American or Iraqi soldier now come forward to tell us where the terrorists are hiding.

    Young Sunnis who once joined the insurgency are now joining the army and police. And with the help of our Provincial Reconstruction Teams, new jobs are being created and local governments are meeting again.

    These developments do not often make the headlines, but they do make a difference. During my visit to Anbar on Labor Day, local Sunni leaders thanked me for America's support. They pledged they would never allow al Qaeda to return. And they told me they now see a place for their people in a democratic Iraq. The Sunni governor of Anbar Province put it this way: "Our tomorrow starts today."

    The changes in Anbar show all Iraqis what becomes possible when extremists are driven out. They show al Qaeda that it cannot count on popular support, even in a province its leaders once declared their home base. And they show the world that ordinary people in the Middle East want the same things for their children that we want for ours -- a decent life and a peaceful future.

    In Anbar, the enemy remains active and deadly. Earlier today, one of the brave tribal sheiks who helped lead the revolt against al Qaeda was murdered.

    And as they do, they can count on the continued support of the United States.

    Throughout Iraq, too many citizens are being killed by terrorists and death squads. And for most Iraqis, the quality of life is far from where it should be. Yet Gen. Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker report that the success in Anbar is beginning to be replicated in other parts of the country.

    One year ago, much of Baghdad was under siege. Schools were closed, markets were shuttered and sectarian violence was spiraling out of control.

    Today, most of Baghdad's neighborhoods are being patrolled by coalition and Iraqi forces who live among the people they protect. Many schools and markets are reopening. Citizens are coming forward with vital intelligence. Sectarian killings are down. And ordinary life is beginning to return.

    One year ago, much of Diyala Province was a sanctuary for al Qaeda and other extremist groups, and its capital of Baqubah was emerging as an al Qaeda stronghold.

    Today, Baqubah is cleared. Diyala Province is the site of a growing popular uprising against the extremists. And some local tribes are working alongside coalition and Iraqi forces to clear out the enemy and reclaim their communities.

    One year ago, Shia extremists and Iranian-backed militants were gaining strength and targeting Sunnis for assassination.

    Today, these groups are being broken up, and many of their leaders are being captured or killed.

    These gains are a tribute to our military. They are a tribute to the courage of the Iraqi Security Forces, and they are a tribute to an Iraqi government that has decided to take on the extremists.

    Now the Iraqi government must bring the same determination to achieving reconciliation. This is an enormous undertaking after more than three decades of tyranny and division. The government has not met its own legislative benchmarks -- and in my meetings with Iraqi leaders, I have made it clear that they must.

    Yet Iraq's national leaders are getting some things done.

    For example, they have passed a budget. They are sharing oil revenues with the provinces. They are allowing former Baathists to rejoin Iraq's military or receive government pensions. And local reconciliation is taking place. The key now is to link this progress in the provinces to progress in Baghdad. As local politics change, so will national politics.

    Our troops in Iraq are performing brilliantly. Along with Iraqi forces, they have captured or killed an average of more than 1,500 enemy fighters per month since January. Yet ultimately, the way forward depends on the ability of Iraqis to maintain security gains.

    According to Gen. Petraeus and a panel chaired by retired Gen. Jim Jones, the Iraqi army is becoming more capable, although there is still a great deal of work to be done to improve the National Police. Iraqi forces are receiving increased cooperation from local populations. And this is improving their ability to hold areas that have been cleared.

    Because of this success, Gen. Petraeus believes we have now reached the point where we can maintain our security gains with fewer American forces. He has recommended that we not replace about 2,200 Marines scheduled to leave Anbar Province later this month. In addition, he says it will soon be possible to bring home an Army combat brigade, for a total force reduction of 5,700 troops by Christmas.

    And he expects that by July, we will be able to reduce our troop levels in Iraq from 20 combat brigades to 15.

    Gen. Petraeus also recommends that in December we begin transitioning to the next phase of our strategy in Iraq. As terrorists are defeated, civil society takes root and the Iraqis assume more control over their own security, our mission in Iraq will evolve.

    Over time, our troops will shift from leading operations, to partnering with Iraqi forces, and eventually to overwatching those forces. As this transition in our mission takes place, our troops will focus on a more limited set of tasks, including counterterrorism operations and training, equipping and supporting Iraqi forces.

    I have consulted with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, other members of my national security team, Iraqi officials and leaders of both parties in Congress. I have benefited from their advice, and I have accepted Gen. Petraeus's recommendations.

    I have directed Gen. Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker to update their joint campaign plan for Iraq, so we can adjust our military and civilian resources accordingly.

    I have also directed them to deliver another report to Congress in March. At that time, they will provide a fresh assessment of the situation in Iraq and of the troop levels and resources we need to meet our national security objectives.

    The principle guiding my decisions on troop levels in Iraq is "return on success."

    The more successful we are, the more American troops can return home. And in all we do, I will ensure that our commanders on the ground have the troops and flexibility they need to defeat the enemy.

    Americans want our country to be safe and our troops to begin coming home from Iraq. Yet those of us who believe success in Iraq is essential to our security, and those who believe we should bring our troops home, have been at odds.

    Now, because of the measure of success we are seeing in Iraq, we can begin seeing troops come home.

    The way forward I have described tonight makes it possible, for the first time in years, for people who have been on opposite sides of this difficult debate to come together.

    This vision for a reduced American presence also has the support of Iraqi leaders from all communities. At the same time, they understand that their success will require U.S. political, economic and security engagement that extends beyond my presidency.

    These Iraqi leaders have asked for an enduring relationship with America. And we are ready to begin building that relationship -- in a way that protects our interests in the region and requires many fewer American troops.

    The success of a free Iraq is critical to the security of the United States. A free Iraq will deny al Qaeda a safe haven. A free Iraq will counter the destructive ambitions of Iran. A free Iraq will marginalize extremists, unleash the talent of its people and be an anchor of stability in the region. A free Iraq will set an example for people across the Middle East. A free Iraq will be our partner in the fight against terror, and that will make us safer here at home.

    Realizing this vision will be difficult, but it is achievable. Our military commanders believe we can succeed. Our diplomats believe we can succeed. And for the safety of future generations of Americans, we must succeed.

    If we were to be driven out of Iraq, extremists of all strains would be emboldened. Al Qaeda could gain new recruits and new sanctuaries. Iran would benefit from the chaos and would be encouraged in its efforts to gain nuclear weapons and dominate the region. Extremists could control a key part of the global energy supply. Iraq could face a humanitarian nightmare. Democracy movements would be violently reversed. We would leave our children to face a far more dangerous world. And as we saw on September the 11th, 2001, those dangers can reach our cities and kill our people.

    Whatever political party you belong to, whatever your position on Iraq, we should be able to agree that America has a vital interest in preventing chaos and providing hope in the Middle East.

    We should be able to agree that we must defeat al Qaeda, counter Iran, help the Afghan government, work for peace in the Holy Land and strengthen our military so we can prevail in the struggle against terrorists and extremists.

    So tonight, I want to speak to members of the United States Congress: Let us come together on a policy of strength in the Middle East. I thank you for providing crucial funds and resources for our military. And I ask you to join me in supporting the recommendations Gen. Petraeus has made and the troop levels he has asked for.

    To the Iraqi people: You have voted for freedom, and now you are liberating your country from terrorists and death squads. You must demand that your leaders make the tough choices needed to achieve reconciliation. As you do, have confidence that America does not abandon our friends, and we will not abandon you.

    To Iraq's neighbors who seek peace: The violent extremists who target Iraq are also targeting you. The best way to secure your interests and protect your own people is to stand with the people of Iraq. That means using your economic and diplomatic leverage to strengthen the government in Baghdad. And it means the efforts by Iran and Syria to undermine that government must end.

    To the international community: The success of a free Iraq matters to every civilized nation. We thank the 36 nations who have troops on the ground in Iraq and the many others who are helping that young democracy. We encourage all nations to help by implementing the International Compact to revitalize Iraq's economy, by participating in the Neighbors Conferences to boost cooperation and overcome differences in the region, and by supporting the new and expanded mission of the United Nations in Iraq.

    To our military personnel, intelligence officers, diplomats, and civilians on the frontlines in Iraq: You have done everything America has asked of you. And the progress I have reported tonight is in large part because of your courage and hard effort. You are serving far from home. Our nation is grateful for your sacrifices, and the sacrifices of your families.

    Earlier this year, I received an e-mail from the family of Army Specialist Brandon Stout of Michigan.

    Brandon volunteered for the National Guard and was killed while serving in Baghdad. His family has suffered greatly. Yet in their sorrow, they see larger purpose. His wife, Audrey, says that Brandon felt called to serve and knew what he was fighting for.

    And his parents, Tracy and Jeff, wrote me this: "We believe this is a war of good and evil and we must win … even if it cost the life of our own son. Freedom is not free."

    This country is blessed to have Americans like Brandon Stout, who make extraordinary sacrifices to keep us safe from harm. They are doing so in a fight that is just, and right and necessary. And now it falls to us to finish the work they have begun.

    Some say the gains we are making in Iraq come too late. They are mistaken.

    It is never too late to deal a blow to al Qaeda. It is never too late to advance freedom. And it is never too late to support our troops in a fight they can win.

    Good night, and God bless America.

    http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/D...3600417&page=4

    And the ass said it all with a straight face.
    “What are you looking at, sugar-tits?” - Mel Gibson

  2. #2
    Elite Member msdeb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    39,431

    Default

    it should just read 'blah blah blah'
    Basic rule of Gossip Rocks: Don't be a dick.Tati
    Lighten Up Francis WCG

  3. #3
    Elite Member Mr. Authority's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Royal Oak,MI
    Posts
    4,631

    Default

    This is what caught my attention:
    Brandon volunteered for the National Guard and was killed while serving in Baghdad. His family has suffered greatly. Yet in their sorrow, they see larger purpose. His wife, Audrey, says that Brandon felt called to serve and knew what he was fighting for.

    And his parents, Tracy and Jeff, wrote me this: "We believe this is a war of good and evil and we must win … even if it cost the life of our own son. Freedom is not free."
    Am i the only one that finds this quote sad and insane at the same time. No one's life should end for Bush and his shitty war. God damn ...

  4. #4
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
    Posts
    55,372

    Default

    I want to drag them to Iraq, beat them senseless and shove their faces into the rotting corpse of their own son and ask them what freedom was in danger from anybody there.

    They don't even KNOW why their son died, how fucking hideous is that? Stupid people, you dishonor the memory of your child because you don't have the will to educate yourself. You're useless, your son a waste, and frankly your entire line ought to die off because YOU ARE NOT WORTHY OF LIVING.
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  5. #5
    Elite Member sluce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Top Secret Spy for Leann Rimes
    Posts
    37,330

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmlok View Post
    I want to drag them to Iraq, beat them senseless and shove their faces into the rotting corpse of their own son and ask them what freedom was in danger from anybody there.

    They don't even KNOW why their son died, how fucking hideous is that? Stupid people, you dishonor the memory of your child because you don't have the will to educate yourself. You're useless, your son a waste, and frankly your entire line ought to die off because YOU ARE NOT WORTHY OF LIVING.
    Sorry Grimm but people deal with grief differently. These poor people need to find some way to rationalize why their son died. They have to believe in a greater good cause or the pain would be too much to bear. I met one mother who at first backed the war and that her son was a hero. In time she changed her tune to realizing that her son was a pawn that was sacrificed for political gain by the administration. That caused her more grief than you could ever imagine. She then tore herself apart with guilt for allowing him to join the reserves to begin with so he would have money for college that she could not afford.

    This war sucks and should never have started. The men and women giving their lives are there because they have no choice. Many joined after being mislead by our president that they were avenging the acts of 9/11. Now they can't get out until they complete their contracts.

  6. #6
    Elite Member Laurent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Out There
    Posts
    38,694

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sluce View Post
    Many joined after being mislead by our president that they were avenging the acts of 9/11. Now they can't get out until they complete their contracts.
    I don't understand how people could still believe this - especially the people that are still joining up today.

    Are they just swallowing the party line without doing any independent research into what's going on? How can you lay your life on the line not fully aware that you're fighting for oil and political gain, not WMD and avenging 9/11?

    I hope people aren't still signing up under the crazy notion that they're somehow "unpatriotic" in Bushy's eyes if they question his decree and mandate.
    “What are you looking at, sugar-tits?” - Mel Gibson

  7. #7
    Elite Member Sweetie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Den of the roving cunty bitches
    Posts
    24,533

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by msdebagain View Post
    it should just read 'blah blah blah'
    I SWEAR to God, that was my exact comment before I even clicked on the link.

  8. #8
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
    Posts
    55,372

    Default

    Misled? Why is it the rest of the planet knew exactly wtf Bush was doing, but the american populace bought it hook, line and sinker?

    And for all the fun we poke at the yanks for being kind of, well, dim.. there's no way that many people are so abjectly stupid or unaware of their surroundings as to dive right into that big ball of obvious lies.
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  9. #9
    Bronze Member kchal's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Somewhere out there....
    Posts
    130

    Default

    Doesn't this kind of seem like a bait and switch though - we are just going back down to the ORIGINAL # of soldiers there before he ramped it up - so there is no 'real' decrease in the number over there - back to where we started - and THAT is progress??? Okay - let me borrow 100k, I'll wait 6 months to pay it back, then say, in order to pay it back, I need more $, you give me 20k more, in 6 months I pay you back the 20k and say - SEE - told you I'd pay you back -
    Money can't buy happiness but it can certainly rent it for a couple of hours.

  10. #10
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
    Posts
    55,372

    Default

    What's funny, is that Bush is already backing away from the "30,000" number of troops.. now he's all "well some have been using that number, it's just a broad estimate.." ie: you'll see a token reduction but nowhere near where it used to be

    are people really so stupid as to believe this? Why doesnt the media do its fucking job and scream "THIS WILL NOT EVEN PUT TROOP LEVELS BACK DOWN TO WHERE THEY WERE BEFORE THE SURGE"
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  11. #11
    Elite Member Laurent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Out There
    Posts
    38,694

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmlok View Post
    are people really so stupid as to believe this?
    Yes, they are. A repug dolt aquaintance told me this morning, "Well, you people [i.e. eville Dems, like moi] are getting what you want! He's bringing a huge number of the troops home. Luckily, we've been winning."

    Me: If we're winning, who the hell is losing then?

    This person does not even watch the freaking news or read a paper beyond perusing Dear Abby and the Lifestyle pages. She STILL could not tell you the original b.s. reason trotted out for the war, beyond "we're finding terrorists" and "because of Sept. 11."

    It scary and depressing.
    “What are you looking at, sugar-tits?” - Mel Gibson

  12. #12
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
    Posts
    55,372

    Default

    ... why do you still talk to this person? lol
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  13. #13
    Gold Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Laurent View Post
    And the ass said it all with a straight face.
    Well he is "intelligent" Laurent. Donald R said so.

  14. #14
    Elite Member Sweetie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Den of the roving cunty bitches
    Posts
    24,533

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Laurent View Post
    Yes, they are. A repug dolt aquaintance told me this morning, "Well, you people [i.e. eville Dems, like moi] are getting what you want! He's bringing a huge number of the troops home. Luckily, we've been winning."

    Me: If we're winning, who the hell is losing then?

    This person does not even watch the freaking news or read a paper beyond perusing Dear Abby and the Lifestyle pages. She STILL could not tell you the original b.s. reason trotted out for the war, beyond "we're finding terrorists" and "because of Sept. 11."

    It scary and depressing.
    The sad thing is, George Bush doesn't even know the reason we trotted out to war either.

    I just wish, which I know it's crazy, but I wish ALL our troops would just ban together and say to hell with dying for NOTHING and refuse to be over there, just come home. Push that asshole out of office and refuse to take anymore of his commands.

  15. #15
    Elite Member Laurent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Out There
    Posts
    38,694

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmlok
    ... why do you still talk to this person? lol
    Work, which means usually we can't launch into a full scale debate. Not that we'd get far.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sweetie View Post
    I just wish, which I know it's crazy, but I wish ALL our troops would just ban together and say to hell with dying for NOTHING and refuse to be over there, just come home. Push that asshole out of office and refuse to take anymore of his commands.
    We could say a big hello to the draft then, most likely. I have ZERO doubt Bush wouldn't hesitate to initiate an active draft and force people into the military if it came to that. Another example of his overarching arrogance, pride, and power obsession.
    “What are you looking at, sugar-tits?” - Mel Gibson

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Transcript of Bush's speech
    By Mr. Authority in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: January 12th, 2007, 06:17 PM
  2. Bush's 'important speech' about why the Repukes lost. The arrogance
    By Grimmlok in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: November 10th, 2006, 03:52 PM
  3. Afghan president scolds US for bad strategy in 'war on terror'
    By Grimmlok in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: June 29th, 2006, 06:36 AM
  4. Continued criticism of Bush's speech.
    By buttmunch in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: December 1st, 2005, 11:13 AM
  5. Highlights 'cough' from Bush's new Iraq strategy.
    By buttmunch in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: December 1st, 2005, 11:04 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •