Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: No military recruiters at young Repub convention. SURPRISE.

  1. #1
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
    Posts
    55,372

    Thumbs down No military recruiters at young Repub convention. SURPRISE.

    Everyone is here... Michelle Malkin. Ann Coulter. Newt Gingrich. Duncan Hunter. Mitt Romney. Jeff Gannon. Sam Brownback. Melanie Morgan. John O'Neill... Oh so many heroes of the right...

    And me.

    And let me tell you - they've really turned out impressive support. At a time when the conservative agenda polls in the thirties, one gets the impression that they are all here.

    I'm surrounded!

    Something else these folks have done well is turn out the new generation of wingnuts. The average age of the attendee here has got to be below 30 - there are literally thousands of College Republicans moving about in Brownian style from exhibit to exhibit, conference to conference, speaker to speaker, ballroom to ballroom.

    Exhibit hall is stuffed to the gills. Freedom Alliance. Blogger's row. Heritage Foundation. American Spectator. Clare Booth Luce Foundation... the Koch group... Regent University. Several candidates have booths. Oddly enough, even the ACLU has a booth (even if they are placed in the back corner furthest from Exhibit Hall's entrance).

    Oh... but there's one notable - striking, even - absence.

    There are no military recruiters here. No United States Marine Corps. No Army, no Navy, no Air Force or National Guard - hell, not even the Coast Guard is here. Thousands and thousands of College Republicans, but not a single recruiter in sight...

    Why?

    Well, I have a theory or two (Michelle Malkin doesn't agree with me, but more on that later).

    Let's try this: CPAC didn't want to be embarrassed when pictures were released that showed recruiters standing around looking lonely. Similarly, recruiters know it's a better investment of their time to troll "the other malls" rather than to recruit these nice white college boys.

    I'm not the only one that noticed.

    I spent much of my day (I'll post audio at CallingAllWingnuts.com later in the week) talking to female College Republicans. I admitted that many of them were particularly fetching - they are. But... I was wondering, I asked, given the fact that there are no recruiters at the event - but there are thousands of appropriately aged potential recruits... well... who would they find more attractive? A man in uniform that was willing to stand up for what he believed in, strap on the M-16, climb in the dirt and fight in the greatest moral imperative this country faces? Or a young guy that's willing to put on a suit, travel to an air conditioned hotel and drool over Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin.

    Every woman, save one, answered that the military man would be more attractive.

    The outlier is a repressed liberal. She told me that it would be hypocritical of her to condemn the boys that were unwilling to serve since she hasn't signed up herself.

    The Blog | Mike Stark: What Is Missing at CPAC? | The Huffington Post
    Seriously, who votes republican anymore?
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  2. #2
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,172

    Default

    prince harry is going to iraq however...

  3. #3
    Silver Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    602

    Thumbs down

    prince harry is a MAN

    neo-cons' excuse for not joining is "US military is a volunater military and that is why the US military is the best military in the world"

    i have heard the line from so many neo-cons

  4. #4
    Hit By Ban Bus!
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    11,682

    Default

    Wowza, sounds like MY kinda convention..... NOT. ew ew ew ew EW!

    They know better than to waste their time with the spawn of the military industrial complex. (This is the best I can do at this hour, but you know what I mean!)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 16
    Last Post: February 13th, 2007, 02:24 AM
  2. Pentagon abandons active duty limit (surprise surprise, NOT)
    By celeb_2006 in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: January 12th, 2007, 03:54 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: March 28th, 2006, 12:23 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: March 6th, 2006, 03:14 PM
  5. Replies: 9
    Last Post: January 9th, 2006, 09:45 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •