Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: A dangerous obsession on the world's wealth

  1. #1
    Elite Member JamieElizabeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    San Jose, California, United States
    Posts
    2,895

    Default A dangerous obsession on the world's wealth

    A Dangerous Obsession

    Opinion Editorial by Thomas Sowell - Dec 27, 2006
    The media and academic obsessions with economic “disparities” have gone international. Recent news stories proclaim that most of “the world’s wealth” belongs to a small fraction of the world’s people.
    Let’s go back to square one. Just what is “the world’s wealth”?
    You can check in your local phone book, surf the Internet or do genealogical research: There is no one named “The World.” How can a non-existent being own wealth?
    Human beings own wealth. Once we put aside lofty poetic nonsense about “the world’s wealth,” we at least have a fighting chance of talking sense about realities.
    Who are these minority of the world’s population who own a majority of the world’s wealth?
    They are the population of the United States, Western Europe, Japan, and a few other affluent countries. How did these particular people come to possess so much more wealth than other people?
    They did it the old-fashioned way. They produced the wealth that they own. You might as well ask why bees have so much more honey than other creatures.
    The rhetoric of clever people can verbally collectivize all the wealth that was produced individually, and then they become aghast at the “disparities” that are magically turned into “inequities” in the distribution of “the world’s wealth.”
    Have all the people in the world had an equal chance to produce wealth? No, nowhere close to an equal chance — either in the world or within a given society.
    Geography alone makes the chances grossly unequal. How were Eskimos supposed to grow pineapples or the bedouins of the desert learn to fish?
    How were people in the Balkans supposed to have an industrial revolution like that of Western Europe, when the Balkans had neither the raw materials required by an industrial revolution nor any economically viable way of transporting raw materials from other places?
    The geographic handicaps of Africa would fill a book. French historian Fernand Braudel said: “In understanding Black Africa, geography is more important than history.”
    What are we supposed to do about these disparities? File a class-action lawsuit against God? The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals might accept such a lawsuit but they are unlikely to be able to do much about the situation.
    Geographic disparities are just the tip of the iceberg. Innumerable cultures have evolved differently in different places and among different peoples in the same places. No given individual controlled this process and each generation began with the particular culture that generations before them had created.
    Some cultures proved to be more economically productive at given places and times, and other cultures proved to be more economically productive at other places and times.
    In our own time, the economic effects of these cultural differences often dwarf the effects of differences in material things like natural resources.
    Natural resources in Uruguay and Venezuela are worth several times as much per capita as natural resources in Japan and Switzerland. But income per capita in Japan and Switzerland is about double that of Uruguay and several times that of Venezuela.
    Nobody likes to see poverty in a world where technology and economic know-how already exist that could give everyone everywhere a decent standard of living.
    All you have to do is change people. But have you ever tried to do that?
    The quick fix is to transfer wealth. But more than half a century of trying to do that with “foreign aid” has left a dismal record of failure and even retrogression in Third World countries.
    Some countries have themselves made changes that lifted them from poverty to prosperity. Indeed, the affluent countries of today were once living in poverty.
    But they didn’t do it with quick fixes or by turning a dangerous power over to politicians.
    Thomas Sowell is a Senior Fellow at The Hoover Institution at Stanford University in California. He has published dozens of books on economics, education, race, and other topics. His most recent book is Black Rednecks and White Liberals, in which he argues that "internal" cultural habits of industriousness, thriftiness, family solidarity, and reverence for education often play a greater role in the success of ethnic minorities than do civil-rights laws or majority prejudices.
    http://www.theatlasphere.com/columns...-obsession.php

  2. #2
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
    Posts
    55,372

    Default

    God, why do you keep posting these articles... it always seems to be neocon black dudes with stupid hair and ugly glasses!
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  3. #3
    Elite Member JamieElizabeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    San Jose, California, United States
    Posts
    2,895

    Default

    Oh, well, I thought that you loved that look? lol
    It's the only juicy article I found today.

  4. #4
    Hit By Ban Bus!
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    11,682

    Default

    There are a lot of people who could have written that article! It doesn't take a Stanford fellow to write something like that! I'm taken aback at the style of writing. Yes, it's an opinion but it reeks of pop culture instead of the annals of bastion-dome. Perhaps he was trying to "keep his audience in mind."

    Yawn. He does make some good points, but overall it's quite pedestrian.

  5. #5
    Elite Member JamieElizabeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    San Jose, California, United States
    Posts
    2,895

    Default

    This isn't very in-depth, is it? I like this type article, but it needs more fact to be "scholarly". And he doesn't make a political stance either. Maybe that's why the writing is juvenile? He isn't able to gain the interest of the reader.

  6. #6
    Hit By Ban Bus!
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    11,682

    Default

    He's doing opinion, which is why he isn't required to do scholarly in this article. Maybe I need to give it a second read, to see if he's baiting in orer to facilitate dialogue.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Anne Hathaway co-star's breast obsession
    By heart_leigh in forum Gossip Archive
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: June 24th, 2006, 05:55 PM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: April 12th, 2006, 09:46 AM
  3. Jessica Simpson's breast obsession
    By MaryJane in forum Gossip Archive
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: January 20th, 2006, 12:48 PM
  4. Jamie Foxx's big butt obsession
    By MaryJane in forum Gossip Archive
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: January 16th, 2006, 05:56 PM
  5. Robbie Williams' wealth stops him finding love
    By MaryJane in forum Gossip Archive
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: December 13th, 2005, 10:57 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •