Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Ballot measure losses jolt the religious right

  1. #1
    Hit By Ban Bus! AliceInWonderland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    you already know.
    Posts
    44,442

    Thumbs up Ballot measure losses jolt the religious right

    Ballot measure losses jolt the religious right
    Anti-abortion, stem cell, same-sex issues all falter; leaders left wondering

    The Associated Press
    Updated: 2:27 p.m. PT Nov 8, 2006


    From the country's heartland, voters sent messages that altered America's culture wars and dismayed the religious right - defending abortion rights in South Dakota, endorsing stem cell research in Missouri, and, in a national first, rejecting a same-sex marriage ban in Arizona.

    Conservative leaders were jolted by the setbacks and looked for an explanation Wednesday. Gay-rights and abortion-rights activists celebrated.

    The verdict on abortion rights was particularly clear. Oregon and California voters defeated measures that would have required parents to be notified before a girl under 18 could get an abortion, and South Dakotans - by a margin of 56 percent to 44 percent - rejected a new state law that would have banned all abortions except to save a pregnant woman's life.

    Red-state rebellion
    "This was really a rebellion in the heart of red-state, pro-life America - the heart of the northern Bible Belt," said Sarah Stoesz, head of the Planned Parenthood chapter that oversees South Dakota. "It sends a very strong message to the rest of the country."

    South Dakota legislators had passed the law in expectation it would trigger a court challenge and lead to a possible Supreme Court reversal of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion. Abortion-rights leaders said Wednesday that such strategies should be abandoned.


    "Voters in every corner of the country made it clear they are tired of divisive attacks on a woman's right to choose," said Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America.

    Anti-abortion leaders said the GOP shared some of the blame for the defeat. The Rev. Thomas J. Euteneuer, president of Human Life International, said President Bush and other top Republicans failed to campaign strongly for the South Dakota abortion ban and against the Missouri stem cell measure.

    'Family values' issues lose steam
    "While South Dakotans fought valiantly to defend their babies, we once again witnessed an almost total lack of support from the national leadership," Euteneuer said.

    The anti-abortion group Operation Rescue said the election results meant any legislation from Congress restricting abortion would be "virtually impossible" for the next two years.

    "America has voted and the bloody results have placed the most vulnerable among us, the pre-born, in the crosshairs for continued extermination," said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman.

    Janice Shaw Crouse, a conservative analyst with Concerned Women for America, suggested that Republicans - some of them entangled in corruption and sex scandals - had lost some of the selling power of the "family values" themes they had pushed in recent elections.

    "Families had such high hopes when conservatives were in power; they ended up discouraged, disappointed and disillusioned," she said.

    Stem-cell efforts stymied
    In Missouri, anti-abortion groups, evangelical Christian clergy and the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis campaigned hard against the stem cell measure, contending it would condone life-destroying embryonic research.

    Debbie Forck, a Catholic from Jefferson City, Mo., was among those giving the measure a narrow victory.

    "I've had several family members that have had debilitating illnesses," said Forck, 50. "It goes against my church, but to eliminate pain in my life, I thought it was worth it."

    Liberal groups did have some setbacks. Michigan voters approved a ban on some types of affirmative action programs, Colorado and Arizona passed measures targeting illegal immigrants, and seven states approved gay-marriage bans, joining 20 that had done so in previous elections.

    Gay-rights gains
    However, gay-rights supporters took heart at the relatively close results in some of the seven states, notably in South Dakota, where the ban received only 52 percent of the vote.

    In Arizona, the defeat of the ban stemmed in part from its scope. It not only would have reinforced an existing state law against same-sex marriage, but also would have barred any government entities from recognizing civil unions or domestic partnerships in providing benefits to employees.

    "We knew all along that once voters were informed about the true impact. ... they would oppose this hurtful initiative," said Steve May of Arizona Together, which opposed the measure. Gay-rights leaders said the election results would likely shelve any serious push for a federal ban-gay-marriage amendment. They also were pleased by the defeats of several Republicans whom they considered archenemies - notably Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum and Indiana Rep. John Hostettler.

    "It's the end of an era for divisive, gay-bashing politics - at least in the minds of the American people," said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign.

    Abortion wars
    Similarly, abortion-rights groups welcomed the defeat of Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline, a Republican who had touted his efforts to seize women's medical records from abortion clinics.

    "It is time to end the abortion wars," said Frances Kissling, president of Catholics for a Free Choice.

    One election subplot was a campaign led by New York City real estate investor Howard Rich to promote ballot measures in numerous states seeking to rein in state and local government.

    Of nine Rich-supported measures, only one succeeded - a property-rights measure in Arizona that would require state and local authorities to compensate property owners if land-use regulations lower the value of their property. Similar measures lost in California, Idaho and Washington, while Oregon and Colorado rejected term-limit bills, and Maine, Nebraska and Oregon rejected proposals to cap state spending.

    2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
    URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15627022/
    awww the poor babies!

    I want their crap outta my country! They need to form a small private island somewhere far far away!!

  2. #2
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
    Posts
    55,372

    Default

    "While South Dakotans fought valiantly to defend their babies, we once again witnessed an almost total lack of support from the national leadership," Euteneuer said.
    They were defending their babies? Why, was a wolf after them in their cribs?

    No no, deary. You were busy shoving your religious shit down people's throats. Your babies were fine.
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  3. #3
    Elite Member panda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Hotlanta, GA
    Posts
    1,937

    Default

    WOO HOO! We're getting our country back!

  4. #4
    Elite Member crumpet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    If I was up your ass you'd know where I am!
    Posts
    7,751

    Default

    Liberal groups did have some setbacks. Michigan voters approved a ban on some types of affirmative action programs, Colorado and Arizona passed measures targeting illegal immigrants,

    Oh, for fuckssake! Get off the rights for illegals already, it ain't gonna fly. Most Repubs and Dems oppose giving them free education, healthcare, or anything else, and that goes for many Hispanic Americans who feel the same way. Illegal immigration is a problem and it's not about being mean. Pussies.

  5. #5
    Silver Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    595

    Default

    YEs you are defending your babies while you vote for politicians who cut healthcare for other people's babies.
    758,000 of the working poor's ( not welfare...WORKING poor) children had their healthcare cut in the heart of TX !

    Love ya in utero! But f)(* off when you are out!
    http://dorkdejour.blogspot.com Just Pimpin my Podcast!!

  6. #6
    Elite Member Sojiita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Central Duh-hio
    Posts
    22,811

    Default

    Don't slap me, cause I'm not in the mood!

  7. #7
    Silver Member LastLook's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    563

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MgMMD View Post
    YEs you are defending your babies while you vote for politicians who cut healthcare for other people's babies.
    758,000 of the working poor's ( not welfare...WORKING poor) children had their healthcare cut in the heart of TX !

    Love ya in utero! But f)(* off when you are out!
    Abso-fucking-lutely! They value some cells more than actual people who are hungry/needy. 2/3 of ppl on welfare are children. Is it their fault? Reminds me of that comedian that pretended to be an ex republican congressman, and when asked why reps. were against abortion, but for the death penalty, war, etc., he said "well, because if it's a fetus, we can't tell if it's gay or not yet".
    Burt Johnson: I don't drink because drinking affects your decision-making.
    Arthur: You may be right. I can't decide.

  8. #8
    Hit By Ban Bus! AliceInWonderland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    you already know.
    Posts
    44,442

    Default

    good point MgMMD; good point!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 13th, 2006, 05:52 PM
  2. GOP engaging in fake ballot scam to hijack MD election
    By Grimmlok in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: November 7th, 2006, 03:35 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: August 17th, 2006, 11:02 AM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: March 17th, 2006, 01:11 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •