Results 1 to 8 of 8
Like Tree11Likes
  • 5 Post By lindsaywhit
  • 2 Post By Heidi Ho 2.0
  • 3 Post By lindsaywhit
  • 1 Post By faithanne

Thread: Jury May Have Sentenced a Man to Death Because He’s Gay

  1. #1
    Elite Member HWBL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    22,363

    Default Jury May Have Sentenced a Man to Death Because He’s Gay

    Source: NY Times

    A Jury May Have Sentenced a Man to Death Because He’s Gay. And the Justices Don’t Care.

    By Ría Tabacco Mar
    Ms. Tabacco Mar is a lawyer who represents L.G.B.T. people facing discrimination.







    A gurney in a prison death chamber for lethal injections.CreditAndrew Lichtenstein/Corbis, via Getty Images

    On Monday, the Supreme Court announced it would not stop South Dakota from killing a man who may have been sentenced to death because he is gay.


    Some of the jurors who imposed the death penalty on Charles Rhines, who was convicted of murder, have said they thought the alternative — a life sentence served in a men’s prison — was something he would enjoy as a gay man.


    During deliberations, the jury had often discussed the fact that Mr. Rhines was gay and there was “a lot of disgust” about it, one juror recalled in an interview, according to the court petition. Another said that jurors knew he was gay and “thought that he shouldn’t be able to spend his life with men in prison.” A third recounted hearing that if the jury did not sentence Mr. Rhines to death, “if he’s gay, we’d be sending him where he wants to go.”


    The justices rejected Mr. Rhines’s plea to hear his bias claim, allowing his death sentence to stand despite disturbing evidence that it may have been the result of anti-L.G.B.T. animus. As usual, the court gave no explanation for its decision not to review the case. But its silence sent a deeply troubling message about the value placed on the lives of L.G.B.T. people.



    In court papers opposing Mr. Rhines’s request for a fair sentence, South Dakota attempts to brush off this last remark as a “stab at humor” that didn’t land well. But a note from the jury to the sentencing judge leaves little doubt that this extraordinary assumption infected the jury’s decision-making process: “We know what the death penalty means. But we have no clue as to the reality of life without parole.”


    In that note, the jurors went on to ask a series of questions aimed at whether Mr. Rhines would be in proximity to other men in prison. Would he “be allowed to mix with the general inmate population?” Would he be permitted “to discuss, describe or brag about his crime to other inmates?”

    Would he “have a cellmate?”


    In other words, some members of the jury thought life in prison without parole would be fun for Mr. Rhines. So they decided to sentence him to death.


    Juror deliberations are considered sacrosanct, but last year the Supreme Court carved out an important exception for cases of racial bias in the jury room. In a race discrimination case, there was evidence that the jury decided to convict an accused man of unlawful sexual contact and harassment because “he’s Mexican, and Mexican men take whatever they want,” in the words of one juror. The Supreme Court rightly found that such racial animus interfered with an accused’s person right to a fair and impartial trial.



    The same rule should apply when anti-L.G.B.T. prejudice taints juror decision-making. To be sure, the history of racism in America is unique and demands unique safeguards. But that does not make anti-L.G.B.T. discrimination any less objectionable, particularly when it may have made the difference between life and death.


    It’s difficult to square allowing the state to execute Mr. Rhines because of his sexual orientation with the Supreme Court’s observation this month that states should prevent the harms of discrimination against L.G.B.T. people. And while bias in the criminal justice system is not always explicit, it was in Mr. Rhines’s case. That makes the court’s decision not to step in even more alarming.


    Sadly, the court will almost certainly be presented with more requests to review convictions or sentences poisoned by anti-L.G.B.T. bias. It should take the next opportunity to correct this mistake and recognize that prejudice against people who are L.G.B.T. should play no role in America’s criminal justice system.


    However, that will probably come too late for Mr. Rhines.


    Warren Beatty: actor, director, writer, producer.

    ***** celeb

  2. #2
    Elite Member lindsaywhit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4,671

    Default


  3. #3
    Silver Member Heidi Ho 2.0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    353

    Default

    The homophobic reasoning is beyond belief But he stabbed someone to death in a robbery, so he probably deserves to be in a grave to be honest.
    joebob and Ravenna like this.

  4. #4
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Antartica.
    Posts
    1,694

    Default

    It's possible. But it's also possible this is an angle by his lawyers.

    Lawyers for death row inmates can be some of the most vomit inducing scum on this earth.

  5. #5
    Elite Member lindsaywhit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4,671

    Default

    Unless you don't believe in the death penalty. Then they can be some of the most unsung angels on the earth.

  6. #6
    Elite Member faithanne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    On the Hellmouth
    Posts
    13,252

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joebob View Post
    It's possible. But it's also possible this is an angle by his lawyers.

    Lawyers for death row inmates can be some of the most vomit inducing scum on this earth.
    People who sentence other people to death and carry out the killing in the name of "justice" are also pretty sickening.
    C_is_for_Cookie likes this.
    "You're going to die tomorrow, Lord Bolton. Sleep well."



  7. #7
    Elite Member greysfang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Burning Down Your Windmill
    Posts
    55,478

    Default

    Nope.
    FUCK YOU AND GIVE ME MY GODDAMN VENTI TWO PUMP LIGHT WHIP MOCHA YOU COCKSUCKING WHORE BEFORE I PUNCH YOU IN THE MOUTH. I just get unpleasant in my car. - Deej

    http://www.gossiprocks.com/forum/signaturepics/sigpic4098_9.gif Healthy is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.

  8. #8
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Antartica.
    Posts
    1,694

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lindsaywhit View Post
    Unless you don't believe in the death penalty. Then they can be some of the most unsung angels on the earth.
    Unless, of course.

    Some of these lawyers also try to convince their clients to dehydrate themselves before the execution, in an attempt to make it looked botched, so they can get rid of the death penalty.

    Scum.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Arsonist who killed 5 firefighters gets death penalty from jury
    By witchcurlgirl in forum Crime and Punishment
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: March 19th, 2009, 11:42 AM
  2. Replies: 21
    Last Post: August 29th, 2008, 06:56 AM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: April 7th, 2008, 08:22 PM
  4. Replies: 41
    Last Post: December 16th, 2007, 12:51 PM
  5. 17 year old girl sentenced to death
    By MrsMarsters in forum Politics and Issues
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: February 25th, 2006, 07:13 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •