Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 54

Thread: WikiLeaks founder could be charged under Espionage Act

  1. #1
    Elite Member witchcurlgirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Acerbia
    Posts
    34,697

    Default WikiLeaks founder could be charged under Espionage Act

    Federal authorities are investigating whether WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange violated criminal laws in the group's release of government documents, including possible charges under the Espionage Act, sources familiar with the inquiry said Monday.

    Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said the Justice Department and Pentagon are conducting "an active, ongoing criminal investigation.'' Others familiar with the probe said the FBI is examining everyone who came into possession of the documents, including those who gave the materials to WikiLeaks and also the organization itself. No charges are imminent, the sources said, and it is unclear whether any will be brought.

    Former prosecutors cautioned that prosecutions involving leaked classified information are difficult because the Espionage Act is a 1917 statute that preceded Supreme Court cases that expanded First Amendment protections. The government also would have to persuade another country to turn over Assange, who is outside the United States.

    But the sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the inquiry is rapidly unfolding, said charges could be filed under the act. The U.S. attorney's office in Alexandria - which in 2005 brought Espionage Act charges, now dropped, against two former pro-Israel lobbyists - is involved in the effort, the sources said.

    The Pentagon is leading the investigation and it remains unclear whether any additional charges would be brought in the military or civilian justice systems. Pfc. Bradley Manning, an Army intelligence analyst suspected of being the source of the WikiLeaks documents, was arrested by the military this year.

    Holder was asked Monday how the United States could prosecute Assange, who is an Australian citizen. "Let me be very clear," he replied. "It is not saber rattling.

    "To the extent there are gaps in our laws," Holder continued, "we will move to close those gaps, which is not to say . . . that anybody at this point, because of their citizenship or their residence, is not a target or a subject of an investigation that's ongoing." He did not indicate that Assange is being investigated for possible violations of the Espionage Act.

    Although the Justice Department has taken the position that media organizations could be prosecuted for printing leaked classified information under the legislation, that prospect is unlikely because of official aversion to running afoul of the First Amendment, experts said. Indeed, the Justice Department has never brought such a case, they said.

    "Whenever you're talking about a media organization, the department is going to look very closely to ensure that any prosecution doesn't undermine the valid First Amendment functioning of the press," said Kenneth Wainstein, former assistant attorney general in the national security division.

    But when it comes to Assange, Jeffrey H. Smith, a former CIA general counsel, said: "I'm confident that the Justice Department is figuring out how to prosecute him."

    Smith noted that State Department general counsel Harold H. Koh had sent a letter to Assange on Saturday urging him not to release the cables, to return all classified material and to destroy all classified records from WikiLeaks databases.

    "That language is not only the right thing to do policy-wise but puts the government in a position to prosecute him," Smith said. Under the Espionage Act, anyone who has "unauthorized possession to information relating to the national defense" and has reason to believe it could harm the United States may be prosecuted if he publishes it or "willfully" retains it when the government has demanded its return, Smith said.

    But, said former federal prosecutor Baruch Weiss, that statute raises difficulties of its own. "How do you prove that a particular cable about secret negotiations with Russia was dangerous to national security? You have to disclose more classified information to explain to the jury the damage brought about by the disclosure," he said.
    Perhaps the most significant issue is the Constitution's protection of people's right to speak freely and to exchange ideas.

    "If the government were to prosecute the person who received and disseminated the classified information - as opposed to the individual who leaked it from within the government - mainstream media would express the concern that they could face prosecution for reporting information they routinely receive from government insiders," Wainstein said.

    Fundamentally, Weiss said, the WikiLeaks case "is not about the disclosure of troop movements to al-Qaeda or giving the recipe for the plutonium bomb to North Korea. This is the widespread publication of information that is important in determining the future policy of the United States, that could be very important for people in assessing how well our government is doing its job. It's a good example of the problems created by the First Amendment clashing with criminal law, the law protecting national defense information."

    All the experts agreed that it may be difficult for the United States to gain access to Assange, who apparently has avoided traveling to the country. Most nations' extradition treaties exempt crimes viewed as political. "I can imagine a lot of Western allies would view this not as a criminal act, but as a political act," said Weiss, who was on the legal team that defended the two former pro-Israel lobbyists.

    Assange's legal pursuers are not confined to the United States. The International Criminal Police Organization issued an arrest warrant this month for Assange, who is wanted in Sweden on suspicion of rape and sexual harassment. Interpol, which is based in Lyon, France, said it had received the warrant from Swedish police, according to wire service and newspaper reports.

    Assange has proclaimed his innocence and suggested the accusations are part of a U.S.-orchestrated smear campaign to undercut WikiLeaks' prestige.

    In addition to vowing to hold WikiLeaks to account, the administration also instituted new measures to try to prevent leaks.
    Office of Management and Budget Director Jacob J. Lew instructed government departments and agencies to ensure that users of classified information networks do not have broader access than is necessary to do their jobs, and to restrict the use of removable media such as CDs or flash drives on such networks.

    OMB, the federal Information Security Oversight Office and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence will evaluate aid the agencies in their efforts to strengthen classified information security, Lew said.

    The White House move in turn comes a day after the Pentagon announced similar steps to bolster network security following a review ordered by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates in August.

    "Protecting information critical to our nation's security is the responsibility of each individual who is granted access to classified information," Lew said in his memo. "Any unauthorized disclosure of classified information is a violation of our law and compromises our national security."

    But lawmakers and national security experts have chided the administration for not moving long ago to shore up network security. The U.S. military has been investigating Manning for months because of suspicions that he passed large amounts of classified material to WikiLeaks.

    "There's been a great deal of attention paid to this issue for a long time and a lot of work has been done," White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said. "It's an ongoing process."

    WikiLeaks founder could be charged under Espionage Act



    All of God's children are not beautiful. Most of God's children are, in fact, barely presentable.


    If I wanted the government in my womb I'd fuck a Senator

  2. #2
    Elite Member Mel1973's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cuntopia
    Posts
    42,983

    Default

    someone is going to be charged... and then waterboarded and god knows what else!
    Kill him.
    Kill her.
    Kill It.
    Kill everything... that IS the solution!
    П(_)П
    twitchy molests my signature!

  3. #3
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
    Posts
    55,359

    Default

    Oh please, charge yourselves. War crimes, torture, and all the rest.
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  4. #4
    Elite Member MohandasKGanja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Wherever my kids are
    Posts
    34,423

    Default

    More legal trouble for Julian Assange:

    WikiLeaks founder appeals detention order to Supreme Court - Monsters and Critics
    WikiLeaks founder appeals detention order to Supreme Court

    Nov 30, 2010, 17:35 GMT

    Stockholm - The founder of whistleblowing website WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, on Tuesday appealed a Swedish detention order made in connection with an investigation into alleged rape.
    Assange's Swedish lawyer, Bjorn Hurtig, filed the petition to the Supreme Court.
    Hurtig also urged the court to investigate why a Swedish prosecutor had named Assange in connection with the allegations, and said his client had been harmed by the subsequent publicity.
    The investigation followed complaints made by two women in August, when Assange was in Sweden for the publication of thousands of leaked Pentagon war papers relating to the Afghan conflict.
    Last week, an appeal court upheld a detention order that was requested by a Swedish prosecutor who claimed the move was necessary in order to interrogate Assange.
    Assange's whereabouts are not known but the ruling means that prosecutors can seek assistance from other countries to have him arrested.
    Hurtig said Assange did not leave Sweden to evade justice. Due to time constraints Assange was willing to be questioned from a location outside Sweden via telephone or video link.
    WikiLeaks is currently the centre of public attention after it began publishing some 250,000 confidential US diplomatic cables.

  5. #5
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
    Posts
    55,359

    Default

    That rape thing is old, and a total set up by the US gov
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  6. #6
    Elite Member MohandasKGanja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Wherever my kids are
    Posts
    34,423

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmlok View Post
    That rape thing is old, and a total set up by the US gov
    Well, going by the story, the complaints by the women were made three months ago (in August), which is probably well within the statute of limitations for charging someone with rape in Sweden.

    And the fact that the two women seem to be Swedish nationals would make it difficult for the U.S. to pull of as part of some conspiracy.

  7. #7
    Elite Member sputnik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    fellow traveller
    Posts
    59,036

    Default

    well, ecuador just offered him residency so he can always go there. and you can be sure they won't extradite him to sweden or the US.

    i'm not buying the rape charges either. sweden also denied him residency, and his own country (australia) was holding his passport hostage a while ago and has been wanting to charge him too... he's a thorn in everyone's side and pretty much everyone is eager to find a way to shut him up.
    I'm open to everything. When you start to criticise the times you live in, your time is over. - Karl Lagerfeld

  8. #8
    Elite Member MohandasKGanja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Wherever my kids are
    Posts
    34,423

    Default

    He can be our generation's Roman Polanski!

  9. #9
    Elite Member Str8_uncut-jock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Horse Country
    Posts
    1,756

    Default

    He should be shot! Bottom line.

  10. #10
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
    Posts
    55,359

    Default

    ^ wtf?

    As if. He should get a damn ticker tape parade.

    The assholes who torture, murder and commit war crimes should be shot... but instead, they've granted themselves immunity and are going after people who expose their dirty dealings.
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  11. #11
    Elite Member ana-mish-ana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,236

    Default

    If anything happens to him that encrypted insurance file that was released last month will be unencrypted very quickly.
    I think that is where the real dirt is kept.

  12. #12
    Elite Member sputnik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    fellow traveller
    Posts
    59,036

    Default

    ^^
    oh yeah, for sure. and i just love how he releases one of those any time wikileaks has a big release.
    I'm open to everything. When you start to criticise the times you live in, your time is over. - Karl Lagerfeld

  13. #13
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
    Posts
    55,359

    Default

    Yep. Personal insurance.
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  14. #14
    Elite Member MohandasKGanja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Wherever my kids are
    Posts
    34,423

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmlok View Post
    ^ wtf?

    As if. He should get a damn ticker tape parade.

    The assholes who torture, murder and commit war crimes should be shot... but instead, they've granted themselves immunity and are going after people who expose their dirty dealings.
    Just don't rape chicks when you expose dirty dealings. Or your gonna be subleasing from itinerant directors.

  15. #15
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
    Posts
    55,359

    Default

    Provided he DID rape them. He hasn't been convicted of anything and the timing is rather suspect.

    Even more interesting is that he actually offered to stay in Switzerland and interview with police for as long as they wanted.
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The Wikileaks Afghanistan Leak
    By witchcurlgirl in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: July 28th, 2010, 11:15 AM
  2. Wikileaks Founder Has Passport Confiscated
    By witchcurlgirl in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: May 20th, 2010, 02:02 AM
  3. Wikileaks.org to screen classified US air strike Monday
    By witchcurlgirl in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: April 6th, 2010, 07:33 PM
  4. Is the US Government Spying on Wikileaks.org?
    By witchcurlgirl in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: March 29th, 2010, 09:17 AM
  5. Replies: 38
    Last Post: February 18th, 2009, 09:47 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •