Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Religious right using anti-gay rhetoric as ruse to destroy ALL civil rights

  1. #1
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM

    Angry Religious right using anti-gay rhetoric as ruse to destroy ALL civil rights


    Monday, April 13, 2009
    Anti-gay bait and switch

    by John Aravosis (DC) on 4/13/2009 12:51:00 PM

    Evan Wolfson points out in this Huff Post piece that the anti-gay-marriage crowd is now not just targeting gays, they're trying to undermine all civil rights laws affecting blacks, Latinos, and every other person covered by civil rights law in this country.

    [B]eware: the NOM campaign is bait-and-switch. The real agenda here is not just resistance to marriage rights, it's undermining the broader civil rights laws that ensure that we can all participate equally in society, even if other people don't like us. Though they wrap it in marriage, the opposition is actually about gay - and they are attacking the idea that civil rights laws should protect against discrimination based on sexual orientation at all.

    Evan's larger point is that the anti-gay groups are challenging the entire underpinning of civil rights law. If we permit far-right bigots to be exempt from civil rights laws that they find morally, or "religiously," offensive, then that carves an exemption for any extremist religious group, and worse, any member of that group working in the private sector, and even the public sector, to discriminate against anyone he or she wants.

    For example, if a Mormon working at a pharmacy doesn't have to sell condoms to a gay couple, what's stopping that same Mormon from refusing to sell condoms to an inter-racial couple? After all, the Mormons discriminated against blacks up until the 1970s, and the church teaches that African-Americans have black skin because God is punishing them for being evil. If a Mormon doesn't want to serve an African-American, he can easily just quote his religion.

    And what about EMTs? The religious right wants EMTs to have the right to refuse to help you - they want to give ambulance drivers the right to refuse to save your life - if they find you religiously objectionable. That means Southern Baptist EMTs can let gays die. It happened in Washington, DC to a transgender person who was left to die by an ambulance team who found the victim objectionable. But if Baptists can let gays die, why can't they let Catholics - who, after all, according to the Baptists, worship Satan - die, all in the name of religious freedom of course? And if Baptists think Catholics worship Satan, imagine what a Baptist EMT would think of a Jew?

    Listen to the words of the religious right and their Republican defenders. They no longer talk about stopping individual gay civil rights legislation. They now are trying to establish a "civil right" by which any American worker can refuse to serve any other American, simply by offering the excuse that their bigotry is justified by their freedom of religion. That's not only patently absurd, it's incredibly dangerous. It undercuts - no, guts - all existing civil rights law, for everyone.

    Not to mention, what the religious right is proposing is that they be given the right to kill people. In the name of God. Still don't think they're America's Taliban?

    AMERICAblog News| A great nation deserves the truth
    Can't we just shoot them all?
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  2. #2
    Elite Member cmmdee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Eva's Love Den


    That's scary and sad at the same time.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: November 18th, 2008, 05:20 AM
  2. Don't buy an iPhone if you care about your civil rights
    By pacific breeze in forum Computers and Technology
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 14th, 2007, 03:59 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: August 5th, 2007, 08:11 PM
  4. Replies: 29
    Last Post: August 4th, 2006, 05:20 PM
  5. Replies: 48
    Last Post: April 4th, 2006, 04:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts