New Incredible Hulk movie trailer

mrs.v · March 13th, 2008, 12:22 PM

kingcap72 · March 13th, 2008, 12:36 PM

This Hulk movie looks a LOT better than the first one. The CGI looks about the same as the first movie, but, overall, I'm impressed.

celeb_2006 · March 14th, 2008, 01:19 AM

Man that looks like pure cheese. Same old CGI. What's worse is that yet again they're having combatants duke it out in the middle of the city so they can throw cars, destroy buildings, have panicked civilians running everywhere and of course, drum roll please, the military out in full force with tanks, soldiers, and jets dropping bombs. I still don't understand how they can do another Hulk after the other one in 2003 didn't exactly set the box office on fire. This one doesn't excite me at all though it has some top notch actors in it.

Allie · March 14th, 2008, 01:35 AM

So... a movie bombs miserably in all aspects... which naturally calls for a sequel. I see the total sense in that.
NAHT.

Sweetie · March 14th, 2008, 12:31 PM

I like Ed Norton but he's no David Banner. That is bad casting.

celeb_2006 · March 14th, 2008, 05:10 PM

I'm telling y'allz, CGI has sucked the life and soul out of SO many movies especially the summer hollywood blockbusters. Lazy, lazy filmmaking at its worst.

For an example of how I think CGI can benefit a movie, I just saw a behind the scenes sneak peak at the upcoming 'Speed Racer' which previously I had no intention of ever seeing. Yet the CGI seems incredible in that movie, used to breathe life and excitement into another world. That kind of CGI is good.

Grimmlok · March 14th, 2008, 05:30 PM

*yawn* 2 cartoons slapping each other.

Bored of CGI.

Remember physical effects and how they brought you into a movie much more?

Fluffy · March 14th, 2008, 08:11 PM

This movie looks like it'll be as boring as the last one.

latinaforever · March 14th, 2008, 08:37 PM

i will wait to read the reviews first.
learned my lesson from the second alien movie

Grimmlok · March 14th, 2008, 08:55 PM

... Aliens?

The sci-fi horror that's hailed as a masterpiece of the genre? The movie that almost gave Sigourney Weaver an Oscar?

latinaforever · March 14th, 2008, 09:00 PM

sorry-
this crappy goodness:
AVPR: Aliens vs Predator - Requiem

Grimmlok · March 14th, 2008, 09:12 PM

oh

oh god, you watched that?

The first one was horrible enough

latinaforever · March 14th, 2008, 09:21 PM

actually i liked the first one

and i kick myself every time i think of the money i
wasted on that second movie.

TRM_SHRiMP · March 15th, 2008, 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweetie

I like Ed Norton but he's no David Banner. That is bad casting.

This guy?

Anyway, Im looking forward to this movie. I thought the first one was OK, not great, but not too terrible. This one seems like it would be more 'Hulkish' to me. I think fans of The Hulk can expect what they wanted to see in the first movie and thats a lot of chaos, destructions, and things getting broken and blown up, and all that jazz.

I have to admit, I just dont feel like Ed Norton is the guy to play Bruce Banner, but I'll just have to see. I love Hulks new CG look, the first one made him look a bit soft. Here, he just looks muscle-bound, raw, gritty, and it gives it a bit more of a comic book feel. And the villain. OMG, but who better than the Abomination? Yes! This is what I've been waiting for. And I think he just looks fuckin' amazing. As for the CGI itself, Im with others when I say I prefer live, real action over computer graphics but this is a type of movie where CGI is needed, IMO. Do you think they could make a half decent Hulk movie if they used a person in a body cast? Honestly, probably not? It'll just come out looking cheap and cheesey.

I dont expect this to be a movie that moves me or anything like that, but it looks like it'll be an entertaining, great popcorn flick. Definitely one I want to go see with friends.

NicoleWasHere · March 15th, 2008, 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by celeb_2006

I'm telling y'allz, CGI has sucked the life and soul out of SO many movies especially the summer hollywood blockbusters. Lazy, lazy filmmaking at its worst.

For an example of how I think CGI can benefit a movie, I just saw a behind the scenes sneak peak at the upcoming 'Speed Racer' which previously I had no intention of ever seeing. Yet the CGI seems incredible in that movie, used to breathe life and excitement into another world. That kind of CGI is good.

That's just cause Speed Racer pwns.