December 19th, 2005, 12:35 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 8
|
I started getting skeptical when i began to think heath ledger was getting hotter 
-- btw, I'm New 
|
|
|
|
December 19th, 2005, 12:40 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,958
|
I think he looked better before
|
|
|
|
|
December 19th, 2005, 02:45 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Icepik
I think he looked better before
|
really? 
|
|
|
|
|
December 19th, 2005, 04:58 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,653
|
Welcome.
I'd have to see comparison photos at the same angle.
|
|
|
|
|
December 20th, 2005, 12:18 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Luna
Welcome.
I'd have to see comparison photos at the same angle.
|
ill try to get/make one tomorrow if i have time
|
|
|
|
|
December 20th, 2005, 10:50 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: just left of happiness
Posts: 1,341
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Icepik
I think he looked better before
|
I agree! Now he's just average. Symmetry is so overrated!
__________________
If I were reincarnated, I'd want to come back a buzzard. Nothing hates him or envies him or wants him or needs him. He is never bothered or in danger, and he can eat anything. -- William Faulkner
warlybard.com
|
|
|
|
|
December 21st, 2005, 12:40 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cloud
I agree! Now he's just average. Symmetry is so overrated!
|
lol o i see
|
|
|
|
|
December 21st, 2005, 06:52 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,106
|
I'd have done him before, I wouldn't now. Bet he's kicking himself! 
__________________
No man is worth your tears, but once you find one that is, he won't make you cry
G_ F_CK Y__RS_LF - Would you like to buy a vowel??
|
|
|
|
|
December 21st, 2005, 09:20 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ant's Pants
Posts: 3,604
|
I don't get the appeal with this chap I'm sorry. But comparing the two images he actually looked better before
|
|
|
|
|
December 21st, 2005, 09:56 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,106
|
I think the facial hair makes him look worse too, he should shave it, then I may reconcider doing him 
__________________
No man is worth your tears, but once you find one that is, he won't make you cry
G_ F_CK Y__RS_LF - Would you like to buy a vowel??
|
|
|
|
|
December 21st, 2005, 07:12 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 8
|
but isnt it weird.. everyone here says people who get surgery looked better before, but they're more famous now.. lol - i dont get it 
(excluding the plastic surgery FREAKS, lol) i'm talking about jake gyllenhaal, heath ledger, scarlett johansson, beyonce, giselle, tyra, lindsay lohan,
|
|
|
|
|
December 28th, 2005, 01:00 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Do fish have boogers?
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Venus
Posts: 20,612
|
new
old
i dont really see it. if he did, it didn't work
|
|
|
|
|
December 31st, 2005, 05:08 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 947
|
Another idiotic Hollywood nosejob for no reason. Blah.
|
|
|
|
|
January 5th, 2006, 10:49 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 31
|
He was much hotter before.
|
|
|
|
|
January 6th, 2006, 06:59 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Happy lolcat land, UK
Posts: 1,959
|
I'd have never recognised him in that old picture. He looks totally different! Mind you, I suppose getting old does that to you!
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 PM.
|
Re: 
