Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: The politics of Olympics: Does it displace the poor?

  1. #1
    Elite Member moomies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    pretending to be a lurker but I'm not quiet enough

    Default The politics of Olympics: Does it displace the poor?

    I'm posting this in the politics section cuz it's not so much about the sport but the effects it has on the hosting country...

    Summer Olympics displace the poor in host cities

    By Charlie Smith
    According to the Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions and University of Toronto sociology professor emerita Helen Jefferson Lenskyj, about two million people have been displaced since the late 1980s in cities that hosted the Summer Olympics.
    “It’s a good excuse to have a crackdown,” Lenskyj told the Georgia Straight in a phone interview from Toronto. “The argument is that the eyes of the world are on the city, which means we don’t want any international embarrassment of journalists filming panhandling or journalists filming shantytowns or whatever it might be.”
    Lenskyj’s new book, Olympic Industry Resistance: Challenging Olympic Power and Propaganda (State University of New York Press), was timed for release just before the Beijing Games and rejects any notion that the Olympics are beyond politics and commercialization.
    She notes that COHRE, a Geneva-based nongovernmental organization, has documented the following housing trends in Olympic host cities: evictions of tenants from low-rent housing; evictions resulting from gentrification; significant decreases in boarding-house stock; inflated real-estate prices; weakened legislation protecting tenants; criminalization of poverty; temporary or permanent privatization of public space; and temporary or permanent suppression of human rights and, particularly, freedom of assembly.
    “As well as the 1.25 million already displaced in Beijing, COHRE predicts a further 250,000 displacements in 2007-08, in addition to about 400,000 migrants whose temporary housing in the urbanized core has been demolished,” Lenskyj writes in her book.
    Lenskyj told the Straight she wrote Olympic Industry Resistance to provide an update to her two previous books, Inside the Olympic Industry: Power, Politics, and Activism (State University of New York Press, 2000) and The Best Olympics Ever? Social Impacts of Sydney 2000 (State University of New York Press, 2002).
    “The most important issue is the continued housing problems that, in most cases, are made worse by hosting the Olympics rather than improved,” she maintained. “That goes hand in hand with criminalizing poverty and homelessness, clampdowns on panhandling, sleeping in public places—all those kind of things.”
    The second part of the book focuses on how the Olympic industry has promoted educational initiatives to socialize children and youth into thinking about the Games in uncritical ways. As an example, she mentioned how McDonald’s, as an Olympic sponsor, promotes school-based fitness programs but will not take responsibility for the impact that its products have on childhood obesity.
    She also told the Straight that those outside of the university community probably don’t realize that national Olympic committees and the International Olympic Committee make financial contributions to fund Games-related research and conferences.
    “In theory, there are no strings attached,” Lenskyj said. “In practice, it’s not too wise to be too critical of the hand that feeds you, so to speak. And in my experience attending Olympic conferences for many years now, there is a very small minority of presenters who say anything critical.”
    Lenskyj acknowledged that there have been gender-based and race-based academic critiques of the Games. But she said that “fundamental, radical critiques” are exceedingly rare.
    Her book also criticizes how eager the media are to promote Olympic medal winners as role models. Lenskyj states in the book that she doesn’t believe that athletes should be held up as “moral exemplars”, because it puts sport in a special place outside the realm of social and political affairs, where it doesn’t belong.
    “Very few Olympic athletes who assume the responsibilities of a role model align themselves publicly with progressive social movements such as civil rights, feminism, or in the case of Paralympians, disability-rights movements,” Lenskyj writes.
    “Rather, they tend to reflect the view that their individual experiences alone, or in the broader context of the national team, are sufficient to qualify them as positive examples for children and youth.” She notes in her book that one might argue cynically that Olympic medallists’ willingness to be role models appeals to sponsors who are seeking a wholesome image.

    Summer Olympics displace the poor in host cities |

    We have posters from countries where they have hosted the summer or winter Olympics. What has been the experience for you and your community? What is your opinion on this?

    Vancouver is going to be hosting the next Winter Olympics (2010) and it has affected our real estate largely, property prices have gone up double and triple. You can't buy a decent house for less than half a million. There was a lot of protests by the anti-poverty groups when our city was chosen as the host of next Winter Olympics. We have a major homeless problem and the money goverment decided to spend on building new stadiums and what not, could have been spent to construct affordable housing for the poor etc, the protesters argued. My impression, moreover, is that after the Games, most cities won't be able to sustain the new facilities financially by its population alone and many go bankrupt. We don't hear much about these negative impacts though cuz there is just so much hype over the pride and honour of being the host.

    If you think it's crazy, you ain't seen a thing. Just wait until we're goin down in flames.

  2. #2
    SVZ is offline
    Do fish have boogers? SVZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005


    I think it depends on the country, places where it's hosted where it isn't so economically stable tend to suffer after. Because it is very expensive and doesn't draw in continuous tourism.

  3. #3
    Elite Member moomies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    pretending to be a lurker but I'm not quiet enough


    Yea the real estate market here was counting on this prospect of future increase in tourism and even immigration due to Winter Olympics where a lot of international guest will get to see what a nice city it is, but there are other factors, for example, exchange rate (at one point this year CND $ was worth more than US $, but right now a little less again but it's not like before when US$ was prized all over the world), economies of the other countries (e.g. way less Japanese tourists spending money now) and so on. Tourism is kind of a fragile industry.

    They are building new highways and transit routes in addition but after the Olympics, the trafic will die down alot and tax payers are going to have to foot all the bill still (most of the funding comes from Ottawa/Federal I believe? And some provincial funding).

    If you think it's crazy, you ain't seen a thing. Just wait until we're goin down in flames.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The Beijing Olympics Thread
    By A*O in forum Sports
    Replies: 265
    Last Post: August 25th, 2008, 08:39 AM
  2. George Clooney: 'Don't boycott Olympics'
    By mrs.v in forum Latest Gossip
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: April 22nd, 2008, 10:10 AM
  3. Is anyone watching The Olympics??
    By LynnieD in forum Sports
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: February 16th, 2006, 09:58 PM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: January 9th, 2006, 09:42 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts