Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: A convenient lie

  1. #1
    Hit By Ban Bus!
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    184

    Default A convenient lie

    A convenient lie
    By John Stossel
    Wednesday, July 5, 2006

    When he was in college, atmospheric-science professor John Christy was told, "it was a certainty that by the year 2000, the world would be starving and out of energy."

    That prediction has gone the way of so many others. But environmentalists continue to warn us that we face environmental disaster if we don't accept the economic disaster called the Kyoto treaty. Lawyers from the Natural Resources Defense Council (another environmental group with more lawyers than scientists) explain: "Sea levels will rise, flooding coastal areas." And Al Gore's new movie, "An Inconvenient Truth," depicts a future in which cities are submerged by rising sea levels.

    Wow.

    But many scientists laugh at the panic.

    Christy says, "Doomsday prophecies grabbed headlines but have proven to be completely false. Similar pronouncements today about catastrophes due to human-induced climate change sound all too familiar."

    But the media can't get enough of doomsday.

    The Washington Post reported that because of melting ice caps and glaciers, "The End Is Near!" But melting Arctic ice won't raise sea levels any more than the melting ice in your drink makes your glass overflow.

    MSNBC and the BBC ran stories on the coming calamity from Greenland's melting glaciers. Unlike Arctic ice, those melting glaciers could raise sea levels. But other reports note that Greenland's ice has been thickening in the interior of Greenland.

    The former vice president's film shows dramatic film of big chunks of ice breaking off glaciers, but the "calving" of icebergs is a normal, natural process involved in the growth of glaciers into the sea. The movie features some majestic glaciers that existed in the 19th Century that have all but disappeared today -- but it doesn't bother to mention any of the glaciers growing in Norway, New Zealand and even the United States. The U.S. Forest Service reports that the Hubbard Glacier in Alaska's Tongass National Forest is advancing so rapidly, it threatens to close off a major fjord.

    He shows shocking time-lapse photos of ice disappearing from Mt. Kilimanjaro. The ice there has been melting for over a hundred years.

    Climate always changes. "An Inconvenient Truth" implies that all serious scientists agree that it is a crisis, and that the United States must immediately reduce carbon dioxide emissions as dictated by the Kyoto treaty the Bush administration so arrogantly refuses to sign -- the same treaty the Clinton-Gore administration didn't even submit to the Senate.

    But even advocates of Kyoto admit that if all nations signed the agreement and obeyed it, it would affect global temperatures by less than a tenth of a degree!

    To achieve a meaningful reduction in emissions, politicians would have to set drastic limits on driving, air conditioning and all industrial production. I suppose "essential" car use would be allowed, and politicians would decide what is essential. A $10 a gallon tax on gasoline might be a start, and Al Gore could funnel the tax money to the scientist "friends" he repeatedly cites in his movie.

    Let's calm down.

    The scary claims about heat waves and droughts are based on computer models. But computer models are lousy at predicting climate because water vapor and cloud effects cause changes that computers fail to predict. They were unable to anticipate the massive amounts of heat energy that escaped the tropics over the past 15 years, forcing modelers back to the drawing board. In the mid-1970s, computer models told us we should prepare for global cooling.

    The fundamentalist doom-mongers ignore scientists who say the effects of global warming may be benign. Harvard astrophysicist Sallie Baliunas says added carbon dioxide in the atmosphere may actually benefit the world because more CO2 helps plants grow. Warmer winters would give farmers a longer harvest season.

    Why don't we hear about this part of the global warming argument?

    "It's the money!" says Dr. Baliunas. "Twenty-five billion dollars in government funding has been spent since 1990 to research global warming. If scientists and researchers were coming out releasing reports that global warming has little to do with man, and most to do with just how the planet works, there wouldn't be as much money to study it."

    And the politicians would have one less excuse to take control of our lives.

    John Stossel is an award-winning news correspondent and author of Myths, Lies, and Downright Stupidity: Get Out the Shovel--Why Everything You Know is Wrong.

    Townhall.com::A convenient lie::By John Stossel

  2. #2
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
    Posts
    55,372

    Default

    he's a neocon, i don't trust the air that comes out of his lungs.
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  3. #3
    Elite Member Just Kill Me's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    sucking on a blow pop and playing with electrodes
    Posts
    15,550

    Default

    We're all gonna die!!!!!!!!!! But not because of global warming...we're gonna bomb the fuck out of ourselves!
    John Stossel makes me twitch... but I will watch 20/20 tonight and I can't wait for what gems he has in store for the viewing public!

  4. #4
    Elite Member lurkur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    5,351

    Default

    Whatever. 25 billion since 1990 -- a few years short of TWO DECADES -- is NOTHING compared to the hundreds of billions of dollars so many corporations rake in EACH YEAR. Scientists don't rake in shit with those grants, if they were that interested in money, they'd either find another field or GO WORK FOR THE CORPORATIONS (i.e., produce biased "scientific" findings) because that's where the money is.

  5. #5
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
    Posts
    55,372

    Default

    heavens, 25 billion over 2 decades compared with a couple TRILLION in 5 years for a fucking stupid war in some dirtbowl country.

    yeah, gotta have priorities ya'll.
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  6. #6
    Hit By Ban Bus! AliceInWonderland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    you already know.
    Posts
    44,442

    Default

    yeah john stossels a fucking tard!

  7. #7
    Silver Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    477

    Default

    I can't stand john stossel. I don't watch 20/20 because he's on that show. He's mean and doesn't care about others. When he had that stuttering years ago I was foolish enough to feel sorry for him. He's a typical neo-con with his head up his butt.

  8. #8
    Elite Member lurkur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    5,351

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmlok View Post
    heavens, 25 billion over 2 decades compared with a couple TRILLION in 5 years for a fucking stupid war in some dirtbowl country.

    yeah, gotta have priorities ya'll.
    They don't bat an eye spending billions per month on war and death, but as soon as someone asks to fund a program that could prevent destruction, all of the sudden, governmnent needs to get off our backs.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Mel Gibson to do convenient first interview since DUI
    By buttmunch in forum Gossip Archive
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: October 8th, 2006, 03:07 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •