Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Canadian PM wiring reporters to lie detectors before interviews

  1. #1
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM

    Exclamation Canadian PM wiring reporters to lie detectors before interviews

    Ok, i'm sorry, but this is just ridiculous. The guy is a neocon paranoid freak of nature. he needs to go.

    Apr. 17, 2006. 06:38 AM

    All this animosity, these bad feelings, this distrust between the Ottawa press gallery and Stephen Harper should soon be a thing of the past now that the government has got this whole lie detector screening system pretty much up and running.

    Since the Conservatives took office, the media have been having a heck of a time dealing with the Prime Minister. Reporters barely get to ask Harper any questions, interviews reporters book with cabinet ministers are cancelled at the last minute without explanation, photo-ops of Harper meeting important national and international visitors are not allowed.

    One might almost get the idea that Harper is, I don't know, paranoid or something. A control freak, perhaps. But the government, in its wisdom, realizes keeping the media at a distance can't last forever. Harper has decided to open the door to reporters, to let his caucus members be as up front as possible, provided reporters are willing to meet the government halfway.

    That's where the lie detector thing comes in.

    Before members of the press can have face-to-face interviews with members of the government, they must first answer a handful of preliminary questions while having a few, simple, non-invasive wires attached to various parts of their body.

    Once the government is confident the reporter is being on the level, there's a pretty good chance the interview request will be granted.

    If you're a reporter, the first half a dozen questions are very straightforward, so as to establish a baseline with the lie detector machine. You must state your name, the media organization that employs you, where your live, are you the spawn of Satan, do your taps run red with blood, that sort of thing.

    Then there are some general questions that go to character. Have you ever stolen a candy bar, did you ever lie to your parents, do you sleep naked, have you ever seen porn on the Internet, innocuous stuff like that.

    Then the questions become a bit more relevant to the specific interview request.

    "Do your questions have anything to do with government policy?"

    This is where you may run into trouble, because the representatives of this government get very prickly about having to answer reporters' questions about government policy. Saying yes here, even if you're being truthful, may prove counter-productive. But if you only want to ask a cabinet minister "Hey, did you catch Lost last night?" or "Have you noticed how the days are getting longer?" answering in the affirmative is not going to make that lie detector needle jump about as if there's been an earthquake on Parliament Hill.

    Reporters will also be asked, "Have you ever written unflatteringly about the Prime Minister?" Even if you say no, and are being honest, they won't believe you, even if the lie detector backs you up. They'll simply assume the machine went on the fritz at that point. The same is likely to be true for the next question, "Is it your intention to make your interview subject look like a horse's ass?"

    But if, having completed the test, you are able to persuade government officials that your intentions are honourable ("honourable" being defined by the government as "not intending to glean any useful information whatsoever"), you will be ushered in to see the politician of your choice, unless of course he is suddenly called away on urgent business, like flossing.

    Also, and I nearly forgot to mention this because it's not that big a deal, there's the small matter of the full body-cavity search for supposedly off-the-record discussions. If you're a reporter, the government doesn't want you hiding a microphone in places where it would be hard to spot. So if you're watching the news, and happen to see Harper snapping on a glove, now you know what's going on.
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  2. #2
    Elite Member Sojiita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Central Duh-hio

    Default Re: Canadian PM wiring reporters to lie detectors before interviews

    OMG..this is ridiculous! The guy is a Paranoid FREAK! Even Bush doesn't go this far. The press there hopefully is roasting his ass for this.
    Don't slap me, cause I'm not in the mood!

  3. #3
    Hit By Ban Bus! pacific breeze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    in the wild blue yonder

    Default Re: Canadian PM wiring reporters to lie detectors before interviews

    I was talking to a friend in the Ottawa press gallery the other day and he said in 25 years of covering prime ministers, he's never seen anyone this uptight. It's overkill -- Harper had about 30 security guards accompany him to a scrum, and when he saw one reporter he didn't like, he cancelled the whole thing.

    I love how neo-con's version of "accountable" government always means secrecy, paranoia and the idea that what the public doesn't know, won't hurt them. But since so many of the press ass-kissed him into office, as an ex-journo, I'm having a laugh at them getting shat on by that ass now.

  4. #4
    Gold Member deckchick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Canadian eh?

    Default Re: Canadian PM wiring reporters to lie detectors before interviews


    And anyone that has read my posts know, I am very much a liberal, but I was glad when Harper got in with a MINORITY. I have always said give the guy a chance, he can't screw up much because he is a minority government.

    But this is beyond belief. I can't believe his advisor's etc are not freaking out on him. He's not going to last the summer doing shit like this...
    Vegetarian - Old Indian word for "Bad Hunter"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. US govt. gives $2 million to terrorists to free FOX news reporters
    By Grimmlok in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: November 15th, 2006, 04:11 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: May 26th, 2006, 08:41 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 23rd, 2006, 10:10 PM
  4. Bush to prosecute reporters as spies; Stalin would be proud
    By Grimmlok in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: April 29th, 2006, 10:38 PM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: November 9th, 2005, 06:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts