Go Back   Gossip Rocks Forum > World News and Issues > Politics and Issues


Login to remove all ads!
Old February 24th, 2006, 11:00 AM   #1 (permalink)
Grimmlok
Elite Member
 
Grimmlok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
Posts: 45,198
Thumbs down Can. defense minister thinks US 'anti-missile' shield will protect us from terrorists

Last I checked, ol Osama (if he even exists) doesn't have access to frigging intercontinental ballistic missile launch systems, nor the BILLIONS of dollars necessary to even begin such a program. Hell, most nations can't even develop it, so wtf is this guy talking about? Stupid neocons!

Quote:
Feb. 24, 2006. 05:04 AM
ANDREW MILLS
OTTAWA BUREAU


OTTAWA — Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor is prepared to reconsider the former government's choice not to join the Americans' ballistic missile defence scheme, but only at Washington's request.

No final decisions would be made, however, unless a free vote passes in the House of Commons, O'Connor told reporters yesterday, echoing a promise Prime Minister Stephen Harper made during the election campaign.

"In principle, I don't have difficulty, personally, with ballistic missile defence," O'Connor told reporters yesterday.

But the likelihood that a vote would pass in the Commons is slim as the Liberals, NDP and Bloc Québécois oppose Canadian involvement in missile defence, outweighing any possible support from the minority Conservatives.

"The technology is not proven at all. We're just opposed totally to the weaponization of space. It just takes that whole militarization another step — a scary step — forward," NDP defence critic Dawn Black (New Westminster-Coquitlam) said in an interview.

The U.S. system intends to use land-based rockets to intercept incoming missiles. And, although it's unclear what role it would like Canada to play, the Bush administration has sought Canada's participation.

A year ago, it appeared that Canada was about to join Washington's plans. But powerful opposition to the American plan came from within the Liberal party's ranks and, on the eve of the party's policy convention, plans for Canada to join were scrapped.

Now in opposition, the Liberals expect they'll continue to oppose missile defence.

"We looked at the issue of ballistic missile defence very, very carefully and we were satisfied that the security of Canada was satisfied with NORAD, by providing more information to Canadians," said Liberal defence critic Ujjal Dosanjh, referring to the North American Aerospace Defence Command, which protects the continent from airborne attack.

"There were reasons to go into missile defence," Dosanjh said in a telephone interview, "but in fact, we believed that the disadvantages outweighed the advantages."

Supporters of Canada's joining the scheme argue it will strengthen the continent's defences against terrorist attacks and is bound to improve Canada-U.S. relations

However, critics fear the U.S. plan risks creating the next great arms race and that it's of dubious value anyway.

O'Connor doesn't share those reservations and, as long as the Americans again extend an invitation for Canadian participation, he's willing to talk.

"Our policy is the fact that the Americans would have to approach us to participate in ballistic missile defence, then we would enter into negotiation," he said. The result of those negotiations would have to pass a vote in the House.

But Dosanjh panned the government's motives.

"Obviously, Mr. Harper wants to seek the approval of the Bush White House perhaps more than Canadians," Dosanjh said. "Canadians, in large numbers, are opposed to us joining in the ballistic missile defence."

O'Connor made the missile defence comments after giving his first major speech as minister.

He told a conference of defence groups that the Tories plan to carry through with their ambitious election promises, including 13,000 new regular soldiers, new icebreakers and a northern port, new transport planes and infrastructure.
__________________
"I can't help it if their ego suffers bystander trauma from my vivisection of their argument"
Grimmlok is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 24th, 2006, 11:17 AM   #2 (permalink)
ohmygoodness
Gold Member
 
ohmygoodness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Posts: 1,062
Default Re: Can. defense minister thinks US 'anti-missile' shield will protect us from terror

dSAdSA?ldsakdksaDSFDSFdsda

I think I'm gonna haff to move to Sweden. They're going to ruin our country, Grimm!
ohmygoodness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 24th, 2006, 11:20 AM   #3 (permalink)
Grimmlok
Elite Member
 
Grimmlok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
Posts: 45,198
Default Re: Can. defense minister thinks US 'anti-missile' shield will protect us from terrorists

The second they got into power, they basically started sucking on the US republican anus.

Amazing.
__________________
"I can't help it if their ego suffers bystander trauma from my vivisection of their argument"
Grimmlok is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 24th, 2006, 11:24 AM   #4 (permalink)
ohmygoodness
Gold Member
 
ohmygoodness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Posts: 1,062
Default Re: Can. defense minister thinks US 'anti-missile' shield will protect us from terror

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimmlok
The second they got into power, they basically started sucking on the US republican anus.

Amazing.
Bah. We all knew it was going to happen. At least now people can see what idiots and complete just fuckers they all are, and vote them out next time. Get this "change" crap out of our system!
ohmygoodness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 24th, 2006, 11:27 AM   #5 (permalink)
Grimmlok
Elite Member
 
Grimmlok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
Posts: 45,198
Default Re: Can. defense minister thinks US 'anti-missile' shield will protect us from terrorists

I'm all for change, just not their kind of change. Their kind of change is the usual unmanageable neocon claptrap that fucks everything up. You'd think that after 30 years of the same policies (which have demonstrably FAILED each time they were put into practice) they'd get a new game plan.
__________________
"I can't help it if their ego suffers bystander trauma from my vivisection of their argument"
Grimmlok is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Couple pays their credit card off; Homeland security thinks they're terrorists. Grimmlok U.S. Politics and Issues 3 March 3rd, 2006 09:45 AM
New neocon defense minister says hey.. US missile defense ain't that bad after all Grimmlok Politics and Issues 0 February 21st, 2006 11:14 AM
New Canadian defense minister used to be a (surprise!) defense industry lobbyist. Grimmlok Politics and Issues 1 February 15th, 2006 12:08 AM
Harper reconsiders joining US missile defense, cozying up to Chimpy. Grimmlok Politics and Issues 0 January 20th, 2006 10:50 AM
Bush doesn't negotiate with terrorists; negotiates with terrorists to free reporter Grimmlok U.S. Politics and Issues 2 January 19th, 2006 03:57 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
Design by JP33