Lawhavemercy.
It has already been proven FRAUDULENT that he never "paid" anyone to keep their mouths shut, or any of that general public massmedia propaganda. So if Michael had in fact, payed his victims off in attempt for them to keep quiet, what exactly would that solved? They A) Already made the accusations B) How can/does payment prevent said persons, or make them, silent? They [and the family] are no longer able to speak because now they have cash in their hands? They can't take the abuser to a criminal court trial? Oh no, let me take a stab at this one, they don't want to go through the 'long' process of a trial, and money will make them feel better. But...they're letting a molester go out free, and to possibly continue to llure and abuse more children!! Gee, what justice. The "shut them up" propaganda would be more adequate if he had threatened them with murder, or any sort of [more] abuse. Offering money will keep the quiet, how? Yes, I’ll accept your money, keep molesting my son and we’ll all be silent.
Just think about what we haven't heard about yet...how many kids are sacred to come forward...yes it should nauseates you because you actually believe this shit.
You know Jordie Chandler's uncle wrote a book off of his nephews' abuse experience 10 years later? "All That Glitters"? He "exposes" everything (at least, thats what the Amazon.com reviewers believed it to be, LOL!). Oh, or how about that book that his own father (and a no named Spanish author Victor Gutierez ) wrote? "Michael Jackson Was My Lover: The Secret Diary of Jordie Chandler". Yes, the father who claimed MJ preyed on his son then turned it around and said Michael Jackson and his son were lovers and the boy wanted it…um….what? The same son he ‘tried so hard to protect with regards to his identity’ he ended up exploiting, putting in private pics, and sold outside of teh states to make a buck…on non existing "diary entries" since he realized all that ‘money’ went to his son in a TRUST and the other half went to his lawyer…all that lying and scheming for $1M? I love these people lol.
http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/...aL._AA240_.jpg
I think its really sick of one who nay says Jackson’s innocence to be okay with an uncle that wants to profit off a possible criminal’s action. Makes me question your stance on pedophilia to begin with. The book is
$118.95. Wanna buy it?
I was unfortunate enough to read an excerpt of it a year or two ago, and in my opinion it came across as a revolting, wholly fictional
fantasy written BY a pedophile FOR pedophiles. I think the author
did work with a source close to the Chandlers as he wrote the book, presumably either Evan Chandler, Ray Chandler or Diane Dimond herself (which is a strong possibility for multiple reasons). I say this because the book has several photocopies of ‘confidential’ documents in it such as a letter from the LA district attorney’s office to the Chandlers (which was verified as authentic in an independent interview by the sex crimes department individual who wrote it initially - though she also said she remained hugely skeptical of the book’s contents and accuracy, and was outraged over the whole thing). At least a portion of these documents and Victor Gutierez’s writings have since appeared in Ray Chandler’s book (though you had to pay him extra to get them) and Diane Dimond’s lackluster book. Of all that I read and researched, the actual written portions of the book seem about 5-10% accurate (based on Jordan’s ’sworn declaration’) and 90-95% ficticious, and it is certainly NOT something that Jordan Chandler or any other (real) molestation victim would had ever written in aforementioned diaries if there were any such. I doubt that ANY SIDE of the case, nor ANY party of the case, would had been happy with what was written. I do think that Gutierez needs checking out badly, to even write a book about such things, and say its fact when it clearly isn’t and then have the nerve to try and make a film out of it.
Thats pedophilia in my mind. Of course I’m just a delusional MJ fan, remember.
I believe some man in Canada made allegations that his son was abused by Jackson, they had all these details of Michaels bedroom. Dimond went out there to Canada to interview the boy, turns out the father of the boy, or the man who was setting up these allegations was a pedophile himself.
Poor Gavin, poor Star...eating candy at the grocery store while watching their abuser been vindicated. (They seem so sad, don't they? LOL!) And that’s the only show of emotion. Not anger or tears. Just chewing, like they’re watching a television show or telemovie?
There is no profile of a pedophile, because there is no set method that people use to abuse children. They do whatever works for them, which does not necessarily have to include general child-like interests activities (or whatever manual you read in those 'books'). What makes us think that these pedophiles lured the child, gained their trust and showed them pornography before molesting them? Many pedophiles just come out on the street and attack, beat and kidnap children to molest them. I remember hearing a story of a little girl who went into a public toilet and was confronted by a man who held her down, raped her then slit her throat. Are we to assume this pedophile showed that little girl porn, gave her candy, and gained her trust before molesting her? I am sorry to bring such a morbid example, but that is the (unfortunate) reality. The belief “profile of pedophiles” is nonexistent, because each of them have there own methods of abusing children. Sure, some may groom victims and gain there trust, and others may not, it depends on the individual. If they find it easier to simply go after children via kidnapping or holding them down by force to molest them, they would.
Ridiculousness. One - Families and/or parents visit together. They aren't "sent" there, or baited against their own will in that essence (you seemingly insinuating) the children are not alone, there is no possible way for them in to be a vulnerable position to be touched inappropriately. These kids are from charities and/or programs like 'Make A Wish' foundation, they come in bus-loads and visit there altogether with their guardians.
Your point is moot. They are in guest rooms if they decide to stay the night. The thought to think "theres no way a child would initiate such a thing" makes me wonder, have you been around many kids? Any brothers or sisters, cousins, nephews, nieces and the whole lot? Don't they have idols/older people they look up to? They will follow you around, they'll you a bunch of a questions, etc.
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by bychance
Mischief. Mayhem. Tattoos. Soap. 
Bookmarks