Scarlett Johansson at The Prestige premiere in London (11/05/2006) - Page 2

Pandora · November 9th, 2006, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by birdmadgirl

I think she's so unattractive. And that dress isn't doing her boobs any favors.

Amen. Fugly bitch who can't act. I still don't get why people say she has a good body: I guess the boobs distract from the poor, umproportional, unfortunate way fat is distributed on her body. As for her face, it's not even a matter of opinion. It should be general knowledge that she is ugly.

Raspberry gashes · November 9th, 2006, 08:05 PM

She doesn't have a good body at all; the only thing 'good' about it is large tits, and i reckon they make her look top heavy for a start. She doesn't have a good stomach, and her legs are short as. Pffftt, pass. Sexiest woman? I'm pretty sure they could have picked someone else.

birdmadgirl · November 9th, 2006, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crumpet

That hair color is vomitrocious.

You know what it looks like? A bad home-color job. I bottle blonde my roots and every once in a while, it goes orange-ish on me. Of course, I have the good sense to immediately fix that little problem....

SuperHeroTights · November 9th, 2006, 11:34 PM

I like the hair *runs*

Somerset · November 9th, 2006, 11:44 PM

Her boobs are in her armpits (which makes me think her famous assets may be fake). That is all that needs to be said about this dress.

Nitelite · November 10th, 2006, 02:34 AM

she looks absolutely horrible. That is one ugly dress

Voodoo Child · November 10th, 2006, 02:56 AM

Her face looks beautiful in most pics but that dress is atrocious.

buttmunch · November 10th, 2006, 05:33 AM

Horrible dress, horrible color for her, horrible cut, horrible, horrible, horrible. I'm a bit surprised since she usually looks pretty good.

Mofo · November 10th, 2006, 06:19 AM

oh dear. I love Scarlett but she never gets the red carpet look right.

OoOitzCathyOoO · November 10th, 2006, 08:36 AM

Boobiesss!! Awesome!!! :d

Chilly Willy · November 10th, 2006, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pandora

Amen. Fugly bitch who can't act. I still don't get why people say she has a good body: I guess the boobs distract from the poor, umproportional, unfortunate way fat is distributed on her body. As for her face, it's not even a matter of opinion. It should be general knowledge that she is ugly.

You took the words right out of my mouth. She's so overrated on all levels. Also she's a stuck up, pretentious bitch. What was Esquire thinking?

Raspberry gashes · November 10th, 2006, 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chilly Willy

What was Esquire thinking?

BOOBS....................

jocelyn · November 10th, 2006, 10:14 AM

there's something odd about this look like it's done badly and they didn't have enough time to do it properly. i think this old hollywood glamour works on her, just not when it's done badly! the dress makes it look like she's got huge lovehandles, which i think isn't true.

southernbelle · November 10th, 2006, 12:34 PM

Wow. I had that hair color for about two days in 7th grade after a Sun-In mishap, before my mom took me to get it professionally fixed so I wouldn't have to go to school with orange hair. Scarlett looks horrible, and that dress accentuates her flaws. Specifically the saggy boobs and large roll of fat around her middle, which she usually hides pretty well. I also don't know where she gets off thinking that bright red lipstick is acceptable with her horribly clashing orange and pink hair.

shaki80 · November 10th, 2006, 01:24 PM

I think she's very overrated (especially in the acting department) and her face isn't that beautiful IMO but I do think that she has a pretty nice figure, even if it's a bit on the soft side. That's a horrendous dress that would hardly look good on anyone but there's definitely no rolls of fat or saggy boobs, at least according to this pic:

I mean assuming her breasts are natural, aren't they supposed to have a bit of sag to them considering their size?