Pamela Anderson in a bikini on a private yacht in St. Tropez (07/02/2006) - Page 3

crumpet · July 5th, 2006, 09:51 AM

I resent it when a woman is called voluptuous or curvy just because they have a huge rack. To me, a lovely figure suggests curvature all over the body with frim roundness in the right areas. Yes, Pam is lucky to have no stretch marks and a flat tummy. Her body skin held up well to 2 pregnancies. However, she has hardly any waist and no butt, so she really is lacking in any true shape. Her legs/thighs look pretty good. The tatas are ridiculous and far from sexy, imo.

equallydivided · July 5th, 2006, 10:11 AM

Nice to see that she's pretty unattractive when you take away the make-up and the beach balls she calls breasts. Slim, yes. Curvy? No way.

MrsDark · July 5th, 2006, 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crumpet

I resent it when a woman is called voluptuous or curvy just because they have a huge rack. To me, a lovely figure suggests curvature all over the body with frim roundness in the right areas. Yes, Pam is lucky to have no stretch marks and a flat tummy. Her body skin held up well to 2 pregnancies. However, she has hardly any waist and no butt, so she really is lacking in any true shape. Her legs/thighs look pretty good. The tatas are ridiculous and far from sexy, imo.

ITA. This is curvy:

This is a board with grapefruits bolted on:

Tenaj · July 5th, 2006, 10:30 AM

Wow, now THAT is an hourglass figure

equallydivided · July 5th, 2006, 10:46 AM

Yes....ITA Very nice....

ROFLMAO on Board w/grapefruits bolted....hahahahahahahaha

crumpet · July 5th, 2006, 11:10 AM

ITA. This is curvy:

This is a board with grapefruits bolted on:

Awww...I can't see any pics. Post them again?

cynic · July 5th, 2006, 11:23 AM

Although Raquel has an outrageous body, it isn't quite fair to compare a Raquel in her 20's with a Pamela nearly 40. Fairness would require a comparison with photos of the women at the same age.

KD · July 5th, 2006, 12:43 PM

Raquel's in her what 60's now? She's still hot!!

aabbcc · July 5th, 2006, 12:57 PM

Those fake boobs are hideous. Why do women do such things to themselves ... blech.

sprynkles · July 5th, 2006, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aabbcc

Those fake boobs are hideous. Why do women do such things to themselves ... blech.

So they can get noticed, make millions, and be famous. It's a business investment & a write-off really.

MrsDark · July 5th, 2006, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cynic

Although Raquel has an outrageous body, it isn't quite fair to compare a Raquel in her 20's with a Pamela nearly 40. Fairness would require a comparison with photos of the women at the same age.

Y'know, I don't wanna go dig one out now, but I've seen plenty of pics of Raquel from 40-50 and she still looked hotter than Pam does now in the body and face.

Icepik · July 5th, 2006, 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrsDark

Y'know, I don't wanna go dig one out now, but I've seen plenty of pics of Raquel from 40-50 and she still looked hotter than Pam does now in the body and face.

I don't even have to see a comparison to know this is true.

MrsDark · July 5th, 2006, 10:56 PM

Here's one from the mid 80's after she chopped her hair short.

Pretty damned good for mid 40's (She was born in 1940).

Beeyotch · July 6th, 2006, 12:05 AM

What Pam really needs is a good set of eyebrows. Does anyone else think she's done something to her face, despite what she's said how she would "never think to mess with her face"? She's got that tranny look about the eyes going on.

sprynkles · July 6th, 2006, 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beeyotch

What Pam really needs is a good set of eyebrows. Does anyone else think she's done something to her face, despite what she's said how she would "never think to mess with her face"? She's got that tranny look about the eyes going on.

WOW if that's Pam, she really has screwed up her face. I agree that her eyebrows look horrible. If you want to add 10 years to your look, pluck your brows too thinly and draw them back on.