Meg Ryan and her newly adopted daughter - Page 2

HWBL · January 28th, 2006, 06:42 AM

I swear, babies are the newest Hollywood accessory.
Your maternal feelings start to itch, but you don't want to ruin your body, or not be able to slip into those little dresses anymore? Do the right thing and buy a baby, preferably from some underdeveloped country so it may even look like a good deed from your pov.
NEVER use a stroller! Either carry the kid on your arm until it's 15, to prove what a great parent you are, or after buying the kid, buy another fashion accessory > a nanny, to do the carrying for you. But if you're really, really a star, you NEVER use a stroller.
Those Afflecks are so mundane

aabbcc · January 28th, 2006, 08:10 AM

Way to make yourself look good, Meg. Sheesh.

Say what you want about Britney, but at least she always seems to be holding her baby, and I don't think I've ever seen a nanny in any of the pics either.

loulou58 · January 28th, 2006, 09:05 AM

white socks with black shoes, hmm nice one meg. who are you? Michael Jackson?

SVZ · January 28th, 2006, 09:07 AM

babies that aren't of her ethnicity, entourage of nannies, plastic surgery, white socks black shoes, nasty hands, gender: female.

yup she is.

LunaShar · January 28th, 2006, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HWBL

I swear, babies are the newest Hollywood accessory.
Your maternal feelings start to itch, but you don't want to ruin your body, or not be able to slip into those little dresses anymore? Do the right thing and buy a baby, preferably from some underdeveloped country so it may even look like a good deed from your pov.
NEVER use a stroller! Either carry the kid on your arm until it's 15, to prove what a great parent you are, or after buying the kid, buy another fashion accessory > a nanny, to do the carrying for you. But if you're really, really a star, you NEVER use a stroller.
Those Afflecks are so mundane

ha, ha, couldnt have said it better!

**PurpleHaze** · January 28th, 2006, 10:43 AM

can't stand her anyway but with these pictures she just digged her hole deeper imo.

Luna · January 28th, 2006, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lurkur

That other lady is carrying what seems to be all the baby's stuff as well as the baby. And they seem to be dressed for cool/cold weather, yet the baby has it's legs exposed. I feel bad for this baby. Are foreign adopted babies going to be the new chihuahua fashion accessory?

I've thought this same thing! Evidently so. Can you imagine these kids stories when the tell all on their parents.
"No more wire hangers!"

fatguyinalittlecoat · January 28th, 2006, 03:58 PM

maybe it's her mom?

pacific breeze · January 28th, 2006, 04:13 PM

It amazes me that people make assumptions about someone's entire life based on a couple of photographs. Maybe Meg holds her new baby a lot, and for some reason, just happend to be not holding her when this pic was taken.

I've never had much use for Meg, but this is getting silly.

Elvira · January 28th, 2006, 07:13 PM

Meg had to get back in the news somehow and the baby is a good way to get publicity. Cute baby.

suede · January 28th, 2006, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chatterweb

That is her new pet, complete with instruction nanny.

OMG - I thought the very same thing

Hair Net · February 1st, 2006, 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lurkur

Are foreign adopted babies going to be the new chihuahua fashion accessory?

i think we have our answer

I honestly belive babies are to more stars than not, are the newest accessories.

WickedHo · February 1st, 2006, 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pacific breeze

It amazes me that people make assumptions about someone's entire life based on a couple of photographs. Maybe Meg holds her new baby a lot, and for some reason, just happend to be not holding her when this pic was taken.

I've never had much use for Meg, but this is getting silly.

You beat me to the punch, Pacific! I recognize this is a site to bash celebrities, but, goddammit, talk about what you fucking know, folks! This is not video footage, people! It's a godamn picture! It's a moment in time, a moment! How do you know Meg didn't ask whoever it is (you all just assume it's a nanny) to hold the child while she goes to get the car? "Wait here while I pull the car around." Is that an entirely foreign concept?

And it just kills me, all the snide suppositions about why she chose to adopt. I'll bet none of you stopped to think about why she may have chosen to adopt a Chinese girl until muchlove mentioned it, eh? Yeah, that's what I thought...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elvira

Meg had to get back in the news somehow and the baby is a good way to get publicity. Cute baby.

Shows what you know. Meg Ryan has always preferred her privacy and hates unnecessary attention. So there!

lennonfan · February 1st, 2006, 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pacific breeze

It amazes me that people make assumptions about someone's entire life based on a couple of photographs. Maybe Meg holds her new baby a lot, and for some reason, just happend to be not holding her when this pic was taken.

I've never had much use for Meg, but this is getting silly.

Agreed.

I also know plenty of regular people who have a nanny from the time their child is born (because the mother plans on going back to work and you need to see the nanny interact with the child before you hand him/her to the nanny full-time), and, yes, sometimes I've seen the nanny HOLD THE CHILD! *gasp* That doesn't mean the parents aren't loving that kid 24/7.

Voodoo Child · February 1st, 2006, 05:17 AM

She looks happy and pretty for a change.