October 31st, 2006, 01:32 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In an Edward and Eric sandwich
Posts: 8,240
|
Truly odd. I would think there would be one candid shot of this kid with one of her "parents". They don't take her shopping, out to the park, to the other kids soccer games, lunch, parties with other babies...nothing. It's not normal. Especially for a young, first time mother who has been removed from everything else that seemed to be "normal" in her life. She would be hanging onto that baby like a freak.
|
|
|
October 31st, 2006, 01:55 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,536
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Somerset
I wonder which one of those women is her creepy $cientology minder. And she does look tired - one of the tenets of mind control/brainwashing is to always keep the victim tired.
|
I think its the one to the right (in the stair pics). I think she has been in other photos w/Katie. The $cientology gal reminds me of Trishele from Real World ages ago.
|
|
|
October 31st, 2006, 02:22 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Friend of Gossip Rocks!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Uranus
Posts: 26,375
|
Quote:
|
Okay ... then where are the photos of him buying baby clothes?
|
Catelogues, baby, catelogues.
__________________
The best art is understood by the fewest number of people.-James Franco on General Hospital
|
|
|
November 1st, 2006, 02:11 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Hit By Ban Bus!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rrrrrrrrrussia
Posts: 620
|
shit everything about her is just so annoying so ugly
|
|
|
November 1st, 2006, 08:52 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,525
|
That's all she ever does...shops
|
|
|
November 1st, 2006, 10:38 AM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 1,227
|
^^That's not true! She also incubates "feotuses."
|
|
|
November 1st, 2006, 10:43 AM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,069
|
It's very weird that neither one of them is ever photographed with the baby. I still think that the surrogate they had either miscarried, backed out, or gave birth to a severely handicapped child that TomKat didn't want. There is no baby, and the Vanity Fair "PhotoShop Magic" spread was just a ploy to buy them some more time while they scramble to find a replacement and then wait for it to grow to a size at which they can pass it off as just being "petite" instead of 6 months younger than it actually is.
|
|
|
November 1st, 2006, 12:13 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,507
|
God forbid if Tom ever lets this girl wear ANY COLOUR!!!
__________________
Go Habs Go!!
Last edited by mtlebay : November 1st, 2006 at 12:24 PM.
|
|
|
November 1st, 2006, 12:50 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In search of non disfigurated fatherwood
Posts: 7,164
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by buttmunch
Catelogues, baby, catelogues.
|
Oh like when he ordered Suri from the catelogue?
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03 AM.
|