Go Back   Gossip Rocks Forum > Photos > Photo Archive


Login to remove all ads!
Old October 24th, 2006, 12:15 PM   #16 (permalink)
Sylkyn
Elite Member
 
Sylkyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Indahood, AL
Posts: 1,642
Send a message via MSN to Sylkyn Send a message via Yahoo to Sylkyn
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hollyweird View Post
Could it be they don't take Suri out is because of all the paparazzi frenzy it would cause? The paps would be all over them trying to get a picture of the baby. You would think if they did take her out more, the paps would slow down, but I don't think they would. Maybe same for Brad/Angie with Shiloh.
This is probably the case now but it wouldn't be such a huge paparazzi deal if they'd just started off more visibly, instead of seemingly hiding the kid. If I was them, and knew that just about everyone thought my child didn't really exist, I believe I'd take him/her out in public a few times just to disavow the notion. They might be all over them at first, but I definitely believe it wouldn't be nearly as bad as it will be should they ever decide to grace the public with an "out and about" family pic.

Which I think we will not see for a very long time, if ever.

Also, I do think she looks better in these pics than she has for ages. That color (looks like fuchsia on my screen) suits her well.
__________________
Look, sweetheart, I can drink you under any goddamn table you want, so don't worry about me.-"Martha", Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?

Last edited by Sylkyn : October 24th, 2006 at 12:16 PM. Reason: screwy grammar
Sylkyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24th, 2006, 04:11 PM   #17 (permalink)
buttmunch
Friend of Gossip Rocks!
 
buttmunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Uranus
Posts: 26,281
Default

Not an ounce of style. And yes, where is the lovely pillow she carried around for 11 fucking months?
__________________
The religion of one age is the literary entertainment of the next.--Ralph Waldo Emerson
buttmunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24th, 2006, 04:22 PM   #18 (permalink)
southernbelle
Elite Member
 
southernbelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,069
Default

I think the thing that appeared in Vanity Fair as their baby (a Tom-Katie morph photoshopped with a real baby that someone rented for the shoot) was not actually Suri, and they have to wait until she gets old enough to where that's not painfully obvious. Either that, or they still haven't been able to obtain a baby.
southernbelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24th, 2006, 10:07 PM   #19 (permalink)
Moomoo
Silver Member
 
Moomoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 368
Default

She has the aura of Stepford wife..a little like Nicole did in the early days.
Moomoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.gossiprocks.com/forum/photo-archive/29070-katie-holmes-david-orgell-jewelry-store-10-18-06-a.html
Posted By For Type Date
Flashy Shades: 11_06 This thread Refback February 11th, 2007 11:59 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Katie Holmes can't see clearly moomies Gossip Archive 24 August 8th, 2007 01:34 PM
David Beckham to miss Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes wedding enctpc Gossip Archive 9 October 26th, 2006 07:21 PM
Mary-Kate Olsen leaving a jewelry store in Beverly Hills (21/08/2006) Blackberry Photo Archive 4 August 26th, 2006 01:09 AM
Courteney Cox, David & Rosanna Arquette at 'A Night at the Comedy Store' (08/14/06) Otaku Photo Archive 2 August 16th, 2006 01:02 PM
Britney at a jewelry store. LunaShar Photo Archive 31 November 25th, 2005 04:37 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
Design by JP33