Kate Hudson and son Ryder play in the sand, Malibu (06/28/2006) - Page 2

KD · July 2nd, 2006, 11:38 PM

Kate has very nice legs, I was thinking she was doing yoga poses perhaps?? As far as boys w/ long hair is this a trend? Like someone said, Romeo, Ryder, Elle Macpherson's son. Not fond of it myself. I Guess SPF will be sporting cornrows like daddy at some point.

happy8 · July 3rd, 2006, 02:11 AM

The trend these days is to load up on bracelets, necklaces, etc before you head to the pool, it's just ridiculous. When I tan, I don't want lines, but what do I know..LOL

YIKES.. good thing the kids parents are famous.... it may be his only salvation

olivia720 · July 3rd, 2006, 02:42 AM

Funny how the kid has red hair. I thought it was a girl! Kate is hot.

sweetrebel · July 3rd, 2006, 10:17 AM

I love her! I think she is a good actress. I personally don't care for the long hair on boys either...

crumpet · July 3rd, 2006, 10:31 AM

It's unfortunate that he looks more like his dad.

Yeah, he's fug alright,lol!

Icepik · July 3rd, 2006, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glambition

Boys take a lot longer to learn. Many aren't fully potty-trained until they are about four.

Boys take longer to learn? I've heard this, too - but I think it's meant in months, not 2 or so years longer. My son was potty trained by almost 2.

And I have never heard of children not being fully potty trained until they are 4. I worked in a nursery school for children 1 - 4 for 3 years and not once did I see a child who wasnt potty trained by 2 1/2.

aabbcc · July 3rd, 2006, 11:48 AM

I can't remember how old my son was when he was finally trained - it was well before 4yo though. I do remember that it was much harder with him than my daughter. She took to it right away, but he resisted.

KD · July 3rd, 2006, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Icepik

Boys take longer to learn? I've heard this, too - but I think it's meant in months, not 2 or so years longer. My son was potty trained by almost 2.

And I have never heard of children not being fully potty trained until they are 4. I worked in a nursery school for children 1 - 4 for 3 years and not once did I see a child who wasnt potty trained by 2 1/2.

I to worked in a daycare for my workstudy while going to college and unfortuately I saw 3+ year olds that weren't fully potty trained. It was NOT fun changing their shitty pants!

Icepik · July 3rd, 2006, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KD

I to worked in a daycare for my workstudy while going to college and unfortuately I saw 3+ year olds that weren't fully potty trained. It was NOT fun changing their shitty pants!

Seriously, I would think there is something wrong with these children. If they are able to communicate (they were able to communicate, weren't they?

) they would be able to ask for help or atleast tell someone they needed to go??

I would think any child who is four and still in need of diapers is either lazy or too well catered to - and they obviously know it.

B.C. · July 3rd, 2006, 12:43 PM

Seems like the lil guy would be more comfortable with that hair cut off. With a girl you can at least put barrettes in or pull their hair out of their face.

Algernon · July 3rd, 2006, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Icepik

Boys take longer to learn? I've heard this, too - but I think it's meant in months, not 2 or so years longer. My son was potty trained by almost 2.

And I have never heard of children not being fully potty trained until they are 4. I worked in a nursery school for children 1 - 4 for 3 years and not once did I see a child who wasnt potty trained by 2 1/2.

Wow! There's some superbabies!!! I've worked with young children for years and have seen boys trained at 1.5, boys trained at 3.5. Yes, 4 is getting very old unless the child has development issues.

Ryder is probably just about ready to train. I just finished training my son, his 3rd b-day was yesterday. Both my boys weren't ready until they were almost three.

Well now THAT was off topic. Ryder's hair is really unfortunate...

Icepik · July 3rd, 2006, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Algernon

Wow! There's some superbabies!!! I've worked with young children for years and have seen boys trained at 1.5, boys trained at 3.5. Yes, 4 is getting very old unless the child has development issues.

Ryder is probably just about ready to train. I just finished training my son, his 3rd b-day was yesterday. Both my boys weren't ready until they were almost three.

Well now THAT was off topic. Ryder's hair is really unfortunate...

LOL!!

No, I meant I had worked with children in that age range - not that they were all potty-trained. Just that none of the 4 year olds I dealt with were still in diapers.

Quote:

Originally Posted by B.C.

Seems like the lil guy would be more comfortable with that hair cut off. With a girl you can at least put barrettes in or pull their hair out of their face.

I don't think the long hair would bug him - just like it wouldn't bother a little girl with hair that long. (I wouldn't be surprised if Kate did put things in his hair)

I think I would be more comfortable with his hair cut off, though

KD · July 3rd, 2006, 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Icepik

Seriously, I would think there is something wrong with these children. If they are able to communicate (they were able to communicate, weren't they?

) they would be able to ask for help or atleast tell someone they needed to go??

I would think any child who is four and still in need of diapers is either lazy or too well catered to - and they obviously know it.

I think many of them (all boys BTW) would get to playing and just not take the time to go. You know?