September 2nd, 2006, 02:43 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Silver Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 684
|
Maggie Gyllenhaal and Peter Sarsgaard pictured in NYC (08/31/2006)
|
|
|
|
September 2nd, 2006, 05:08 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 28,327
|
As far as looks go, I've always thought she was like Kirsten Dunst; not pretty.
|
|
|
|
|
September 2nd, 2006, 06:10 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 93
|
shes so fat!
|
|
|
|
|
September 2nd, 2006, 06:11 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 28,327
|
well, she IS pregnant.
|
|
|
|
|
September 2nd, 2006, 06:18 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,221
|
and she IS ugly
|
|
|
|
|
September 2nd, 2006, 06:19 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 28,327
|
^^haha 
|
|
|
|
|
September 2nd, 2006, 10:13 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: northwest mississippi
Posts: 5,449
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sketch
shes so fat!
|
Huh?
|
|
|
|
|
September 2nd, 2006, 11:24 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Agen, France
Posts: 195
|
I think she looks good...
|
|
|
|
|
September 2nd, 2006, 02:29 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,280
|
I think her body looks good for being as far along preggo as she is. It's a baby, not fat. But I'm sure she'll be back to the usual LA-rexic size in record time after she drops.
__________________
The more complicated the Starbuck's order, the bigger the asshole~G. Carlin
|
|
|
|
|
September 3rd, 2006, 01:21 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 93
|
of course she's pregnant but she's too fat for pregnancy
|
|
|
|
|
September 3rd, 2006, 06:19 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,501
|
^ i'm speechless! god, i hope you are kidding!
|
|
|
|
|
September 3rd, 2006, 07:51 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In a room full of JBF's
Posts: 3,894
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sketch
of course she's pregnant but she's too fat for pregnancy
|
You cant be serious?
|
|
|
|
|
September 3rd, 2006, 02:27 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,280
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sketch
of course she's pregnant but she's too fat for pregnancy
|
Are you kidding? I certainly hope so.
__________________
The more complicated the Starbuck's order, the bigger the asshole~G. Carlin
|
|
|
|
|
September 3rd, 2006, 07:41 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 55
|
Peter sure has a lot of things stuffed in his pockets 
|
|
|
|
|
September 3rd, 2006, 10:39 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Elitist tree hugging liberal
Posts: 6,349
|
Good lord, she's perfectly fine for being pregnant!! Too many of these women are concerned with only gaining 20 pounds and dropping the pregnancy weight 3 weeks post-baby.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 PM.
|
