Hmm, she was on Parkinson last night.
She looked okay from afar, quite pretty but up close I wasn't that impressed! She looks as though she's had an upper face life because she has fairly few wrinkles above nose level, but bad nasal-labials!
Hmm, she was on Parkinson last night.
She looked okay from afar, quite pretty but up close I wasn't that impressed! She looks as though she's had an upper face life because she has fairly few wrinkles above nose level, but bad nasal-labials!
i feel embarrassed for her. do you think she knows how badly this movie is going to flop?
yeah i know, i seen a preview before and it was all tits and humping. I think theyre gonna sell it on the sex basis and get the money back from sad men who'll only watch it for that sole reason, and then it'll be a 'hit'Originally Posted by calendargurl
![]()
I have better things to do, thank youOriginally Posted by loulou58
She does look great though.
Not many 39+ women look like this.
♫ÀàâäçÉéèêë`ï î½ñÕôöøü ∴|| • ~∞≠∝ ♫♪ £$¢¥ -4°C©®™¹ ² ³
that's because she killed them all.
39+? She's 48!
Thats not called older lady beauty thats called a damn god plastic surgeon and personal trainer![]()
^^ I realize that, but since you're not supposed to ask a lady her
age or her weight (remember?), I thought it best to euphemize.
Not that it did a hell of a lot of good.
And not that she's famous for being a lady. (NSFW)
BTW, the first one is one TV now, and it looks like she had small implants
in -- just to give them a dome-like shape when she's on her back.
Her boobs are far enough apart you could see a movie screen between
them; that gap isn't quite as pronounced in her 1984 tits--er, film.
♫ÀàâäçÉéèêë`ï î½ñÕôöøü ∴|| • ~∞≠∝ ♫♪ £$¢¥ -4°C©®™¹ ² ³
is there anyone else that feels violent when they looks at her? or is it just me?
Monkey I agree, it just seems like a fun thing to do!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks