I just hope that baby is alive and well. And found.
I didn't start out to collect diamonds, but somehow they just kept piling up.-Mae West
Yeah, that was confusing. Maybe the parents claim(ed) the charges were for paperwork but the investigation found it was for stationary.Originally Posted by LynnieD
Seems odd someone would jack your debit card to buy stationary. Maybe the thief wanted to send a personal thank you note.
When are you people going to learn to listen to the great and mighty Mel??? I done tole y'all 3 fecking times!
They're both proud drunks, they're both proud sluts and they're both proud wearers of thirsty weaves. They both probably think that the other one is swallowing up the entire world's supply of vodka, peen and yellow weaves. Michael K (re Brandi & Chelsea)
┌П┐(•_•)┌П┐twitchy molests my signature!
At the top of the story, the father makes the claim that the card was fraudulently used by a company that helps change babies' names. Then, the detectives follow up by saying that the card was used to attempt to buy stationary, but that it had nothing to do with the case. That seems to be a pretty big conflict between the father and the police. I've never heard of a firm that helps change babies' names, unless it is a law firm that submits paperwork to SSA and various other agencies to change information. And if you stole Lisa, would you REALLY turn around and try to use the dad's debit card to change Lisa's (or some other baby's) identity?
Second, I keep thinking back to fact that three cell phones were supposedly stolen from the house. I still would like to know why they had that many - and why would someone stealing a baby bother to steal cell phones? Especially, if the police could potentially track the phone to the kidnappers.
Third, if the Irwins actually had something to do with Lisa's disappearance, I would tend to think they would lie low, and hope things blow over rather than go back out and bring media attention to the case again. The whole thing is just bizarre.
That's what I was attempting to say, in a very general way----the police are directly contradicting what the parents say. So....which is it? Stationary or changing baby's names? Seems like a big difference to me. Someone's lying again here.
On the Today show they had the parents on yesterday I think it was, the card was used at a site that first led to a place to have a name change and then the site changed to a stationary site. It was an online site that changed it's name or whatever
Silly bitches, twitchy links are NOT for kids!-Mel
Lying liars who lie.
"Schadenfreude, hard to spell, easy to feel." ~VenusinFauxFurs
"Scoffing is one of my main hobbies!" ~Trixie
The attorney also said they had screen shots of the site and gave it to the police.
There are also 3 witnesses who say they saw a man carrying a baby on the road not far from their house, around midnight. The descriptions fit a "person of interest". Then a call was made from the Mom's cell that night. It was to a woman who knows the man who is the person of interest. The mother does not know that woman and phone records she had never called that number before.
You don't engage with crazies. Because they're, you know, fucking crazy. - WitchCurlGirl
Makes no sense to me either...unless the debit card was reported missing the night she disappeared, I don't see how a $69 fraudulent charge is related to the case. Seems to me it would cost a lot more than that to change a baby's name, and what kind of company does that...and sells stationery?
These people don't give a fuck about YOU or us. It's a message board, for Christ's sake. ~ mrs.v ~
~"Fuck off! Aim higher! Get a life! Get away from me!" ~the lovely and talented Miss Julia Roberts~
And don't you think if you kidnapped a baby and needed to change names/SSN, etc--wouldn't that be done under the table?? I mean, this wasn't a legal adoption or something--like adopting kid from China and need to change their name legally and get them established in this country. Just makes no sense...
The parents say the charge was connected to an overseas company that changes names. No need to go through SSA or vital records or the court if that's so. Interesting to think that she could still be alive out there and the person/people who have her possibly have some type of documentation saying she was born outside of the States.
It's really bizarre though, that they would use the father's banking information to get the papers.
So... whatever happened to those 3 missing cellphones? Never found or traced?... odd. Why would anyone go to the trouble of stealing cellphones to NOT USE them when supposedly mom was tanked enough to sleep while some stranger snuck in & stole their baby....
Lace bras... Great in theory, itchy nips in reality
Someone would steal all the cell phones to prevent the parents from calling the police immediately in order to buy the kidnapper more time. But this would mean they knew the parents didn't have a landline.
It could also be a way of the parents avoiding the typical evaluation of the 911 call that is often done by police. If their phones were missing it could throw off their whole response to the situation.
I'm of two minds about this story. the fact that someone saw a person carrying a baby through their streets, and the fact that the cell phone stolen was used to call someone that knew the parents is weird.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks