Gossip Rocks Forum  

Go Back   Gossip Rocks Forum > World News and Issues > News


Login to remove the ads!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 28th, 2007, 07:47 PM   #1 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
Laurent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Harper Valley
Posts: 26,764
Default "Diaper-free" movement encourages parents to potty train from birth

Quote:
Parents begin potty training at birth
By RODRIQUE NGOWI, Associated Press Writer
Mon Aug 27, 2:05 PM ET

SUTTON, Mass. - Thirteen-month-old Dominic Klatt stopped banging the furniture in the verandah, looked at his mother and clasped his right hand around his left wrist to signal that he needed to go to the bathroom.

His mother took the diaper-less tot to a tree in the yard, held him in a squatting position and made a gentle hissing sound — prompting the infant to relieve himself on cue before he rushed back to play.

Dominic is a product of a growing "diaper-free" movement founded on the belief that babies are born with an instinctive ability to signal when they have to answer nature's call. Parents who practice the so-called "elimination communication" learn to read their children's body language to help them recognize the need, and they mimic the sounds that a child associates with the bathroom.

Erinn Klatt began toilet training her son at birth and said he has not wet his bed at night since he was six months old.

"The nice part is ... really getting the majority of poops in the toilet versus having to clean that," Klatt said. "I don't have to wake up at night and change diapers or have wet sheets anywhere. That's really nice.

"And being able to travel without a big, bloated diaper bag is terrific," she said.

Some parents and toilet training experts are skeptical.

"They teach them from birth? Oh, my God!" said 40-year-old Lisa Bolcato, as she held her 5-month-old daughter, Rose, at a park on Boston Common. "When you're getting two hours of sleeps between feedings, I don't think that you have the time to do it. You just make sure that your child's healthy and happy and well-fed."

Still, the practice is common in many parts of rural Africa and Asia where parents cannot afford diapers.

In the United States, many of the parents are stay-at-home-moms, but there are also working mothers. Some meet in online groups, at homes and in public parks to share experiences and cheer each others' efforts.

Experts at the Child Study Center at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center say children younger than 12 months have no control over bladder or bowel movements and little control for 6 months after that.

But some parents begin going diaper-free at birth, and the infants can initiate bowel movements on cue as young as 3 to 4 months, said Elizabeth Parise, spokeswoman of DiaperFreeBaby.org, a network of free support groups promoting the practice.

And unlike some methods of toilet training, there are no rewards or punishment associated with it.

Dr. Mark Wolraich, professor of pediatrics and director of the Child Study Center, said the practice essentially conditions young children to go to the bathroom at predictable times or show clear signs when they must go.

"To be truly toilet-trained, the child has to be able to have the sensation that they need to go, be able to interpret that sensation and be able to then tell the parent and take some action," said Wolraich, who is also editor of the American Academy of Pediatrics' book on toilet training.

"And that's different from reading the subtle signs that the child is making when they have to go to the bathroom."

Parents attempt the early training to forge closer ties with their infants, to reduce the environmental impact associated with diapers and to avoid skin irritation caused by a wet diaper, Parise said.

Others were inspired by observing the practice while traveling abroad.

The practice also enables parents to get insight into an infant's development since more accidents occur if a child falls sick or enters a new phase such as learning to crawl, walk or talk.

This is because an infant may be too distracted by illness or efforts to master a new skill to communicate the need to go to the bathroom, said Melinda Rothstein, an MIT business school graduate who co-founded DiaperFreeBaby.org.

She says finding a supportive daycare center is the biggest challenge for parents who choose not to use diapers. Other problems include finding tiny underwear for diaper-free infants.

Isis Arnesen, 33, of Boston, has a 14-week-old daughter, Lucia, who is diaper-free. She said it can be awkward to explain the process to people, such as when she helped Lucia relieve herself in a sink at a public restroom.

"Sometimes I don't know what's gonna happen and it doesn't work, and sometimes I feel a little embarrassed," Arnesen said. "It makes her happy though, right? She smiles, she's happy."

___

On the Net:

DiaperFreeBaby: http://www.diaperfreebaby.org

American Academy of Pediatrics on toilet training: AAP Children's Health Topics: TOILET TRAINING
Parents begin potty training at birth - Yahoo! News

So what about it, parents? Would any of you had the nerve to go completely diaper-free?
Laurent is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2007, 07:51 PM   #2 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
darksithbunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,023
Default

This sounds weird. I wonder what kind of bathroom problems might be come from this when the kid is older. And I think I actually read that just before baby guru Dr. Spock died, he recanted about kids being potty trained so young and said to start later. I will go see if I can find it.

Found part of it: The late Dr. Benjamin Spock, among the foremost respected voices on child-rearing, warned that toilet training in the first year could backfire. Early "training" is really conditioning, and not learning, and could lead to later rebellion through bed-wetting, he writes in his landmark Dr. Spock's Baby and Child Care (Pocket Books).
__________________
"Didn't Happen!"~Judge Judy
darksithbunny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2007, 07:53 PM   #3 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
Laurent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Harper Valley
Posts: 26,764
Default

Quote:
Isis Arnesen, 33, of Boston, has a 14-week-old daughter, Lucia, who is diaper-free. She said it can be awkward to explain the process to people, such as when she helped Lucia relieve herself in a sink at a public restroom.
This is the part that really got me. If you want your infant to take a dump under the tree in your yard - hey, great. Fabulous.

But, I take issue with baby turds in the sink where I have to wash my hands.
Laurent is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2007, 08:00 PM   #4 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
WitchHazelEyed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Outside of Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurent View Post
This is the part that really got me. If you want your infant to take a dump under the tree in your yard - hey, great. Fabulous.

But, I take issue with baby turds in the sink where I have to wash my hands.
I'm sure she meant peeing not pooping. That would be disgusting. I can't imagine someone thinking it's ok to let their child defecate in a public sink. (Not that I think peeing is really much better)

God. I hope she meant pee.
__________________
Now logic is a wonderful thing but it has, as the processes of evolution discovered, certain drawbacks. Anything that thinks logically can be fooled by something else which thinks at least as logically as it does. - Douglas Adams
WitchHazelEyed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2007, 08:06 PM   #5 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
Pippin69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: LalaLand
Posts: 1,221
Default

I don't have kids, but it sounds interesting. But why a sink or a tree? Isn't that going to psychologically mess up the kid to associate non-toilets with going to the bathroom? Can't the hold the baby over a toilet? They are babyseats for toilets, too.

If it's all about training, aren't they teaching the kids to go to the bathroom in strange places? I wouldn't be offended by a baby with no diaper, but I would be offended by someone's kid encouraged to take a crap in my park by their parents who clearly knew they had to go. The parents are the ones who need the training to take them to a proper bathroom and use the toilet.
__________________
Librarians are hiding something.
Pippin69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2007, 08:20 PM   #6 (permalink)
ang
Elite Member
 
ang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: the salad bowl
Posts: 5,706
Default

we're going to be trying to get pregnant soon & elimination communication is one thing we really plan on giving a shot. one of the main reasons that it makes sense to me is that our children won't have to unlearn old behavior & learn new behavior in re. to the potty. another benefit of practicing infant potty training (with cloth diaper backup) is the low impact that it has on the environment.
__________________
white, black, puerto rican/everybody just a freakin'/good times were rollin'.

ang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2007, 08:25 PM   #7 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
southernbelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurent View Post
This is the part that really got me. If you want your infant to take a dump under the tree in your yard - hey, great. Fabulous.

But, I take issue with baby turds in the sink where I have to wash my hands.
I have a problem with this, too. It's disgusting. If you want a "diaper free" child, at least have the courtesy for others to make them use a toilet while in public instead of assuming that everyone else will be as impressed as you are that your spawn is relieving itself in a sink, public park, or any other place that is utilized by other people who DON'T want to come into contact with your child's waste. If you're unwilling or unable to do this, keep the child at home until it's properly trained.

I cringe when I think of the people washing their hands at that sink and probably inadvertently getting traces of Lucia's waste all over them.

Allowing and ENCOURAGING your child to relieve itself in public anywhere other than in a diaper or toilet is TOTALLY unacceptable and truly obnoxious.
southernbelle is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2007, 08:36 PM   #8 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
nwgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,840
Default

I probably wouldn't do it. Then again, I didn't do the kiddie Mozart or sign language either. My kid will probably be scarred for life, but he was potty trained the regular old fashioned way of sitting on the potty chair and gettig M&M's as rewards.
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
nwgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2007, 08:59 PM   #9 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
McJag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 33,562
Default

Oh for petes sake. This makes me so tired. How popular are these people with friends & relatives? Yuk! Like people who try cloth diapers-nasty and spend 3 times the amount on soap, using all the water and STILL they are not gonna be clean!! Poor babies. Their childhood has been shortened, now babyhood? Get a dog for fast potty training!
__________________
I didn't start out to collect diamonds, but somehow they just kept piling up.-Mae West
McJag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2007, 09:10 PM   #10 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 485
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurent View Post
Still, the practice is common in many parts of rural Africa and Asia where parents cannot afford diapers.
Well, that answers one question I've had for years - how parents in those countries handled not having diapers. Couldn't understand how the kid wouldn't just 'go' whenever and whenever.

I think this is really interesting. Would take a lot of work though.

These parents that are trying it... a tree and a sink? Seriously? I can see it would be convenient but how are you going to explain to 5 yr old junior that whipping it out whenever he/she gets the urge just isn't appropriate in social settings? Or do they plan to teach that with the extra time they'll have not potty training?
western is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2007, 09:17 PM   #11 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
crackho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Playin' up in muh pussah
Posts: 4,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WitchHazelEyed View Post
I'm sure she meant peeing not pooping. That would be disgusting. I can't imagine someone thinking it's ok to let their child defecate in a public sink. (Not that I think peeing is really much better)

God. I hope she meant pee.
Uh, I really don't want to have to wash my hands in a pee sink, either.

Oh, I yearn for the days when parents didn't take their kids out in public until they were 18.
crackho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2007, 09:20 PM   #12 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 943
Default

When I was in Venice, Italy I saw a mother with a small girl peeing on a tree. The mother held her daughter's legs straight up and the stream looked like it was coming out of a penis. At the time it seemed really odd, but after reading this article, I now know what she was doing. It seems like an interesting idea except for the going pee in public sink part, that's gross.
__________________
If you can't be a good example -- then you'll just have to be a horrible warning
PaintTheTownRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2007, 09:28 PM   #13 (permalink)
A*O
Friend of Gossip Rocks!
 
A*O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sitting in judgement of YOU
Posts: 22,764
Default

More New Age bollox. These are probably the same mothers who breastfeed until the kid goes to High School and don't believe in discipline because it crushes their individuality. Tiny children don't have sufficient bladder and bowel control to 'signal' apart from anything else. Rearing babies is hard enough without adding this nonsense into the daily routine. I'm sure all of us with toddlers who are being potty trained have sometimes had emergencies when you have to let your kid pee behind a tree or in the gutter but that's not the same thing as this.
__________________
stopp fucking talkin bout michael jackson you azz h0le! bitch ghet a fucknn lyfe bitch!
A*O is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28th, 2007, 10:30 PM   #14 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 700
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southernbelle View Post
I have a problem with this, too. It's disgusting. If you want a "diaper free" child, at least have the courtesy for others to make them use a toilet while in public instead of assuming that everyone else will be as impressed as you are that your spawn is relieving itself in a sink, public park, or any other place that is utilized by other people who DON'T want to come into contact with your child's waste. If you're unwilling or unable to do this, keep the child at home until it's properly trained.

I cringe when I think of the people washing their hands at that sink and probably inadvertently getting traces of Lucia's waste all over them.

Allowing and ENCOURAGING your child to relieve itself in public anywhere other than in a diaper or toilet is TOTALLY unacceptable and truly obnoxious.
Yeah that is probably how I got my giardia, washing my hands in the sink where the devil spawn pooped.
Anne2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 29th, 2007, 02:54 AM   #15 (permalink)
Elite Member
 
Aella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greece
Posts: 8,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurent View Post
This is the part that really got me. If you want your infant to take a dump under the tree in your yard - hey, great. Fabulous.

But, I take issue with baby turds in the sink where I have to wash my hands.
Yes, talk about disgusting!

This is just typical of inconsiderate, entitled parents embracing wacky child-rearing philosophies, who think the whole world should be inconvenienced/annoyed just so they little special snowflake can 'express themselves freely', or some other rot.
Aella is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOL "Stinky Diaper" Awards Novice Gossip Archive 15 March 7th, 2011 09:02 PM
Fox Reporter slams Hilton Parents for "Freedom" party, then slammed by TMZ! Novice Gossip Archive 13 June 26th, 2007 09:53 AM
Jada Pinkett Smith at Child Safety and "The Power of Parents" launch (05/02/07) Natee471 Photo Archive 5 May 3rd, 2007 11:28 AM
Oprah's girl's school "a nightmare" and "a prison" say parents Grimmlok Gossip Archive 54 March 13th, 2007 08:06 PM
"Train Wreck" Defense Rests Its Case JerriBlank News 3 October 19th, 2005 12:21 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise (Reduced on this page: MySQL 16.67%).