|
View Poll Results: Does "Suri" Exist?
|
|
Yes.
|
  
|
10 |
10.87% |
|
Yes, but I think there might be something wrong with her.
|
  
|
19 |
20.65% |
|
No.
|
  
|
30 |
32.61% |
|
I don't know, I'm more confused than ever.
|
  
|
33 |
35.87% |
November 10th, 2006, 10:28 AM
|
#46 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 8,570
|
^^ Have you read any of the C0$'s stuff? They believe in Xenu who shipped souls/thetans over here in DC9 Aircraft and buried them around volcanoes only to be released years and years later. LRH was quite an interesting Sci Fi writer. 
|
|
|
|
November 10th, 2006, 06:04 PM
|
#47 (permalink)
|
|
Hit By Ban Bus!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NYC, baby!
Posts: 9,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 10th, 2006, 06:11 PM
|
#48 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: pretending to be a lurker but I'm not quiet enough
Posts: 15,530
|
Do pregnant bellies move up and down???
I still say she doesn't exist. Even for that photoshoot thingy for VF, they borrowed a baby and photoshopped the shit out of it.
__________________
If you think it's crazy, you ain't seen a thing. Just wait until we're goin down in flames.
|
|
|
|
|
November 10th, 2006, 06:17 PM
|
#49 (permalink)
|
|
Hit By Ban Bus!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: In another dimension, untouched by time
Posts: 6,835
|
I'm starting to think she does not exist, because it is so weird that Katie is never seen with the baby. Also, if Suri existed, I doubt Katie would have headed off to that silly shopping jaunt to Paris with Victoria Beckham. It apparently took at least 3 weeks to do that photo shoot with Vanity Fair. I agree with Moomies that they must have borrowed someone's baby and then photoshopped the pics so the baby looked like TomKat.
|
|
|
|
|
November 10th, 2006, 06:20 PM
|
#50 (permalink)
|
|
Hit By Ban Bus!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NYC, baby!
Posts: 9,249
|
There is absolutely no reason for there to be not even one paparazzi pic of Katie and baby or "Suri" and daddy. The ONLY reason is if they had to give the baby back after the photo shoot. Which I am sure is what happened.
|
|
|
|
|
November 10th, 2006, 06:23 PM
|
#51 (permalink)
|
|
Hit By Ban Bus!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: In another dimension, untouched by time
Posts: 6,835
|
If she were really a mom, she would take Suri with her at least SOME places. There are many pics of Brooke Shields with Grier, and Gwen Stefani with Kingston. Something just ain't right.
|
|
|
|
|
November 10th, 2006, 07:02 PM
|
#52 (permalink)
|
|
Penske material!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Great North West
Posts: 6,208
|
Did you see the pics where Kate is actually hanging out with Brooke and Brookes baby, but her kid is not shown at all. (I just assumed Suri was no where nearby)
__________________
I almost didn't recognize her without the aggressive camel toe ~ LAURENT
|
|
|
|
|
November 12th, 2006, 02:44 PM
|
#53 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,019
|
I voted "NO". The random baby on the VF pics does exist, but the face is most definitely Photoshop manipulated... and definitely not theirs.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 PM.
|
