Does Suri Cruise exist? - Page 2

Tater Tot · July 12th, 2006, 10:51 PM

Katie definitely was pregnant. Whether she actually gave birth or not, i don't know. What happened to the baby, i don't know. Who's the baby's daddy, i don't know. All i'm fairly certain of is that she was pregnant. Her face and arms and legs gained alot of weight.

Although, the stretch marks make me more suspicious, just because celebrities NEVER have stretch marks. Not on their stomachs, anyway. They all have enough money to somehow avoid them, through expensive creams or surgeries or whatever they do. It would be nice to think that those are indeed Katie's stretch marks, but it's just so odd.

cheray · July 12th, 2006, 11:18 PM

No one lets their stretch marks show so obviously anyway. Or their nursing bra strap be exposed for the world to see. Can anyone show a photo of Brooke or Gwen or Gwynneth or even Posh or Liv with any of those things? They had no need to "prove" they had a baby somewhere. They had REAL LIVE photos taken of the babies they had. Its dead or deformed for sure.

Voodoo Child · July 13th, 2006, 01:12 AM

I voted yes but I think something is really amiss.

South Lake · July 13th, 2006, 03:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OCD

I vote yes based on the bright red screaming stretch marks that were visible in the photos right after the baby/pillow was born.

There was something in there.

Yes, I agree. (I posted the same thing on a similar thread yesterday).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Icepik

Someone mentioned a possible stillbirth; maybe that's it?

There would be no birth certificate at all, then, if that were the case.

Lil · July 13th, 2006, 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LynnieD

I think she does exist. I think Katie was really pregnant. HOWEVER, I do not believe it's Toms kid, and I think they are not allowing pictures of her due to some ridiculous Scientology crap. And I think there were some real schenangians going on with the alleged hospital stay/birth certificate.....

I agree with you Lynnie. I think it was a turkey baster conception, I think there was a pregnancy, and I think there is a baby. But I really don't understand why there hasn't even been a glimpse of her, or why the birth certificate is so messed up.

Manboob · July 13th, 2006, 12:16 PM

I don't know, but if she does exist I feel so sorry for the little thing.
So I do hope there is no Suri.

B.C. · July 13th, 2006, 01:53 PM

No one has seen pictures of "their" baby, aren't most parents thrilled to show their baby's picture off and their baby for that matter. I know I was. No pictures for Gramma & Grampa to show off? Surely someone would have said something. Why all the secrecy? It's to strange and it's sure making them look like f-ing idiots if there really is a Suri. And if the grandparents did get pictures why can't they show, them it's their grandchild. Toledo Ohio where Katie's from is very proud (well it use to be) of her and she had her share of write ups in the paper. Someone would have let the pillow out of the bag.

Zee · July 13th, 2006, 02:42 PM

I voted yes but something is wrong with her. Think that there is a baby but it does not look like the GMD for obvious reasons.

I agree with manboob (Great name) feel bad for the child.

sluce · July 13th, 2006, 03:55 PM

I am mixed but am leaning towards there is a baby girl named Suri - unsure who the Dad really is. I believe that Tom is withholding pics to punish all of us who didn't believe she existed and who turned on him and didn't go see his movie when it came out. His career is in jeopardy - the studio does not look like they care to renew his contract, his popularity is way down especially with women and Comedy Central is going to rebroadcast the South Park episode that he was able to block just a few months ago. Now his power is lower and he can't make them stop. A few handlers had suggested he lay low and make a come back in a year or so. Looks like he is listening and trying to stay out of the public eye. He'll show us what will happen when we take away his power! We don't get to see Suri.

B.C. · July 13th, 2006, 04:24 PM

Good theory, but it's backfiring on him.

tulip · July 16th, 2006, 03:55 PM

^ I agree. If he wanted to "disappear" he should have paraded the baby and gotten it out of the way and then done it. Now, there's just much more mystery and speculation. If this is what he is doing it has totally backfired. You don't go from having every soccer game and cup of coffee chronicled and jumping on couches to saying and doing nothing without any questions.

Idiot.

WickedHo · July 16th, 2006, 03:58 PM

There is no Suri. Never was. Suri is a concept, an idea. So until The Mighty Midget and his cult-mate procure a child of the right size, shape and color, there will continue to be no Suri.

darksithbunny · July 16th, 2006, 04:10 PM

I still say no 9 months pregnant woman goes shoe shopping!!! She had that baby way back and it's not Tom's.

WickedHo · July 16th, 2006, 04:24 PM

^^ Nunh-unh! She weren't never pregnint!

If it weren't for one particularly damning photo that showed a RIDICULOUS attempt to pass off a prosthetic belly, I'd believe she was pregnant. As far as the weight gain is concerned: actors do it all the time for movie roles, and wife of The Mighty Midget is the biggest role of her life!

ETA: I'm still trying to find the photo. It looked like she just stuck a balloon under her shirt and went outside.

darksithbunny · July 16th, 2006, 04:26 PM

You know. I think you are right. I just remembered the ice skating thing.