November 28th, 2005, 02:23 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Silver Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Africa - Cape Town
Posts: 597
|
Can someone here explain the appeal of Cynthia Nixon from Sex in the City? I find her dowdy and matronly, and they cast her amongst all these hot women, and try to convince us she's a hot catch? I thought she was WAY older as well, but i heard she's the youngest?
|
|
|
November 28th, 2005, 02:29 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: College Campus
Posts: 1,243
|
i dont think she was ever meant to be one of the hot ones on SATC. She was more of the "everywoman" on the show. Very average in the looks department. But she was by far the best actress on the show.
|
|
|
November 28th, 2005, 02:44 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Hit By Ban Bus!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 91
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiki
She is BEAUTIFUL compared to that ugly ass girlfriend of hers! 
|
ah hell - Oprah is good looking compared to her girlfriend.
That woman on Drew Carey was good looking compared to her girlfriend.
Hilary Clinton is good looking ...
However - Cynthia Nixon is not exactly the babe magnet - yuk in my book.
|
|
|
November 28th, 2005, 02:45 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: fellow traveler
Posts: 9,768
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiki
She is BEAUTIFUL compared to that ugly ass girlfriend of hers! 
|
haha
true.
yeah she was by far the least pretty on sex and the city, but i personally like her looks. to be fair, she looks better on film than in pics, i've noticed she doesn't photograph well. definitely the everywoman, but her character was awesome.
|
|
|
November 28th, 2005, 03:10 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,274
|
I agree, she isn't gorgeous. However, for those who regularly watched SATC, she did get more attractive/stylish as the show progressed. When I go back and watch old episodes I notice it even more!
*Edited b/c upon rereading my post hours later I saw I put that she IS gorgeous instead of isn't. I briefly skimmed and thought, "who the hell would post that" then panicked and rushed to edit when I saw it was me!
Last edited by Fonzarelli23 : November 28th, 2005 at 04:48 PM.
|
|
|
November 28th, 2005, 04:07 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 41
|
I agree with you PlasticGirl. I've never seen her appeal. Don't understand it.
|
|
|
November 28th, 2005, 04:49 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,242
|
She's not "pretty", but she was never meant to be pretty on SATC. Hell, Sarah Jessica Parker wasn't pretty, either. It was about their personalities, spunk, style, etc. The only really "pretty" one was Charlotte.
She looked good sometimes, when they fixed her up, especially in later episodes.
|
|
|
November 28th, 2005, 05:39 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Do fish have boogers?
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Venus
Posts: 1,000,000,153
|
she just had a dingusy haircut and bad makeup before
|
|
|
November 28th, 2005, 05:53 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In a space-dye vest
Posts: 2,848
|
I think she's pretty, in her own way. Beautiful hair, too.
__________________
2 years...
|
|
|
November 28th, 2005, 06:01 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southern US
Posts: 11,972
|
I just started watching SATC a few months ago, on dvd. I don't have HBO. I've watched 3 seasons in a few months. Still, to me, she will always be the long-haired hippie girl from the movie Little Darlings, where Kristi McNichol & Tatum O'Neal had a contest on who could lose their virginity first. Cynthia Nixon gave one or both of them (?) ginseng, telling them it was an aphrodisiac. Have no idea why I've always remembered that.
Looking back, that movie is rather alarming. It's pretty bad, even by today's standards. The girls were only 15.
__________________
ack
|
|
|
November 28th, 2005, 06:04 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Up Up in away in my beautiful balloon
Posts: 4,930
|
Lobelia I was going to comment on that movie also. I just remember thinking when I saw that movie and her character she was just weird. I dont know why but I also thought maybe she liked the Kristie McNichol character. MMMMM
|
|
|
November 28th, 2005, 06:08 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lost Angeles
Posts: 22,049
|
omg she's flatter than me! 
and thats not an easy accomplishment for any girl over 15!!
__________________
MY VAG IS ENTRANCE ONLY! "I measure success by the degree to which I ruin other people's lives." -Gary Oldman  In any case as always: I BLAME BUSH!
|
|
|
November 28th, 2005, 06:11 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: in the basement with post-its, trying to remember who/where i am
Posts: 15,186
|
Cynthia is not gorgeous but I think she's prettier than SJP. SJP is fug in my book...
__________________
If you think it's crazy, you ain't seen a thing. Just wait until we're goin down in flames.
|
|
|
November 30th, 2005, 03:44 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Friend of Gossip Rocks!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: the new casino
Posts: 4,733
|
I admit that the most striking and photogenic girl was Kristin Davis,
followed by Kim Cattrall. SJP is nothing special in the looks department
and was an annoying presence.
Cynthia always struck me as having a capacity for warmth
that even Julia Roberts doesn't have. (That's not a joke.)
I remember her from The Manhattan Project where she played
the hero's girlfriend and I thought she was very cute and
approachable.
__________________
♫ÀàâäçÉéèêë`ï î½ñÕôöøü ∴|| • ~∞≠∝ ♫♪ £$¢¥ -4°C©®™¹ ² ³
|
|
|
November 30th, 2005, 11:50 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Silver Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Africa - Cape Town
Posts: 597
|
U all have a point, i realised that when you arent watching a series, you seem to be disconnected from the characters - therefore only see their looks. I know people can see through her dowdy looks and like her for her spunkyness. I just thought she seemed older looking.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 PM.
|