Kirsten Dunst doesn't have time to reach the disposal.

waikiki · June 17th, 2007, 05:35 PM

These pics were takes outside Kirsten's apartment in LA a while ago.
Not a very classy thing to do, pretty gross instead, like she doesn't care somebody may have to walk under her window... but anyway, doesn't she have a bin or something in her kitchen?? I really disliked to see these pics even if she's my favourite actress.

Source: FanHost Networks: Entertainment, Celebrity Photographs, Movies, reviews, Music & Interactive Media

Beeyotch · June 18th, 2007, 11:04 AM

She's always been gross and dirty to me, not to mention all those heavy rumors about her long-term heroin use. So her throwing shit out her own kitchen window somehow doesn't surprise me, I'm sure she does much worse all the time.

waikiki · June 18th, 2007, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beeyotch

She's always been gross and dirty to me, not to mention all those heavy rumors about her long-term heroin use.

Heroin?? Kirsten??? I really didn't know about that.
When did she find the time?? Between a 14th years birthday and her 15th?

powerorchid · June 19th, 2007, 11:15 AM

maybe she was trying to hit the guy with the camera?

waikiki · June 19th, 2007, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by powerorchid

maybe she was trying to hit the guy with the camera?

Maybe... she's the kind of girl who does such rough things, including naming paparazzis assholes and telling them "what a wonderful job!!! Go find your passion!".

Somebody should remind her that paparazzis are basically essential to her career, otherwise none would give a shit about her.

yoyoma · June 19th, 2007, 02:47 PM

But she seems to be more interested in her career than being
famous for just being an actress. Isn't that admirable considering
the attention whores that are running rampant in her chosen field...?

Lily · June 19th, 2007, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yoyoma

But she seems to be more interested in her career than being
famous for just being an actress. Isn't that admirable considering
the attention whores that are running rampant in her chosen field...?

This is the very reason she doesn't really annoy me as much as other young hot new "gorgeous" actresses. She dresses badly and her taste in guys is lacking, but she picks very good projects and hasn't really been too sucky in anything.

tiggle · June 20th, 2007, 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lily

This is the very reason she doesn't really annoy me as much as other young hot new "gorgeous" actresses. She dresses badly and her taste in guys is lacking, but she picks very good projects and hasn't really been too sucky in anything.

"Marie Antoinette" bombed big time didn't it?

yanna · June 20th, 2007, 05:56 AM

I don't think Kirsten needs the paps. And Marie Antoinette bombed but wasn't sucky as a premise. Kirsten has been excellent in every movie she's been ever since she was six or so. That's impressive to me.

Lily · June 20th, 2007, 11:25 AM

Tiggle, just because a movie bombs doesn't mean the movie sucks.

She picks interesting projects and does a good job in them.

waikiki · June 20th, 2007, 02:58 PM

Well I like the way Kiki works, too.

I reckon she gets good roles in good movies but for some reason she never made it big. This is because she doesn't care at all, and because she is not following plastic sexy standards, and because she is not into the fashion world thing. But I recently read that every single movie she has made didn't earn back the investment for the project.

Anyway, I do like her and I think she's a really good artist. And I basically like the person she is.

Beeyotch · June 20th, 2007, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lily

This is the very reason she doesn't really annoy me as much as other young hot new "gorgeous" actresses. She dresses badly and her taste in guys is lacking, but she picks very good projects and hasn't really been too sucky in anything.

You obviously didn't see the cinematic roadkill that was "Elizabethtown." Her acting was so bad I cringed.

And yes, she's been long rumored to be a heroin user. I can't believe I'm the only one here who's heard that. In addition to many other references I've read, there were some blind items by Ted Casablanca referring to a starlet's heroin use, and are widely believed to be about her.

If you think about it, heroin would explain why she usually looks so nasty and disheveled in candids.

Sleuth · June 20th, 2007, 09:52 PM

meh i still liked Elizabethtown. Kirsten comes across as someone you could hang out with.. i think she admitted herself that she thinks marijuana should be legal so her drug usage is no suprise. Nonetheless i enjoyed a majority of her films.

southernbelle · June 21st, 2007, 11:23 AM

She is gross in her personal life but I think she's a talented actress. I think Marie Antoinette bombed because they didn't do a great job of promoting it (I never saw a preview or ad on tv) and it had a very narrow target audience that almost totally excluded men.

waikiki · June 21st, 2007, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by southernbelle

She is gross in her personal life but I think she's a talented actress. I think Marie Antoinette bombed because they didn't do a great job of promoting it (I never saw a preview or ad on tv) and it had a very narrow target audience that almost totally excluded men.

And then, who said the movie bombed??? I also think there was a poor promotional job, but it didn't bomb at all.