Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise at the baseball park (05/16/2006)

SVZ · May 16th, 2006, 12:47 PM

Laurent · May 16th, 2006, 12:56 PM

I'd hate to have to eat my words about that pregnancy never being real, but damn if I don't see what appear to be stretch marks on her stomach in those last two pictures.

Curses!

bella · May 16th, 2006, 01:00 PM

I see the stretch marks too. Hmmmmmmmmm! I'm starting to think she just *had* a baby. This seems too elaborate, even for Tom Cruise

sweetrebel · May 16th, 2006, 01:01 PM

Well now....butter em up cause looks like I may eat my words, too Laurent...they even look real...the big thick purple ones that I remember all too well...
I always said it was going to suck when we all found out this was for real...man, man, man...

Barbara · May 16th, 2006, 01:03 PM

The pillowcase needs to be ironed

happy8 · May 16th, 2006, 01:05 PM

However, the kid is not Tom's DNA

Look at the last pic how she is all wrapped up on him. These two creep me out. Will they just go out in public as a normal couple and not STUCK to each other. Gross

bella · May 16th, 2006, 01:05 PM

Maybe we need a new poll!

Somerset · May 16th, 2006, 01:05 PM

Ok, if she was pregnant, which these pics seem to indicate, it still ain't Tom's and she totally gave birth before they are publicly pretending she did. I still maintain she was walking around with a pillow in the end there to get the "birth" closer to the MI3 release date.

bella · May 16th, 2006, 01:14 PM

That's my theory too (somerset, not frank)

She was actually pregnant to some guy (Chris Klein maybe), then met Tom Cruise, and he saw as the perfect beard/incubator for his spawn. She told him she was pregnan so they came up with the cunning plan of 'extending' the pregnancy with padding and cushions, to ensure the 'birth' coincided nicely with the premier of MI3. I do believe she was pregnant once because

- she has stretch marks now
- her stomach looks just like a new mother's stomach would (size-wise)
- she did chunk up quite a lot in the 'early stages' (which would actually be the later stages, when women normally chunk up

So the last few weeks/months of her 'prgnancy' were fake as we could tell because:

- those videos where she was shoe-shopping showed someone who was not moving like a heavily pregnant women
- her legs etc actually slimmed down towards the 'end' of her pregnancy when actually she had already given birth
- we still haven't seen the bloody baby!

Wonderwoman · May 16th, 2006, 01:19 PM

She looks like a docile slave.

KD · May 16th, 2006, 01:26 PM

She definately had a baby. And I am ASSuming here, but she didn't have a c-section did she? Wouldn't she be one of the few new Hollywood mothers to have a inconvienent, oops, I mean vaginal birth?

Somerset · May 16th, 2006, 01:41 PM

I think bella's got it right. She totally lost weight during the "end" of her pregnancy.

Wonderwoman · May 16th, 2006, 01:42 PM

I think she looked HUGE at the end of her pregnancy.

dakodas · May 16th, 2006, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonderwoman

I think she looked HUGE at the end of her pregnancy.

She did look big and not all pregnant women MOVE the same. It is ridiculous to think they do. Some waddle and others never do. CZJ never waddled. My ex-boss who was in the office two days before birth never waddled.

dakodas · May 16th, 2006, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank_Rizzo

How come she's fatter now than she was toward the end of her 'pregnancy'??

I am sure she weighs less now. Also, next to that belly I am sure the rest of her seemed smaller. She may be eating more now that she feels comfortable and the baby is not compressing all her vital organs.