Topless photos of Kate Middleton published

[daisy575]

My post disappeared. Let's try this again ... I said "to my knowledge" meaning; I personally, have not seen crotch shots of Diana. I have difficulty accepting the monarchy and Kate. More so Kate, because she is symbolic of what is so wrong with the institution today. Kate is lazy, vain, uncultured, and a moocher. Kate only seems to care about Kate and the lavish lifestyle that she has grown accustomed to. Kate has 4 patronages (the average royal has twice as many), she rarely visits her charities. When Kate does, you can sense that more effort went into picking out her clothes than researching the places she visits. Based on how Kate interacts with the people she meets in Britain, you can sense that she doesn't give a hoot about any of them. She is just happy to have new designer clothes to show off to photographers and fawning people. When it comes to Kate's charities, she is simply going through the motions so that critics in Britain stop accusing her of being work shy. I won't forget the time Kate visited the families of the victims in the Birmingham riots. She was grinning like a Cheshire cat in her new Alexander McQueen garb while families were grieving the loss of three loved ones.

[A*O]

As the wife of our future king her one and only real "job" is to start producing heirs and it's time to get cracking with that. I'm not a hater and I think the institution of monarchy is more important than the individuals involved: a distinction that often gets very blurred in people's minds and especially in the media.

Having said that the royals do live very pampered, privileged lives and some of them seem to understand better than others that there's a quid pro quo in terms of being seen to be taking an active interest in and supporting various charities and other worthy causes. If you think Kate isn't pulling her weight in that respect, take a look at those bone idle York girls who Prince Charles plans to cut loose from the public purse once he gets the top job and their father, the arrogant jerk Prince Andrew is shitting bricks a the prospect. He's a real mummy's boy so the Queen is happy to bail the Yorks out. Once that link is broken he's likely to find himself high and dry.

[A*O]

Oh dear, you really do have a hardon for Kate don't you I think you're secretly jellus.

[daisy575]

I remember this. After a luxurious holiday on the Caribbean island of Mustique in January 2012, William and Kate went on another fancy holiday in March 2012 to the Swiss Alps for some R and R, because heaven knows they deserved it after labouring for several hours. In April 2012 they spent Easter in Scotland and snuck away from their Paralympics duties in September 2012 to rest in France before their grueling tour of South East Asia. My goodness, how did they cope? Anywho, the picture below and message shows where William and Kate's priorities were. If the Queen wants to save the monarchy, the future Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette is not the way to go. As for the York girls (Beatrice and Eugene) I heard that the elder sister passed her finance exams and found a job at a venture capital firm. Beatrice is only 24 years old, when Kate was that age she worked as an accessories buyer for 2 months, then quit to work for her parents business. Reportedly, she only worked 3 days a week, and left whenever William needed her. Kate's parents allowed her to have flexible hours to be at William's beck and call.

[Sarzy]

[daisy575]

I am jealous of Kate? I don't think any sane woman wants to be her at the moment considering that her name is attached to scandal and her future as Queen of Great Britain isn't really secure. If I truly envied her, then so do many journalists/politicians/and ordinary people in Britain and elsewhere who question William's choice in wife.

[CornFlakegrl]

What kind of wife would you have preferred?

Honest question. I don't follow royals all that closely so to me, they are the "idle rich" who make a show of concern for the masses through some charitable work which consists mostly of picture taking. So to pick Kate out as something worse than that seems shades of grey to me. But perhaps there is more to royalty than I think.

[aabbcc]

Don't chase the Kate hater away now. I like the company. I don't really care for the chick either.

[A*O]

I am jealous of Kate? I don't think any sane woman wants to be her at the moment considering that her name is attached to scandal and her future as Queen of Great Britain isn't really secure. )

Barring fatal accident, terminal illness, divorce, widowhood or revolution her future as Queen is guaranteed I'd say. It certainly doesn't depend on any so called. "scandal".

[daisy575]

I think William should have married someone who was more modest, caring, and humble. Traits that I fail to see in his wife. Kate comes from a scheming family whose social climbing ways is so evident. It's hilarious watching the Middleton's put on airs as if they are better than everyone, forgetting about their middle class background. They have a lot of nerve considering who they are related to: uncle Gary and cousin Katrina Darling. Uncle Gary reportedly made his millions through illegal drugs (there is a picture of him using cocaine) and the yacht he owned was the site of a pornographic film. William and Kate used the yacht during their holidays in Spain. Cousin Katrina posed recently for Playboy magazine and is a professional burlesque dancer. I know you can't pick your family, but still ... what was William thinking? By the way, there is some concern the Scotland is going to become a Republic before the end of this decade. If Scotland goes, Wales might follow, and perhaps some Common Wealth countries like Australia. William and Kate might not have a kingdom to rule when it's their time to take the throne.

[Ravenna]

daisy, I actually sympathize with your views on monarchies, but what does Kate getting papped without her knee-length bloomers on have to do with any of that? I think your point gets lost amid all the obsessive hatred and puritanical nonsense.

[witchcurlgirl]

^ amen.

[daisy575]

A lot of people are expressing their views, whether it is wrong or right, about celebrities. What makes theirs view more valid and less obssessive and hostile than mine? I honestly don't see a difference except for the celebrity that is being discussed. Don't I have a right to express myself?

[Novice]

Prince Williams is very frugal unless he is spending someone else's money. He is a part-time royal and RAF helicopter pilot in Wales. Prince William doesn't earn enough money to pay for 24 hour security, Kensington Palace renovations, and his wife's extravagant taste. On Prince Williams' 30th birthday, he finally received his inheritance from his late mother, Diana. Prince Charles released his financial records to the British public. It showed that in 12 months, he spent over £105,000 ($171,000) on Kate's wardrobe. He also paid for his daughter-in-law to have her portrait taken by Nicky Phillipps. The painting was a birthday gift to Prince William. Anyway, if you don't believe me, read the Prince Charle's annual report on the monarchy's official website:Annual financial reports

Well she was on official business. He doesn't pay for her "everyday clothes".

I think William should have married someone who was more modest, caring, and humble. Traits that I fail to see in his wife. Kate comes from a scheming family whose social climbing ways is so evident. It's hilarious watching the Middleton's put on airs as if they are better than everyone, forgetting about their middle class background. They have a lot of nerve considering who they are related to: uncle Gary and cousin Katrina Darling. Uncle Gary reportedly made his millions through illegal drugs (there is a picture of him using cocaine) and the yacht he owned was the site of a pornographic film. William and Kate used the yacht during their holidays in Spain. Cousin Katrina posed recently for Playboy magazine and is a professional burlesque dancer. I know you can't pick your family, but still ... what was William thinking? By the way, there is some concern the Scotland is going to become a Republic before the end of this decade. If Scotland goes, Wales might follow, and perhaps some Common Wealth countries like Australia. William and Kate might not have a kingdom to rule when it's their time to take the throne.

Who's concerned? I DGAF and wales can't support itself so I doubt that'll happen. At the moment if Scotland devolves Charles will be Charlie IV, there's a lot of work to do to become a republic.

[A*O]

Aussies huff and puff about wanting a republic but at the last referendum the idea was shot down in flames so it will be Charles III of Australia (with Queen Camilla, get over it Ditards) and then William V with Catherine as his Queen, middle class chav or not.

Speaking of class, daisy seems very hung up about Kate's middle class background. It's true that her mother is a ruthless social climber but she's certainly won the lottery on that one, eh? The royal family desperately needs some new, fresh DNA to dilute the murky gene pool a bit so I'm glad Kate is there to provide it. If you want to unload on the Middletons then aim at pointless Pippa and that creepy brother James.