Login to remove the ads!
Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 163

Thread: OJ Simpson questioned by police investigating a robbery at a Las Vegas casino

  1. #61
    Elite Member nycgirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    4,318

    Default

    The justice system wasn't fair back then when he did get away with two murders- why should it be now? Oh well OJ, shouldn't have killed anyone and this wouldn't have happened.

    The piles of evidence to support the fact that he did in fact kill them is undeniable.

    Quote Originally Posted by HWBL View Post
    It truly never ceases to amaze me how people are not able
    to seperate issues. One can only hope that none of you will
    ever be hounded over something you didn't do simply because
    of earlier issues.
    Yes, we all get it that the majority of people think he got away
    with murder. That doesn't, however, give the judicial system
    the right to open up the magic box in a totally unrelated case
    to try and make up for that.
    If people are truly for justice, they should be consistently so,
    and not just when it serves their personal feelings of vengeance
    or injustice. Karma can be a bitch for EVERYBODY, so those
    people'd better live 100% crime and misdemeanor free lives
    or else 10 years from now, some overzealous judge might still
    get them for whatever they did wrong in the past, even if they
    are innocent now.

    And YES: (alleged) MURDER is not a misdemeanor, thank you.

  2. #62
    Elite Member kingcap72's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    10 miles from Pootie Tang
    Posts
    21,918

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmlok View Post
    Don't they have OJ on tape at the scene?
    Yeah, I think they do. I'm not saying that O.J.'s 'Mr. Innocent,' I'm just saying that the timing of this whole situation just seems suspicious.

  3. #63
    Hit By Ban Bus! AliceInWonderland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    you already know.
    Posts
    44,567

    Default

    right, it does show what his "character" is like and he did try to escape last time on national tv so i dont even know why bail was allowed, but it was and they took his passport but i honestly think he might run...again.

  4. #64
    Elite Member Sweetie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Den of the roving cunty bitches
    Posts
    24,539

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmlok View Post
    Well the civil court found him guilty

    America! Where you can be guilty AND innocent at the same time
    Actually he wasn't found guilty he was found liable.
    Just because he was at the scene does not mean he kidnapped or held a gun to someone either. You know?

  5. #65
    Elite Member kingcap72's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    10 miles from Pootie Tang
    Posts
    21,918

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nycgirly101 View Post
    The justice system wasn't fair back then when he did get away with two murders- why should it be now? Oh well OJ, shouldn't have killed anyone and this wouldn't have happened.

    You can call it whatever you want, but the piles of evidence to support the fact that he did in fact kill them is undeniable.
    There really weren't piles of evidence. I mean, the police said that Nicole clawed whoever killed her, but O.J. had no claw marks on him and the blood and skin under Nicole's nails didn't match O.J.'s. Ron Goldman fought off whoever killed him, but O.J. had no bruises on him.

    And then there's the matter of the cops walking around with a vial of O.J.'s blood, which isn't police procedure, and then returning it with half of the vial empty, and claiming that the blood evaporated, which is impossible.

    Now that's not to say that O.J.'s innocent or guilty, but the case wasn't open and shut. And the LAPD screwed that investigation up royally.

  6. #66
    Elite Member nycgirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    4,318

    Default

    maybe piles was an overstatement, but he's probably guilty- based on the evidence that supported the fact that he did commit the murders (I won't get in to the details but if you read about the case you can find all the evidence/specifics)

    plus who the hell writes a book called "If I did it" ??

  7. #67
    Elite Member kingcap72's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    10 miles from Pootie Tang
    Posts
    21,918

    Default

    No, I don't think O.J. is innocent either. If he didn't do the murders, then he knows who did. And that stupid book he was planning to release just confirms that.

  8. #68
    Elite Member hustle4alivin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,219

    Default

    I think OJ did it, but the Prosecution botched that case royally. People bitch about Johnnie Cochran helping "OJ get away with murder" but truth be told, Johnnie Cochran was doing his job as an attorney, part of which is finding flaws in the arguements of the counsel.

    OJ should've known better, he knows people have been after him for years, and he allegedly does something stupid like this. And don't get me started on the whole racial politics of the thing. Thanks to OJ, a black man who used the system to his advantage, regular black guys like me face the possiblilty of having a harder time getting a fair trial in court. (But I live a law-abiding life, so whatever)

  9. #69
    Elite Member kingcap72's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    10 miles from Pootie Tang
    Posts
    21,918

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hustle4alivin View Post
    OJ should've known better, he knows people have been after him for years, and he allegedly does something stupid like this. And don't get me started on the whole racial politics of the thing. Thanks to OJ, a black man who used the system to his advantage, regular black guys like me face the possiblilty of having a harder time getting a fair trial in court. (But I live a law-abiding life, so whatever)
    Amen!

  10. #70
    Elite Member HWBL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    12,453

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nycgirly101 View Post
    The justice system wasn't fair back then when he did get away with two murders- why should it be now? Oh well OJ, shouldn't have killed anyone and this wouldn't have happened.

    The piles of evidence to support the fact that he did in fact kill them is undeniable.
    No, really, they weren't and they weren't so much in quantity,
    contrary to what the proscecution wanted to make the public and
    the jury believe. If that murder trial had been handled seriously,
    fairly and professionally, over half of the evidence that was brought
    to trial would not have been deemed admissable for simple reasons
    of mishandling and contamination. The whole case of the proscecution
    was botched AT the crime scene. I cannot begin to tell you what
    huge mistakes were made there and by how many people.

    Quote Originally Posted by kingcap72 View Post
    There really weren't piles of evidence. I mean, the police said that Nicole clawed whoever killed her, but O.J. had no claw marks on him and the blood and skin under Nicole's nails didn't match O.J.'s. Ron Goldman fought off whoever killed him, but O.J. had no bruises on him.

    And then there's the matter of the cops walking around with a vial of O.J.'s blood, which isn't police procedure, and then returning it with half of the vial empty, and claiming that the blood evaporated, which is impossible.

    Now that's not to say that O.J.'s innocent or guilty, but the case wasn't open and shut. And the LAPD screwed that investigation up royally.
    Exactly. Many in the judiciary system here and abroad were absolutely
    astonished that such contaminated evidence was accepted in this important
    case and how many plain and simple facts were overlooked.
    Like you, I'm not saying O.J. wasn't involved or that he is innocent,
    just that if it were an anonymous murder trial the thing would have been
    dismissed within five minutes.

    Quote Originally Posted by nycgirly101 View Post
    maybe piles was an overstatement, but he's probably guilty- based on the evidence that supported the fact that he did commit the murders (I won't get in to the details but if you read about the case you can find all the evidence/specifics)

    plus who the hell writes a book called "If I did it" ??
    O.J. is obviously a megalomaniacal, arrogant man, with an obvious
    abusive streak in him. Still, that doesn't make the evidence on which
    the case was built against him any less contaminated and mishandled.

    Quote Originally Posted by kingcap72 View Post
    No, I don't think O.J. is innocent either. If he didn't do the murders, then he knows who did. And that stupid book he was planning to release just confirms that.
    Many in the judiciary system that I know think he didn't actually
    commit the murders himself, but was involved in some way and
    was at the crime scene during or right after the murders. In truth,
    there is about as much evidence pointing at him as pointing away
    from him. The reasons why he was acquited are solely to be blamed
    on the police and proscecutors who did about as bad a job as
    any small town hicksville law enforcement office could have done.
    Warren Beatty: actor, director, writer, producer.

    ***** celeb

  11. #71
    Elite Member HWBL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    12,453

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sweetie View Post
    I have a feeling he serving time for the murders and not from the facts surrounding this case, which isn't right.

    I like how this just happened after the whole ordeal over his book. Sounds like someone is just out to get him, if you ask me.
    ^Look: how convenient>

    Sales soar for Simpson's 'If I Did It' - CNN.com

    Source: CNN.COM

    Sales soar for Simpson's 'If I Did It'

    NEW YORK (AP) -- With O.J. Simpson in jail on charges of robbery and other
    felonies, the best-selling book about his alleged murder confession is getting
    a second printing.

    Beaufort Books has commissioned an additional 50,000 copies of Simpson's
    "If I Did It," the ghostwritten account of how the ex-football star would
    have murdered Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. The book,
    which came out last week and on Tuesday ranked No. 2 on Amazon.com
    and Barnes & Noble.com, now has 200,000 copies in print.

    "The arrest brought the whole question of O.J. and the law back into
    everybody's consciousness," Beaufort owner Eric Kampmann told The
    Associated Press.

    Simpson, accused of leading an armed heist of his sports memorabilia at
    a Las Vegas hotel, was booked Sunday on six felonies, including two counts
    of robbery with use of a deadly weapon. If convicted, he could get up to 30
    years in state

    Simpson has said that he was only reclaiming possessions that had been stolen.
    Arraignment was set for Wednesday.


    "If I Did It" was supposed to be released last November by ReganBooks,
    an imprint of HarperCollins. But the book was soon pulled in response to
    public outrage and a federal bankruptcy judge later awarded rights to
    Goldman's family to help satisfy a $38 million wrongful death judgment
    against Simpson, who had previously been acquitted of murder charges.

    After signing up with Beaufort, a much smaller publisher than HarperCollins,
    the Goldmans retitled the book "If I Did It: Confessions of the Killer" and
    commentary was added from ghostwriter Pablo Fenjves and author-journalist
    Dominick Dunne, who covered the Simpson trial for Vanity Fair.
    Fred Goldman can start counting his pennies.
    Warren Beatty: actor, director, writer, producer.

    ***** celeb

  12. #72
    Hit By Ban Bus! AliceInWonderland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    you already know.
    Posts
    44,567

    Default

    ^ oh gee, whatta shock....

    but i feel incredibly sad for Fred Goldman, he seems completely devasted by his son's loss in such a manner. I cant imagine his pain.

  13. #73
    Elite Member HWBL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    12,453

    Default

    Source: The Smoking Gun
    The Felon Behind O.J.'s Bust - September 18, 2007

    The Felon Behind O.J.'s Bust

    Meet Thomas Riccio: Arsonist, prison escapee, stolen goods dealer

    SEPTEMBER 18--The California man who helped orchestrate O.J. Simpson's
    memorabilia recovery mission (and then sold an audiotape of the raid to a
    tabloid web site) is an ex-con whose rap sheet includes at least four
    separate felony convictions, including arson, prison escape, and stolen
    property charges, The Smoking Gun has learned.

    Thomas Riccio, 44, has emerged as a key player in the Simpson case and,
    presumably, would be a witness at any future criminal trial. Riccio, a sports
    collectibles dealer, set up Simpson's visit to a Las Vegas hotel room where
    the former athlete and his associates allegedly seized memorabilia at
    gunpoint from two businessman. Riccio recorded part of the confrontation
    at the Palace Station hotel and then sold the tape to TMZ.com, never
    bothering to tell police about his surreptitious taping.

    Court records show that Riccio--who has spent a combined total of eight
    years in prison--was first convicted of a felony in 1984, when he was
    nailed in New Jersey on a federal charge of conspiracy to receive stolen
    goods. After bouncing around the prison system for several months, Riccio
    landed at the federal lockup in Danbury, Connecticut in October 1984. Less
    than three months later, Riccio escaped from Danbury, where he was
    apparently held in a minimum security facility.

    Riccio spent about five months on the lam before being apprehended in
    California. He was subsequently convicted on a separate escape charge,
    which resulted in additional time in the federal system. Riccio left a Texas
    prison in August 1988 for a halfway house, where he spent a month before
    his release. In total, Riccio spent nearly four-and-a-half years in federal
    custody on the stolen property and escape charges.

    Riccio was then arrested in early-1994 on arson and possession of flammable
    materials charges. He later pleaded to those felony counts in California's
    Orange County Superior Court and was sentenced to two years in state
    prison.

    That term, as it turned out, was served concurrently with yet another Riccio
    felony conviction, this one stemming from the theft of nearly $500,000 worth
    of rare gold and silver coins.

    In that Los Angeles Superior Court case, Riccio was nabbed for trying to
    fence coins that were boosted from a numismatic dealer show at a Long
    Beach Convention Center show. According to court records, Riccio was
    arrested when a vigilant Glendale dealer called cops after he recognized a
    rare 1870 Cuban copper coin as having been stolen from Miami dealer Arthur
    Smith. When cops later confronted him in the businessman's store, Riccio
    exclaimed, "You can't prove they are stolen."

    A subsequent search of two safes at Riccio's home turned up 1100 more
    coins swiped from Smith, along with other items belonging to the veteran
    numismatist. Riccio claimed that he had recently purchased the valuable
    coins for $4500 from a white male who came into his baseball card business.
    Riccio admitted to police that he sold some of Smith's coins in Dallas, Omaha,
    and Oklahoma City. Additionally, before the Glendale dealer became
    suspicious and called the cops, Riccio had, on two occasions, sold the
    businessman some of Smith's coins. At Riccio's request, the dealer paid him
    in Krugerands.

    A Long Beach jury convicted Riccio of receiving stolen property, a felony for
    which he was sentenced to three years in prison. He was also ordered to
    pay Smith $165,000 in restitution. As a result of the two separate state
    convictions, Riccio spent 37 months in the California state prison system.

    He was released in October 1997, but was incarcerated again in mid-1999
    on a probation violation (the details of which were not available at press
    time). After four months in custody, Riccio was released.
    Here it says he didn't tell the police about taping the incident.
    On Larry King Live I believe he said he'd informed the police
    about the tape right away.
    Fact is that all "witnesses" have given multiple versions of what went
    down in that room.....
    Warren Beatty: actor, director, writer, producer.

    ***** celeb

  14. #74
    Hit By Ban Bus! pacific breeze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    in the wild blue yonder
    Posts
    15,479

    Default

    There was incontrovertible DNA evidence that connected OJ to the murders in his vehicle, in his home, at Nicole's home...the list goes on. Yes, the LAPD bungled the case and there was contamination of evidence, but there was still plenty to convict him on. But between the bungling and the star-fucking judge and the "dream team," guilt couldn't be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, which is the standard. That doesn't make him innocent. Cops and lawyers know that guilty people walk all the time when the state doesn't make its case for whatever reason.

    You can be sure if he were poor and black, Hispanic, white or polka dot, he would have been found guilty. The whole idea that this was a "race" issue is a crock. OJ was so far removed from black culture it wasn't funny, but hey, race is always a convenient card to play when the going gets tough.

  15. #75
    Hit By Ban Bus! AliceInWonderland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    you already know.
    Posts
    44,567

    Default

    they're all crooked crooks!

Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 26th, 2007, 06:09 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 6th, 2007, 06:56 PM
  3. Replies: 12
    Last Post: August 30th, 2006, 10:35 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 20th, 2006, 02:10 PM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: October 15th, 2005, 04:14 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •