Login to remove the ads!
Page 5 of 21 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 308

Thread: Miley Cyrus poses topless for Vanity Fair--AT AGE 15!!

  1. #61
    Elite Member Sojiita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Central Duh-hio
    Posts
    22,695

    Default

    The pic may be in 'bad taste' or 'risque for a 15 year old' or any number of things, but porn, child or otherwise, it is NOT. It is ridiculous to call this shot 'porn' of any kind. Call it trashy, tasteless, inappropriate, etc. but puh-leeze-it is NOT PORN, legally(or otherwise, IMO). Holy overreaction, Batman!
    Don't slap me, cause I'm not in the mood!

  2. #62
    Elite Member sputnik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    fellow traveller
    Posts
    46,162

    Default

    ^^^^
    agree.
    that pisses me off too. same as calling anyone that thinks a teenager is hot a paedophile. not that it's ok to lust after teenagers, that's not what i'm saying at all, but it still doesn't make someone a paedophile!!
    people need to remember the meaning of things. and as icky as it may be that grown men lust after teenagers, it doesn't make the pic of miley child porn, not by any stretch of the imagination.
    I'm open to everything. When you start to criticise the times you live in, your time is over. - Karl Lagerfeld

  3. #63
    Silver Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    405

    Default

    I think calling anyone attracted to a 15 year old a 'paedophile' is slightly hysterical, considering that a paedophile is attracted to prepubescent children, not teenagers. It's a way overused term imo.

    I don't see anything wrong with the shots to be honest.

  4. #64
    Elite Member Sojiita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Central Duh-hio
    Posts
    22,695

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sputnik View Post
    ^^^^
    agree.
    that pisses me off too. same as calling anyone that thinks a teenager is hot a paedophile. not that it's ok to lust after teenagers, that's not what i'm saying at all, but it still doesn't make someone a paedophile!!
    people need to remember the meaning of things. and as icky as it may be that grown men lust after teenagers, it doesn't make the pic of miley child porn, not by any stretch of the imagination.
    Whether anyone is lusting after it or not, I agree it is still not porn. Grown men could be lusting after her in a pic in a completely acceptable bikini-just because men are leering at it does not make THE PICTURE necessarily porn(it does make the grown men kind of pervy, grooving on a 15 year old, but not peds, just pervs. big difference, as you have pointed out).

    . Just like an innocent pic of a baby nude on a bearskin rug may be adorable to the parents of the child, but sexually arousing to a ped. The ped does not make the pic porn. The effect of the pic may be pornish in the mind of the sick ped, but that still does not make the pic 'porn'
    Don't slap me, cause I'm not in the mood!

  5. #65
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    The Edge of the Annex
    Posts
    5,384

    Default

    It's a very Lolita-like photo - that said, she's not topless - topless is without a top, and she's covered. To pretend that 15 year old girls are children is ridiculous. They are sexually curious, and yes, niave, but they are not children. They are young women! These boundaries have been stretched so far that they don't fit biology any more.

  6. #66
    Silver Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    405

    Default

    ^^^yes, if people look at these pictures and find them sexual, then that's a reflection on them, rather than on the picture.

    I don't see anything provocative about it. You can't see anything, she's turned away from the camera and is wrapped in a sheet. No 'sexual' organs are on show. You can see her bare back, that's it. Really i can't see the problem.

  7. #67
    Elite Member kasippu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,842

    Default

    She looks like a 25year old not a 15year old
    Where is her mother /father and why do they let her pose like this??

    are the mother of Miley and the one of Lohan related??
    eugh this are the type of people who likes dollars more than their children.
    I for one will not be surprised if this girls pulls a Britney by the age of 18.

  8. #68
    Elite Member Sojiita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Central Duh-hio
    Posts
    22,695

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TaffyMoon View Post
    It's a very Lolita-like photo - that said, she's not topless - topless is without a top, and she's covered. To pretend that 15 year old girls are children is ridiculous. They are sexually curious, and yes, niave, but they are not children. They are young women! These boundaries have been stretched so far that they don't fit biology any more.
    Hell my grandmother was already married(age 14)and had a kid by the age of 15. Of course that was 70 years ago but still. 15 is certainly NOT a child. In fact, with parental consent, can't some kids get married here in certain states at that age? And how many 15 year olds are screwing, or already have kids?

    I can understand the upset about this because this particular 15 year old, her parents, Disney, the media, the public, etc. have set her up as a ROLEMODEL, so I can see the problem, but it is a problem of particular values, and how they are being represented(or misrepresented), not a problem of 'pornography'
    Don't slap me, cause I'm not in the mood!

  9. #69
    Elite Member stef's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    germany
    Posts
    10,176

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sputnik View Post
    paedophiles aren't into teenagers. paedophiles like children, as in pre-pubescent. pervs that are into teenagers aren't much better but it gets on my nerves when the word paedophile gets tossed around like that and people forget what it really means.

    i agree her parents are dumbasses for letting her do this but it's not surprising. i don't see how this picture is any worse than when britney dressed up like a faux-lolita schoolgirl singing 'hit me baby one more time' and looking at the camera like she wanted to suck it off. i mean, sure, miley whatsherface is technically topless but it's not like you can see anything.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sojiita View Post
    The pic may be in 'bad taste' or 'risque for a 15 year old' or any number of things, but porn, child or otherwise, it is NOT. It is ridiculous to call this shot 'porn' of any kind. Call it trashy, tasteless, inappropriate, etc. but puh-leeze-it is NOT PORN, legally(or otherwise, IMO). Holy overreaction, Batman!
    Quote Originally Posted by Sojiita View Post
    I can understand the upset about this because this particular 15 year old, her parents, Disney, the media, the public, etc. have set her up as a ROLEMODEL, so I can see the problem, but it is a problem of particular values, and how they are being represented(or misrepresented), not a problem of 'pornography'

    i totally agree with you two! couldn't have said it better.

    i think some people need to realize that 15 year olds aren't children anymore.
    "This is not meant to be at all offensive: You suffer from diarrhea of the mouth but constipation of the brain." - McJag

  10. #70
    Elite Member Trixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    in my closet chugging vodka
    Posts
    13,580

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sojiita View Post
    Hell my grandmother was already married(age 14)and had a kid by the age of 15. Of course that was 70 years ago but still. 15 is certainly NOT a child. In fact, with parental consent, can't some kids get married here in certain states at that age? And how many 15 year olds are screwing, or already have kids?

    I can understand the upset about this because this particular 15 year old, her parents, Disney, the media, the public, etc. have set her up as a ROLEMODEL, so I can see the problem, but it is a problem of particular values, and how they are being represented(or misrepresented), not a problem of 'pornography'
    Exactly. I agree the picture is NOT porn, but it's certainly sexually suggestive. Nothing particularly shocking, even to a 15 year old, but I doubt 15 year olds are part of her fanbase. She's been marketed to appeal to the pre-teen crowd, and she's made millions doing it. Does she have a responsibility to all those little girls with the Hannah Montana posters, CDs, dolls and lunchboxes? I think she should. Or at the very least, she shouldn't have it both ways.

  11. #71
    Elite Member LaFolie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    In your soul
    Posts
    4,439

    Default

    I bet this photo is gonna feed Ingi's "hot Miley" thread...
    I love the smell of napalm in the morning...

  12. #72
    Bronze Member OCDer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    75

    Default

    shes britney spear all over again

  13. #73
    Elite Member dakodas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,588

    Default

    Many of you have seen me topless. I am NOT topless in this photo I will now call "The Miley" in my portfolio! The "woman in sheets" poses are a modeling standby. I am sure Annie thought she was being artistic but I think it was a bad judgement call. I can also say that even as a 36 year old woman I feel pressured by photographers to go further than I want and am told to trust them, I'll look great, it will show less than I think etc...

  14. #74
    Elite Member HelpMeRhonda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,867

    Default

    That pic looks like it's straight from the bed scene in The Exorcist.
    'High, High. Yaw Both High and Smokin' Weeeed in Front of My Howse"
    Bah-Brahhh-Teen Mom

  15. #75
    smf
    smf is offline
    Gold Member smf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by heart_leigh View Post
    I still don't understand why she's so popular...not exactly who I want my daughter to emulate IF I had a daughter, that is.
    im with you, i just dont get all the hype ,shes not even talented from what ive seen and this is so obviously a publicity stunt just to get even more money that they DONT need

Page 5 of 21 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Miley Cyrus...
    By Shalev in forum Famous Style
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: April 3rd, 2008, 03:41 AM
  2. Miley Cyrus
    By Shalev in forum Famous Style
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: April 1st, 2008, 08:08 AM
  3. Replies: 10
    Last Post: March 31st, 2008, 04:41 PM
  4. Replies: 13
    Last Post: March 4th, 2008, 02:02 PM
  5. Britney Spears poses topless in a garden
    By Picara in forum Gossip Archive
    Replies: 111
    Last Post: May 6th, 2007, 04:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •