LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksI used to like his music. As someone who was molested as a kid
by some selfish twisted douche, I would never give MJ a dime.
I wouldn't even spit on him if he were on fire.
IMO defending a chomo is... a slap in the face of every child.
I used to like his music. As someone who was molested as a kid
by some selfish twisted douche, I would never give MJ a dime.
I wouldn't even spit on him if he were on fire.
IMO defending a chomo is... a slap in the face of every child.
but... but... but... but... but... but... he didn't do it Sprynkles!
ssabmud
IMO defending grifters is... a slap in the fact of every child who was really abused by predators.Originally Posted by sprynkles
oh well, continue your misplaced sympathy.
yep I second that statement and it's the reason I so loathe Michael Jackson. Because of who he is, he gets by with this stuff. The guy says "I'm not going to stop sleeping with children" And people stand there and say "oh he's not doing anything" ....... what a world.
Bye Bye Bychance!!!!!!!!!!!!
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
Oldie but goodie:
Another juror in Michael Jackson case expresses doubt about verdict - Courttv.com - Trials
LOS ANGELES (AP) — A third juror in the Michael Jackson case who initially favored a guilty verdict weighed in after two others expressed second thoughts, saying she believes the entertainer is a child molester but joined in the verdict exonerating him because of reasonable doubt.
Appearing on MSNBC on Tuesday, Juror Katarina Carls said she initially agreed with Eleanor Cook and Ray Hultman that Jackson was guilty, but decided she could not convict because of jury instructions that he must be acquitted if there was reasonable doubt. She said it was possible that Jackson's accuser was lying.
"I kept asking myself, is there any slight possibility that this boy might lie at all? And my answer was yes," she said. Cook and Hultman said Monday as they began publicizing book deals that they believe Jackson molested his 15-year-old accuser and now regret finding him not guilty in the June verdict.
Story continuesadvertisement
They said on MSNBC that they went along with the other panelists because the jury foreman threatened to have them removed.
Cook and Hultman's reversals have no effect on the verdict, which cannot be appealed.
Jackson's lawyer, Thomas Mesereau Jr., has ridiculed their accounts, saying they may be seeking fame and fortune.
Another juror appearing on MSNBC on Tuesday, Mike Stevens, disputed Cook's claim that she was intimidated into going along. He said Cook told another juror at one point that she couldn't be swayed, and that the jury foreman did not threaten to remove Cook for holding out, but for giving personal opinions rather than following the law and the evidence.
Wow, why was she banned?
President Barack ObamaSounds amazing, doesn't it?
^Racism in another thread, apparently. They were talking about it in the million replies thread.
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
^^Yikes, that's no good! Thanks Sparkly.
President Barack ObamaSounds amazing, doesn't it?
What is a 'chomo'? I have never heard of that word.
Don't slap me, cause I'm not in the mood!
Lol, sorry, it's jail talk for child molesters. Chomo.
They are not looked upon kindly in the joint, lol!
I had a friend who learned all sorts of this
interesting jail trivia while he was in.
Damn! I missed the fantard. Oh well. Racist skank!!!!
Proud Mama....now where's my glass of wine?
Racist against my own people! What a laugh.
Happy mother's day, by the way.
That was fast. Oh well.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks