Media manipulator Angelina Jolie has contract for positive press coverage

[marie]

Angelina Jolie the Media Hypocrite

Angelina Jolie is being quite the hypocrite while doing press for her new film A Mighty Heart. The film is about slain journalist Daniel Pearl and about freedom of the press. She tried to ban Fox News from the red carpet and the media censorship did not stop there.

But Jolie turns out to be a mighty hypocrite when it comes to her own freedom of the press. Her lawyer required all journalists to sign a contract before talking to her, and Jolie instructed publicists at first to ban FOX News from the red carpet of her premiere.Ironically, Wednesday night’s premiere of the excellent Michael Winterbottom-directed film was meant to support an organization called Reporters Without Borders. Jolie, however, did everything she could to clamp down on the press and control it.

Jolie’s people went on to require reporters to sign a contract before interviewing her. They had to promise to not ask any questions about her relationships and the material from the interview couldn’t be used for anything not related to the actual film.

Reporters were asked to agree to “not ask Ms. Jolie any questions regarding her personal relationships. In the event Interviewer does ask Ms. Jolie any questions regarding her personal relationships, Ms. Jolie will have the right to immediately terminate the interview and leave.”
The agreement also required that “the interview may only be used to promote the Picture. In no event may Interviewer or Media Outlet be entitled to run all or any portion of the interview in connection with any other story. … The interview will not be used in a manner that is disparaging, demeaning, or derogatory to Ms. Jolie.”
If that wasn’t enough, Jolie also requires that if any of these things happen, “the tape of the interview will not be released to Interviewer.” Such a violation, the signatory thus agrees, would “cause Jolie irreparable harm” and make it possible for her to sue the interviewer and seek a restraining order.
I am told that USA Today and the Associated Press were among those that canceled interviews, and eventually Jolie scotched all print interviews when she heard the reaction.
“I wouldn’t sign it,” a reporter for a major outlet said. “Who does she think she is?”

Angelina Jolie the Media Hypocrite | Bumpshack.com




After Being Called a "Hypocrite," Angelina Jolie Backs Off Journalist Contract
Thursday June 14, 2007


Angelina Jolie at the "A Mighty Heart" New York City Premiere. June 13, 2007.
Jason Kempin/FilmMagic.com
Buzz up!

Usmagazine.com has learned that Angelina Jolie has reversed her position on restricting reporters' questions at tomorrow’s press junket for her movie, A Mighty Heart. Paul Colford, Director of Media Relations for the Associated Press tells Us: "APTN was asked to sign a document pertaining to an interview with her scheduled for tomorrow (Friday) but declined to sign because it is not AP policy to do so. Jolie has agreed to the one-on-one interview without the signed document."
The news comes after Fox's Roger Friedman reported that Jolie had her lawyer "require all journalists to sign a contract before talking to her." Calling her "a mighty hypocrite," Fox pointed out that Jolie's film A Mighty Heart champions freedom of press, and the Wednesday premiere of the film supported an organization called Reporters Without Borders.
Usmagazine.com | News - After Being Called a "Hypocrite," Angelina Jolie Backs Off Journalist Contract



Hey, Angelina, Sign This!

Posted June 14, 2007 | 03:14 PM (EST)



Angelina Jolie came off like the world's biggest diva Wednesday when she tried to make reporters sign Stasi-style "contracts" if they wanted to talk to her to promote her new movie.
Yawn. Could this news be any more old

Stars and their handlers have been brandishing interview "contracts," issuing edicts as to what questions can and can't be asked, refusing to hand over interview tapes and, in some cases, banishing uppity members of the press from movie "junkets" and red carpet premieres for years.
Not too many people have any idea what it entails to cover Hollywood -- other than it's probably a big joke since the most visible "entertainment reporters" are often starstruck, gushing hacks wearing low-cut tops on TV.
I doubt too many people will believe me when I say some of the types you come up against in Hollywood make Karl Rove look like Florence Henderson.
I've been in, and heard of, interview situations where the tension between star, publicist and interviewer reached North Korean levels -- all over a movie whose title by now is long forgotten.
Sometimes the star has been, as well.
In fact, there are some excellent journalists who cover Hollywood -- but at a distance. They'd never interview stars at a junket or on the red carpet. Some of them began in hard news. They ought to be in the White House press corps but it wouldn't be enough of a challenge.
I've covered both hard news and entertainment news. Hanging out with Dominican drug dealers in Washington Heights for a month for a story on the crack epidemic was about as tense as a beach barbecue -- at least when compared to being on the receiving end of a psychotic outburst from one of Hollywood's finest.
Or, even worse, being quietly blackballed from some martinet who publicizes, assists or manages a star. The scariest divas in Hollywood are rarely the stars.
I was once banned (it's called "disinvited") from one studio's movie junkets for several months while at MSNBC and I had no idea why. I finally found out it was because I had made a comment about the 1997 movie The Postman while at another network three years earlier that had "offended" someone. I never even saw The Postman. One day, the ban was lifted and that was that. I had no say in the matter.
Basic but sometimes overlooked fact: There's no public right to know in Hollywood. You can't make a Freedom of Information Act request, say, to find out if Jett Travolta is indeed autistic or he just has "Kawasaki Syndrome."
Hollywood is one big company town -- and it's private.
What goes on there, strictly speaking, is none of our business -- except when Hollywood wants it to be our business, when it has something to promote. That's when the "entertainment reporter" becomes a valuable arm of the studio publicity machine and the star's as well.
Angelina Jolie has the right to demand whatever she wants of the reporters who want to cover her. If she wants her people to shove a contract in your face and tell you to sign it if you want the privilege of an audience with her -- that's her prerogative.
And that's the problem: Angelina Jolie or whatever star promoting his or her movie that week is always the prom queen or king. The entertainment reporter is always the band geek. I can say this since I have been among them.
Band geeks don't always know that the word "no" is complete sentence. They need a Norma Rae in their ranks but they're too full of Groucho Marxes to admit her into their club.
That's why it was so great to read Roger Friedman's account on Foxnews.com that indicated some of the entertainment press balked at signing Angelina's contract. I'm sure some did sign -- but the fact that this made news and some people said no is progress.



Dana Kennedy: Hey, Angelina, Sign This!

[Sweetie]

Damn, she's good.

[Bellatheball]

I don't have any problem with a celeb who says their personal life is off limits. That's how it should be. If you listen to that video clip posted somewhere on the first page of GR (the one with her crying about her mom), the reporter clearly states that personal questions were off limits. Then the rest of the video clip shows her answering very personal questions. She lacks consistency.

[StrawberryTea]

where's all the bragelina love?? oh yea, there doesn't seem to be much anymore. is the brotherfucker falling off already?

[Lily]

Huh. Quelle surprise.

[Tyka]

Nothing really surprising here...she's a media whore, we knew that. And People is very one sided in their coverage of her.

I will give her props for doing it herself. It's the smart thing to do. She is in control. I still think she's a fake, not very talented, attention whore, though.lol

[junebug]

an article from foxnews website had this today

Brooks Barnes even missed a few incidents of "staged" pictures of Jolie and her kids in People, all exclusive and all set up in advance. In People, at least, she’s Mother Theresa, with all aspects of her prior life — partying, ex husbands, affairs, tattoos, blood in vials around the neck — expunged in favor of a humanitarian.

FOXNews.com - Rosie Will Get the Last Laugh - Celebrity Gossip | Entertainment News | Arts And Entertainment

basically what some people have been saying for a while now ,she uses her kids for photo op.

[Laxmobster]

Originally Posted by StrawberryTea

where's all the bragelina love?? oh yea, there doesn't seem to be much anymore. is the brotherfucker falling off already?

Nope we're still here, but it's not like this is something we didn't know. ALL CELEBRITIES use the paps/rags/reporters to THEIR advantage...it's the Hollywood way!


New Chinny/Piss Boy photo op in....5....4...3...you the Chin Mountain can't be trumped by Veins! (See guys I can snark both ways!)

[StrawberryTea]

Originally Posted by Laxmobster

Nope we're still here, but it's not like this is something we didn't know. ALL CELEBRITIES use the paps/rags/reporters to THEIR advantage...it's the Hollywood way!


New Chinny/Piss Boy photo op in....5....4...3...you the Chin Mountain can't be trumped by Veins! (See guys I can snark both ways!)

i could careless about maniston.

but it is hilarious to see the brotherfucker being dragged through some of these headlines. she's probably blaming brad for it.

i believe the NYtimes is the only newspaper she reads?

[Lily]

Not all celebrities use the media. Some would like to be left alone. The only celebrities who manipulate the media are the extreme attention whores. St. Vagina is no better than J. Lo.....well, she's better at the game, but as a person? Not so much.

[Sasha]

Hmm, the NYT and FOX are both exposing AJ's media manipulations? Yes, most of them do it but you don't usually hear about it from mainstream news outlets. Two in one day. Someone is PISSED. hee hee.

[cmmdee]

All of these celebs censor. Most of them already know what questions they'll be asked in an interview. Nothing new.

That is some crazy looking memaw hair

[junebug]

Originally Posted by Laxmobster

Nope we're still here, but it's not like this is something we didn't know. ALL CELEBRITIES use the paps/rags/reporters to THEIR advantage...it's the Hollywood way!


New Chinny/Piss Boy photo op in....5....4...3...you the Chin Mountain can't be trumped by Veins! (See guys I can snark both ways!)

Spoken like a typical brangeloonie anytime they is something negative about this couple the other woman gets brough into it; its so passive aggressive.
This is a topic about brad and angelina manipulative ways so lets discuss that , why dont we have the aniston bashing for her own thread/topic or when her own manipulative ways are revealed.

[Sweetie]

You all should have all things 'Angelina' figured out by now. It's so funny, as soon as a new Angelina thread is posted, everyone flocks to it.

[sluce]

These publication are pissed because they don'tget first rights to her interviews. She does what many others do. It is brilliant. Jennifer should try it so we wouldn't keep seeing all these headlines that make her out to be a desperate lonely woman. I don't believe that is who she is but the press sure loves to portray her that way. She should learn how to sell her brand once she figures out what it is.

Lily has a point too that some stars avoid the press but reality is that most do not. Most artists seeks whatever positive publicty they can get whether it is to sell tickets to their movie or tickets to musical performance. I think if you chose to be in the entertainment industry as a performer you must be willing to whore yourself out on some level.